Abstract
Despite the momentum of the open courseware movement around the world, no quality criteria and metrics for evaluation of open courseware or open educational resources’ repositories are available yet. Therefore, learners and instructors have no support and guidance in their quest for locating the most suitable learning resource that fulfills their educational aims. The same is true for developers, who have no guidelines for designing and building such educational resources. We present here an evaluation and comparison between two open courseware on data structures and algorithms, which are available from two important open courseware providers and that comply with different open courseware paradigms. Both evaluation and comparison rely on our socio-constructivist quality model, which consists of a set of quality criteria that serve as general guidelines for development, use, modification, evaluation, and comparison of open educational resources and open courseware.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Vladoiu, M.: State-of-the-Art in Open Courseware Initiatives Worldwide. Informatics in Education 10(2), 271–294 (2011)
Vladoiu, M.: Open Courseware Initiatives – After 10 Years. In: 10th International Conference Romanian Educational Network - RoEduNet, pp. 183–188. IEEE Press, Iasi (2011)
Vladoiu, M.: Comparison of Three Open Courseware Based on Quality Criteria. In: 3rd International Workshop on Quality in Web Engineering of 12 th International Conference on Web Engineering, Berlin. LNCS Series (2012) (to be published)
OTTER – Open, Transferable, and Technology-enabled Educational Resources, http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/beyond-distance-research-alliance/projects/otter/about-oers/Corre-web.pdf/view
OpenCourseWare in the European HE Context, http://opencourseware.eu/workpackages/wp2
JISC Quality Consideration, https://openeducationalresources.pbworks.com/w/page/24838164/Quality+considerations
Schuwer, R., Wilson, T., Van Valkenburg, W., Lane, A.: Production of OER, a Quest for Efficiency. In: 7th Annual Open Education Conference, Open Ed 2010. UOC, OU, BYU, Barcelona (2010), http://hdl.handle.net/10609/5103
Blackall, L.: Open Educational Resources and Practices. Teaching English as a Second Language 11(4), 1–19 (2008), www.tesl-ej.org/ej44/a8.pdf
Schaffert, S.: Strategic Integration of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education. Objectives, Case Studies, and the Impact of Web 2.0 on Universities. In: Ehlers, U.D., Schneckenberg, D. (eds.) Changing Cultures in Higher Education – Moving Ahead to Future Learning. Springer, New York (2010)
Fleming, C., Massey, M.: JORUM Open Educational Resources Report (2007)
Vest, C.M.: Open content and the emerging global meta-university. EDUCAUSE Review 41(3), 18–30 (2006)
Vladoiu, M.: Quality Criteria for Open Educational Resources and Open Courseware. In: 11th International Conference on Web-based Learning 2012 (ICWL 2012) Workshops, Sinaia, Romania. LNCS Series (2012) (to be published)
Brockbank, A., McGill, I.: Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. SRHE and Open University Press (1998) (Imprint)
Light, G., Cox, R.: Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. The reflective professional. Paul Chapman Publishing (2001)
Loughran, J.J.: Developing reflective practice. Learning about Teaching and Learning through Modelling. Falmer Press (1996)
Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Self-regulated learning – from teaching to self-reflective practice. Guilford Press (1998)
University of Washington - Data Structures and Algorithms (Spring 2012), http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/cse373/12sp
The Saylor Foundation, http://www.saylor.org
Saylor-Elementary Data Structures, http://www.saylor.org/courses/cs201
Goldberg, C.: Auditing Classes at M.I.T., on the Web and Free, New York Times (April 4, 2001), http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E07E0DD163EF937A35757C0A9679C8B63&sec=technology&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink&pagewanted=all
Miyagawa, S.: MIT OpenCourseWare: A Decade of Global Benefit. MIT Faculty Newsletter. MIT Faculty Newsletter. XXIII (1) (September/October 2010), http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/231/miyagawa.html
MIT OCW – The Creative Spark, http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/writing-and-humanistic-studies/21w-730-2-the-creative-spark-fall-2004/index.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vlădoiu, M. (2014). Using Quality Criteria for Assessing and Comparing Open Courseware. In: Chiu, D.K.W., Wang, M., Popescu, E., Li, Q., Lau, R. (eds) New Horizons in Web Based Learning. ICWL 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7697. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43454-3_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43454-3_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43453-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43454-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)