Skip to main content

Characterizing Speech Genres through the Relation between Prosody and Macrosyntax

  • Conference paper
Pristine Perspectives on Logic, Language, and Computation (ESSLLI 2013, ESSLLI 2012)

Abstract

The role of prosody and syntax in identifying basic discourse units is a recurring issue in studies of spoken language. This paper focuses on the highest-level units of macrosyntactic and prosodic structures, namely illocutionary units (IUs) and intonational periods (IPes). The study first presents macrosyntactic illocutionary units and intonational periods, and then investigates how they interact, in particular the synchronization and the relative number of their boundaries, in a corpus of spoken French. The analysis shows that it is possible to identify different types of synchronizations (total, partial, or absent) and their relative proportions, and that the combinations of these units vary according to the subgenres of the studied corpus. The results are interpreted from a functional point of view as an interaction between intonosyntax and discourse genres. It is argued that the simple features proposed here may be interesting and easily handleable and reproducible for the study of other spoken language corpora, whatever the language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rastier, F.: Sens et textualité. Hachette (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halliday, M.: Spoken and written Language. Oxford University Press (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biber, D.: Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Léon, P.: Précis de phonostylistique. Parole et expressivité. Nathan Université, Paris (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simon, A.-C., Auchlin, A., Avanzi, M., Goldman, J.-P.: Les phonostyles: une description prosodique des styles de parole en francais. In: Les Voix des Francais. Peter Lang (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Obin, N., Dellwo, V., Lacheret, A., Rodet, X.: Expectations for Discourse Genre Identification: a Prosodic Study. In: Interspeech, pp. 3070–3073 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Obin, N.: MeLos: Analysis and Modelling of Speech Prosody and Speaking Style. Thèse de Doctorat. Ircam-UPMC, Paris (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lacheret-Dujour, A., Beaugendre, F.: La prosodie du francais. CNRS (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Degand, L., Simon, A.-C.: Mapping prosody and syntax as discourse strategies: How basic discourse units vary across genres. In: Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics. Emerald Group (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lacheret, A., Victorri, B.: La période intonative comme unité d’analyse pour l’étude du francais parlé: modélisation prosodique et enjeux linguistiques. Verbum 1(24), 55–72 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Benzitoun, C., Deulofeu, J., Kahane, S., Pietrandrea, P., Bolly, C., Debaisieux, J.-M., Dister, A., Lefeuvre, F., Rossi-Gensane, N., Sabio, F., Tanguy, N.: The macrosyntactic annotation, ch. 6. Benjamins (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lacheret, A., Kahane, S., Pietrandrea, P.: Rhapsodie: a Prosodic and Syntactic Treebank for Spoken French. In: Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Benjamins (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laks, B., Durand, J., Lyche, C.: Le projet PFC (Phonologie du Français Contemporain): une source de données primaires structurées. In: Phonologie, Variation et Accents du Français Hermès, pp. 19–26. Hermès (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Avanzi, M.: L’interface prosodie/syntaxe en francais. Dislocations, incises et asyndètes. Bruxelles, Peter Lang. PhD thesis, Université de Neuchatel (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Branca-Rosoff, S., Fleury, S., Lefeuvre, F., Pires, M.: Discours sur la ville. Corpus de Français Parlé Parisien des années 2000 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Avanzi, M., Simon, A.-C., Goldman, J.-P., Auchlin, A.: Un corpus de français parlé annoté pour l’étude des proéminences, c-prom. In: Actes des 23èmes Journées d’étude sur la Parole, Mons, Belgique (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mertens, P.: L’ intonation du français: de la description linguistique à la reconnaissance automatique. Katolieke Universiteit te Leuven (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Blanche-Benveniste, C., Bilger, M., Rouget, C., den Eynd, K.V.: Le français parlé. études grammaticales. CNRS éditions, Paris (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cresti, E.: Corpus di italiano parlato. Florence, Accademia della Crusca (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., Quirk, R.: Longman grammar of spoken and written English, vol. 2. Longman, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Berrendonner, A.: Pour une macro-syntaxe. Données orales et théories linguistiques 21, 25–31 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin, P.: Intonation du français. Armand Colin, Collection U (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Apothéloz, D., Zay, F.: Incidents de la programmation syntagmatique: reformulations micro-et macro-syntaxiques. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 21, 10–34 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Avanzi, M.: Regards croisés sur la notion de macro-syntaxe. Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique 49, 39–58 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Apothéloz, D., Combettes, B., Neveu, F.: Les linguistiques du détachement: actes du colloque international de Nancy (Juin 7-9 2006). Sciences Pour la Communication, P. Lang (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pietrandrea, P., Kahane, S., Lacheret, A., Sabio, F.: The notion of sentence and other discourse units in spoken corpus annotation. In: Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies. John Benjamins Publishing Company (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Berrendonner, A., Reichler-Béguelin, M.-J.: Décalages: les niveaux de l’analyse linguistique. Langue Française (81), 99–125 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hart, J., Collier, R., Cohen, A.: A perceptual study of intonation, an experimental phonetic approach to speech melody. Cambridge University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wightman, C.W.: ToBI Or Not ToBI? In: Speech Prosody 2002, pp. 25–29 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Buhmann, J., Caspers, J., van Heuven, V., Hoekstra, H., Martens, J.-P., Swerts, M.: Annotation of prominent words, prosodic boundaries and segmental lengthening by non-expert transcribers in the spoken dutch corpus. In: LREC. European Language Resources Association (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tamburini, F., Caini, C.: An automatic system for detecting prosodic prominence in american english continuous speech. International Journal of Speech Technology 8(1), 33–44 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lacheret, A., Obin, N., Avanzi, M.: Design and evaluation of shared prosodic annotation for spontaneous french speech: from expert knowledge to non-expert annotation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop, pp. 265–273. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lacheret, A., Ploux, S., Victorri, B.: Prosodie et thématisation en français parlé. Cahiers de PraxéMatique 30, 89–111 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rossi, M., de phonétique d’Aix-en Provence, I.: L’Intonation de l’acoustique à la sémantique. In: Études Linguistiques, Klincksieck (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rossi, M.: L’intonation. le système du français: description et modélisation. In: Paris-Gap, Ophrys (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Avanzi, M., Lacheret-Dujour, A., Victorri, B.: Analor: A tool for semi-automatic annotation of french prosodic structure. In: Speech Prosody (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Belião, J.: Formalisation, implémentation et exploitation d’une hiérarchie objet intono-syntaxique: étude sur un treebank de francais oral spontané. Master’s thesis, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Belião, J.: Création d’un multi-arbre à partir d’un texte balisé: l’exemple de l’annotation d’un corpus d’oral spontané. In: RECITAL (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Beliao, J., Liutkus, A.: Oops: une approche orientée objet pour linterrogation et lanalyse linguistique de linterface prosodie/syntaxe/discours. In: CMLF 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bird, S., Liberman, M.: A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech Communication 33(1), 23–60 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Böhmová, A., Hajič, J., Hajičová, E., Hladká, B.: The prague dependency treebank. In: Treebanks, pp. 103–127. Springer (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cunningham, H.: Gate, a general architecture for text engineering. Computers and the Humanities 36(2), 223–254 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.E., et al.: Object-oriented modeling and design, vol. 199. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Goldman, J.-P.: Easyalign: an automatic phonetic alignment tool under praat. In: InterSpeech (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Beliao, J., Lacheret, A.: Disfluencies and discursive markers: when prosody and syntax plan discourse. In: The 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Beliao, J.: Characterizing genres through syntax and prosody. In: The 28th ESSLLI Student Session Proceedings (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Belião, J. (2014). Characterizing Speech Genres through the Relation between Prosody and Macrosyntax. In: Colinet, M., Katrenko, S., Rendsvig, R.K. (eds) Pristine Perspectives on Logic, Language, and Computation. ESSLLI ESSLLI 2013 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44116-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44116-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44115-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44116-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics