Skip to main content

CARess, a Gentle Touch Informs the Driver

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications (EuroHaptics 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8618))

  • 2607 Accesses

Abstract

A prototype of Human Machine Interface (HMI) used to deliver information to the driver in cars is described in this paper. The delivery of information is based on the Informative Interruptive Cue (IIC) approach. The interface is a matrix of 4\(\,\times \,\)3 vibrating motors, controlled through a real-time algorithm based on apparent motion and phantom illusion to create continuous and discrete tactile patterns. A first experiment was conducted with 22 participants to examine their ability to discriminate the tactile patterns displayed by the interface placed on the back of a chair. Results showed 61.48 % successful recognition of tactile stimuli. A second experiment based on a free categorisation of the haptic stimuli was performed with another set of 20 participants. The goal was to understand the dimensions of the conceptual space chosen by the participants when telling tactile stimuli apart. Outcomes suggest that parameters such as speed, movement continuity and complexity are used for grouping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Where by complex we mean multi-point tactile displays, in which stimuli are given by the simultaneous use of multiple vibrating actuators that performs haptic gestures.

  2. 2.

    Pico Vibe 310-117 from precision microdrives. Operating Voltage 3.3 V, Max. Start Current 120 mA, Typical Rise Time 97 ms and Typical Stop Time 140 ms.

  3. 3.

    The duration of the stimulus was given by the sustain of the ADSR function. Moreover, the intensity of the stimulus was the full 3.3 voltage supplied to the motor.

References

  1. Boll, S., Asif, A., Heuten, W.: Feel your route: a tactile display for car navigation. Pervasive Comput. 10(3), 35–42 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonanni, L., Vaucelle, C., Lieberman, J., Zuckerman, O.: Tap-tap: a haptic wearable for asynchronous distributed touch therapy. In: CHI 06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 580–585 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Vries, S.C., van Erp, J.B.F., Kiefer, R.J.: Direction coding using a tactile chair. Appl. Ergon. 40(3), 477–484 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gault, R.H.: Hearing Through the Sense Organs of Touch and Vibration (1927)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hameed, S., Ferris, T., Jayaraman, S., Sarter, N.: Using informative peripheral visual and tactile cues to support task and interruption management. Hum. Factors 51(2), 126 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho, C., Nikolic, M., Waters, M., Sarter, N.: Not now! supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks. Hum. Factors 3(46), 399–409 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hurts, K., Angell, L.S., Perez, M.A.: The distracted driver: mechanisms, models, and measurement. Rev. Hum. Factors Ergon. 7(1), 3–57 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Israr, A., Kim, S.-C., Stec, J., Poupyrev, I.: Surround haptics: tactile feedback for immersive gaming experiences. In: CHI 12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1087–1090 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Israr, A., Poupyrev, I.: Tactile brush: drawing on skin with a tactile grid display. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 11, pp. 2019–2028 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piateski, E., Jones, L.: Vibrotactile pattern recognition on the arm and torso. In: First Joint Eurohaptics Conference, 2005 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, World Haptics 2005, pp. 90–95, March 2005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sarter, N.: The need for multisensory interfaces in support of effective attention allocation in highly dynamic event-driven domains: the case of cockpit automation. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 10(3), 231–245 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, C., Clegg, B., Heggestad, E., Hopp-Levine, P.: Interruption management: a comparison of auditory and tactile cues for both alerting and orienting. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67(9), 777–786 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spence, C., Ho, C.: Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 9(6), 523–554 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki, K., Jansson, H.: An analysis of drivers steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system. Rev. Automot. Eng. (JSAE) 24(1), 65–70 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tan, H.Z., Gray, R., Jay Young, J., Traylor, R.: A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. J. Haptics Res. 3, 20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tan, H.Z., Durlach, N.I., Reed, C.M., Rabinowitz, W.M.: Information transmission with a multifinger tactual display. Percept. Psychophys. 61(6), 993–1008 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Erp, J., Van Veen, H.: Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system. Transp. Res. Part F: Psychol. Behav. 7, 247–256 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Visell, Y.: Tactile sensory substitution: models for enaction in hci. Interact. Comput. 21(1–2), 38–53 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber, B., Schatzle, S., Hulin, T., Preusche, C., Deml, B.: Evaluation of a vibrotactile feedback device for spatial guidance. In: 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 349–354, 21–24 June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wickens, C., Dixon, S., Seppelt, B.: Auditory preemption versus multiple resources: who wins in interruption management. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, vol. 49, pp. 463–467. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Trento .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trento, S., de Götzen, A., Serafin, S. (2014). CARess, a Gentle Touch Informs the Driver. In: Auvray, M., Duriez, C. (eds) Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications. EuroHaptics 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8618. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44193-0_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44193-0_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44192-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44193-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics