Skip to main content

The Two Queries Assumption and Arthur-Merlin Classes

  • Conference paper
Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2014 (MFCS 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8635))

  • 1158 Accesses

Abstract

We explore the implications of the two queries assumption, \(P^{SAT[1]}=P^{SAT[2]}_{||}\), with respect to the polynomial hierarchy (PH) and Arthur-Merlin classes. We prove the following results under the assumption \(P^{SAT[1]}=P^{SAT[2]}_{||}\):

  1. 1

    AM = MA

  2. 2

    There exists no relativizable proof for PH ⊆ AM

  3. 3

    Every problem in PH can be solved by a non-uniform variant of an Arthur-Merlin(AM) protocol where Arthur(the verifier) has access to one bit of advice.

  4. 4

    \(PH = P^{SAT[1],MA[1]}_{||}\)

Under the two queries assumption, Chakaravarthy and Roy showed that PH collapses to \(NO^p_2\) [5]. Since \(NP \subseteq MA \subseteq NO^p_2\) unconditionally, our result on relativizability improves upon the result by Buhrman and Fortnow that we cannot show that PH ⊆ NP using relativizable proof techniques [3]. However, we show a containment of PH in a non-uniform variant of AM where Arthur has one bit of advice. This also improves upon the result by Kadin that PH ⊂ NP /poly [11]. Our fourth result shows that simulating MA in a P SAT[1] machine is as hard as collapsing PH to P SAT[1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beigel, R., Chang, R., Ogiwara, M.: A relationship between difference hierarchies and relativized polynomial hierarchies. Mathematical Systems Theory 26(3), 293–310 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Buhrman, H., Chang, R., Fortnow, L.: One Bit of Advice. In: Alt, H., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2607, pp. 547–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Buhrman, H., Fortnow, L.: Two Queries. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 59(2), 182–194 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai, J., Chakaravarthy, V.: A note on zero error algorithms having oracle access to one NP query. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics, pp. 339–348 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chakaravarthy, V.T., Roy, S.: Oblivious Symmetric Alternation. In: Durand, B., Thomas, W. (eds.) STACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3884, pp. 230–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, R., Kadin, J.: The Boolean Hierarchy and the Polynomial Hierarchy: A closer connection. SIAM J. Comput. 25(2), 340–354 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang, R., Purini, S.: Bounded Queries and the NP Machine Hypothesis. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, CCC 2007, pp. 52–59. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang, R., Purini, S.: Amplifying ZPP^SAT[1] and the Two Queries Problem. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 23rd Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, CCC 2008, pp. 41–52. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fortnow, L., Pavan, A., Sengupta, S.: Proving SAT does not have small circuits with an application to the two queries problem. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 74(3), 358–363 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.A., Hempel, H.: A Downward Collapse within the Polynomial Hierarchy. SIAM Journal on Computing 28(2), 383–393 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kadin, J.: The Polynomial Time Hierarchy Collapses if the Boolean Hierarchy Collapses. SIAM J. Comput. 17(6), 1263–1282 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Krentel, M.W.: The Complexity of Optimization Problems. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 36(3), 490–509 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner, K.W.: Bounded query computations. In: Proceedings of the Third Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pp. 260–277 (June 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yap, C.-K.: Some Consequences of Non-Uniform Conditions on Uniform Classes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 26, 287–300 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Selvam, V.R. (2014). The Two Queries Assumption and Arthur-Merlin Classes. In: Csuhaj-Varjú, E., Dietzfelbinger, M., Ésik, Z. (eds) Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2014. MFCS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8635. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44465-8_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44465-8_51

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44464-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44465-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics