Skip to main content

Centralised Electronic Health Records Research Across Health Organisation Types

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2013)

Abstract

Where health and care provision is divided across organisation types, such as child health and palliative care, it is difficult for researchers to access comprehensive healthcare data. Integrated electronic health records offer an opportunity for research into care delivered within and across organisations. In this paper a new centralised model for accessing such data is justified using the critical success factors of an established research data provider. This validates a model that will facilitate integrated health research to inform the evidence base and systems used in clinical practice across organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO/TR 20514: Health Informatics – Electronic Health Record – Definition, Scope, and Context. ISO Technical Report. www.iso.org/iso/ (2004). Accessed 21 Aug 2012

  2. Twomey, P., Whittaker, A., Jervis, C.: Implementation of the National Service Framework for Diabetes: Initial opportunities for a PCT to facilitate practice and health community action plans – year one experience. Qual. Prim. Care 12(3), 213–218 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ammenworth, E., Schnell-Inderst, P., Machan, C., Siebert, U.: The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: A systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 15(5), 585–600 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graham, D.J., Campen, D., Hui, R., Spence, M., et al.: Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Nested case-control study. The Lancet 365(9458), 475–481 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, R., Baines, S., Cornford, J., Martin, M.: ‘Trying to do a jigsaw without the picture on the box’: Understanding the challenges of care integration in the context of single assessment for older people in England. Int. J. Integr. Care 7, 1–11 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kawonga, M., Blaauw, D., Fonn, S.: Aligning vertical interventions to health systems: A case study of the HIV monitoring and evaluation system in South Africa. Health Res. Policy Syst. 10(2), 1–13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuperman, G.J.: Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing? J. Am. Inf. Assoc. 18, 678–682 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobrey, A., Haesner, M., Hüsing, T., Korte, W.B., Meyer, I.: Benchmarking ICT use among general practitioners in Europe: final report. Empirica, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M., Rasmussen, P., Pierson, R., et al.: A survey of primary care doctors in 10 countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health Aff. (2012). doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guttmann, A., Schull, M.J., Vermeulen, M.J., Stukel, T.A.: Association between waiting times and short term mortality and hospital admission after departure from emergency department: Population based cohort study from Ontario, Canada. Br. Med. J. 342, d2983 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, B., Miller, E., Farrington, C.P., Petropolous, M.-C.: Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: No epidemiological evidence for a causal association. The Lancet 353, 2026–2029 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vinogradova, Y., Coupland, C., Hippisley-Cox, J.: Exposure to bisphosphonates and risk of cancer: a protocol for nested case–control studies using the QResearch primary care database. Br. Med. J. Open 2, e000548 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hippisley-Cox, J., Stables, D., Pringle, M.: QRESEARCH: A new general practice database for research. Inf. Prim. Care 12, 49–50 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Vinogradova, Y., Robson, J., et al.: Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: Prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2. Br. Med. J. 336(7659), 1475–1482 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C., Robson, J., Sheikh, A., et al.: Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QDScore. Br. Med. J. 338, b880 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham, I.M., Stewart, M., Hertog, M.G.L.: Factors impeding the implementation of cardiovascular prevention guidelines: findings from a survey conducted by the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Preventative Cardiol. 13(5), 839–845 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Department of Health: The NHS Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention Challenge: An Introduction for Clinicians. Crown Copyright, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Department of Health: The power of information: putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need. Crown Copyright, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Light, D., Dixon, M.: Making the NHS more like Kaiser Permanente. Br. Med. J. 328, 763 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stoves, J., Connolly, J., Cheung, C.K., Grange, A. et al.: Electronic consultation as an alternative to hospital referral for patients with chronic kidney disease: a novel application for networked electronic health records to improve the accessibility and efficiency of healthcare. Qual. Saf. Health Care 19(5), e54 PMID: 20554576 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ham, C., York, N., Sutch, S., Shaw, R.: Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS, Kaiser permanente, and the US medicare programme: analysis of routine data. Br. Med. J. 327, 1257 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keen, J., Denby, T.: Partnerships in the digital age. In: Glasby, J., Dickinson, H. (ed.) International Perspectives on Health and Social Care: Partnerships Working in Action, pp. 95–107. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Sussex (2009). ISBN-10: 1444322591

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moore, P., Armitage, G., Wright, J., Dobrzanski, S., et al.: Medicines reconciliation using a shared electronic health care record. J. Patient Saf. 7(3), 148–154 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Department of Health: Making IT happen: information about the National Programme for IT. www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ (2003). Accessed 27 July 2012

  25. Cheetham, T.C., Levy, G., Niu, F., Bixler, F.: Gastrointestinal safety of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and selective cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors in patients on warfarin. Ann. Pharmacother. 43(11), 1765–1773 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bohensky, M.A., Jolley, D., Sundararajan, V., Evans, S., et al.: Data Linkage: A powerful research tool with potential problems. BMC Health Serv. Res. 10(1), 346 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crossfield, S.S.R., Bates, C.J., Parry, J.: ResearchOne Database Protocol. Copyright ResearchOne (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen, J.: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1), 155–159 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lowrance, W.: Learning from experience: privacy and the secondary use of data in health research. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 8(1), 2–7 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wellcome Trust: Towards Consensus for Best Practice: Use of patient records from general practice for research. www.wellcome.ac.uk/GPrecords (2009). Accessed 01 Aug 2012

  31. Hippisley-Cox, J., Stables, D.: QRESEARCH: An ethical high quality general practice database for research. Copyright QRESEARCH (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Economic and Social Data Service: www.ccsr.ac.uk/esds/variables/ (2012). Accessed 28 Aug 2012

  33. Powell, J., Buchan, I.: Electronic Health Records Should Support Clinical Research. Journal of Medical Internet Research 7(1), e4 URL: www.jmir.org/2005/1/e4/ (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samantha S. R. Crossfield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crossfield, S.S.R., Clamp, S.E. (2014). Centralised Electronic Health Records Research Across Health Organisation Types. In: Fernández-Chimeno, M., et al. Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. BIOSTEC 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44485-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44485-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44484-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44485-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics