Abstract
Consumers are often confronted with multiple types of online advertising before they click on advertisements or make a purchase. The respective attribution of the success of the companies’ marketing activities leads to a sophisticated allocation process. We developed a new approach to (1) address consumers’ buying decision processes, (2) to account for the effects of multiple online advertising channels, and (3) consequently attribute the success of marketing activities more realistically than current management heuristics do. For example, compared to standardized metrics, we found paid search advertising to be overestimated and retargeting display advertising to be underestimated. We further found that the use of a Bayesian mixture of normals approach is useful for considering heterogeneity in the individual propensity of consumers to purchase; for the majority of consumers (more than 90 %), repeated clicks on advertisements decrease their probability of purchasing. In contrast with this segment, we found a smaller segment of consumers (nearly 10 %) whose clicks on advertisements increase conversion probabilities. Our approaches will help managers to better understand consumer online search and buying behavior over time and to allocate financial spending more efficiently across multiple types of online advertising.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The profitability and effectiveness of online advertising campaigns may be assessed by using different ratios, such as click-through rate (CTR), which is the ratio of clicks to impressions for a specific type of advertising; conversion rate (CVR), which is defined as the number of purchases in relation to the number of clicks; and cost per click (CPC) and cost per order (CPO) as measures of the efficiency of promotional activities [4, 20].
- 2.
The datasets have been sanitized for reasons of confidentiality.
- 3.
Although direct visits are not any type of advertising, we will denote and treat it as an advertising channel for the sake of convenience.
- 4.
The findings are significantly negative for \(x_{ist}^{direct}\) and \(x_{ist}^{other}\).
- 5.
Please note that only \(y^\text {direct}_{is}\) is significant, whereas the others are barely not significant.
- 6.
Please note that because of simplifications and for convenience, we do not distinguish between significant and non-significant parameter estimates.
- 7.
Note that we multiply the mean parameter estimates with the mean of the respective variables: \(-4.09 = -0.26*7.30 - 0.50*0.81 - 0.91*1.96\).
References
Abhishek, V., Hosanagar, K., Fader, P.S.: On aggregation bias in sponsored search data: existence and implications (2011). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1490169
Allenby, G.M., Ginter, J.L.: Using extremes to design products and segment markets. J. Mark. Res. 32(4), 392–403 (1995). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3152175
Ansari, A., Mela, C.F., Neslin, S.A.: Customer channel migration. J. Mark. Res. 45(1), 60–76 (2008)
Athey, S., Ellison, G.: Position auctions with consumer search (2009). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1454986
Bass, F.M., Bruce, N., Majumdar, S., Murthi, B.P.S.: Wearout effects of different advertising themes: a dynamic bayesian model of the advertising-sales relationship. Mark. Sci. 26(2), 179–195 (2007)
Broder, A.: A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2), 3–10 (2002)
Chatterjee, P., Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Modeling the clickstream: implications for web-based advertising efforts. Mark. Sci. 22(4), 520–541 (2003)
Danaher, P.J., Mullarkey, G.: Factors affecting online advertising recall: a study of students. J. Advert. Res. 43(3), 252–267 (2003)
Deleersnyder, B., Geyskens, I., Gielens, K., Dekimpe, M.G.: How cannibalistic is the internet channel? a study of the newspaper industry in the united kingdom and the Netherlands. Int. J. Res. Mark. 19(4), 337–348 (2002). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8R-473FW9H-3/2/6898e255f0f486b1df6be707a03c364a
Dinner, I.M., van Heerde, H.J., Neslin, S.A.: Driving online and offline sales: the cross-channel effects of digital versus traditional advertising (2011). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1955653
Ghose, A., Yang, S.: An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: sponsored search in electronic markets. Manage. Sci. 55(10), 1605–1622 (2009)
Goldfarb, A., Tucker, C.: Standardization, standards and online advertising (2011). http://ssrn.com/abstract=1745645
Ilfeld, J.S., Winer, R.S.: Generating website traffic. J. Advert. Res. 42(5), 49–61 (2002)
Lenk, P.J., DeSarbo, W.S., Green, P.E., Young, M.R.: Hierarchical bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Mark. Sci. 15(2), 173–191 (1996). http://www.jstor.org/stable/184192
Naik, P.A., Peters, K.: A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media synergies. J. Interact. Mark. 23(4), 288–299 (2009)
Naik, P.A., Raman, K.: Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Mark. Res. 40(4), 375–388 (2003)
Neslin, S.A., Grewal, D., Leghorn, R., Shankar, V., Teerling, M.L., Thomas, J.S., Verhoef, P.C.: Challenges and opportunities in multichannel customer management. J. Serv. Res. 9(2), 95–112 (2006)
Neslin, S.A., Shankar, V.: Key issues in multichannel customer management: current knowledge and future directions. J. Interact. Mark. 23(1), 70–81 (2009)
Nottorf, F.: Modeling the clickstream across multiple online advertising channels using a binary logit with Bayesian mixture of normals. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 13(1), 45–55 (2014). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422313000483
Nottorf, F., Funk, B.: A cross-industry analysis of the spillover effect in paid search advertising. Electron. Mark. 23(3), 205–216 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0117-z
Nottorf, F., Funk, B.: The economic value of clickstream data from an advertiser’s perspective. In: Proceedings of the 21th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, Netherlands 2013 (2013)
Rossi, P.E., Allenby, G.M., McCulloch, R.E.: Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. Wiley, Hoboken (2005)
Rutz, O.J., Bucklin, R.E.: Does banner advertising affect browsing for brands? clickstream choice model says yes, for some. Quant. Mark. Econ., pp. 1–27 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11129-011-9114-3
Rutz, O.J., Bucklin, R.E., Sonnier, G.P.: A latent instrumental variables approach to modeling keyword conversion in paid search advertising. J. Mark. Res. 49(3), 306–319 (2012). http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0354
Rutz, O.J., Trusov, M., Bucklin, R.E.: Modeling indirect effects of paid search advertising: which keywords lead to more future visits? Mark. Sci. 30(4), 646–665 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0635
uniquedigital: Cross-channel management (2012). http://www.uniquedigital.de/downloads/whitepaper-unique-cross-channel-management
Way, H.: Real-time bidding: greasing the wheels of digital advertising (2012). http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/76000.html
Wiesel, T., Pauwels, K., Arts, J.: Marketing’s profit impact: quantifying online and off-line funnel progression. Mark. Sci. 30(4), 604–611 (2011). doi:10.1287/mksc.1100.0612
Yoon, H.S., Lee, D.H.: The exposure effect of unclicked banner advertisements. Adv. Int. Mark. 7(18), 211–229 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nottorf, F. (2014). Multi-channel Attribution Modeling on User Journeys. In: Obaidat, M., Filipe, J. (eds) E-Business and Telecommunications. ICETE 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 456. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44788-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44788-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44787-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44788-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)