Skip to main content

Strategies for Scheduling Risk Mitigation in Software Project Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Technologies (ICSOFT 2013)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 457))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 601 Accesses

Abstract

The adoption of risk management practices can help to increase the success rate of software project. As an essential process of risk management, risk mitigation aims to reduce or eliminate risks. To make the best use of resources, a scheduling strategy for risk mitigation is needed to determine the risks to be mitigated and when to mitigate them. Both PMI risk management framework and IEEE standard for software project risk management point out that time elements should be considered in risk mitigation. However, the traditionally used strategy for scheduling risk mitigation does not consider time elements. In this paper, we formally define scheduling strategy for risk mitigation, identify new scheduling strategies with due consideration of time elements, and compare their performance by applying stochastic simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AS/NZS 2004. AS/NZS 4360: Risk Management. Standards Australia International Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boehm, B.W.: Software Risk Management. IEEE Computer Society Press, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cadle, J., Yeates, D.: Project Management for Information Systems. Harlow, Prentice Hall (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carr, M.J., Konda, S.L., Monarch, I., Ulrich, C., Walker, C.F.: Taxonomy-Based Risk Identification. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heemstra, F.J., Kusters, R.J.: Dealing with risk: a practical approach. J. Inf. Technol. 11, 333–346 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holton, G.A.: Defining risk. Financ. Anal. J. 60, 12–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. IEEE 2001. IEEE Std 1540-2001: IEEE Standard for Software Life Cycle Processes—Risk Management. IEEE SA, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 2009. ISO 31000: Risk Management - Principle and Guidelines. International Standard Organization, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keil, M., Cule, P.E., Lyytinen, K., Schmidt, R.C.: A framework for identifying software project risks. Commun. ACM 41(11), 76–83 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwan, T.W.: A Risk Management Methodology with Risk Dependencies. Doctor of Philosophy, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kwan, T.W., Leung, H.K.N.: A risk management methodology for project risk dependencies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 37, 635–648 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leung, H.K.N.: Variants of risk and opportunity. In: 17th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference, Sydney, Australia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lister, T.: Risk management is project management for adults. IEEE Softw. 14(3), 20 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. PMI 2008. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project management Institute, Newtown, PA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sargent, R.G.: Verification and validation of simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sei 2006. CMMI® for Development Version 1.2. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sherer, S.A.: Managing risk beyond the control of is managers: the role of business management. In: Proceedings of 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, R.C., Pandelios, G.J., Behrens, S.G.: Software Risk Evaluation (SRE) Method Description (version 2.0). Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, P.: Managing Time Elements of Risk. Doctor of Philosophy, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou, P., Leung, H.K.N.: Improving risk management with modeling time element. In: 15th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, Dallas, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, P., Leung, H.K.N.: A stochastic simulation model for risk management process. In: 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2012), Hong Kong (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partly supported by Hong Kong Polytechnic University grant G-YK27.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hareton K. N. Leung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhou, P., Leung, H.K.N. (2014). Strategies for Scheduling Risk Mitigation in Software Project Management. In: Cordeiro, J., van Sinderen, M. (eds) Software Technologies. ICSOFT 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 457. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44920-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44920-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44919-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44920-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics