Abstract
Designing business processes from scratch is an intricate and challenging task for process modellers. For this reason, the reuse of process patterns has become an integral part of process modelling in order to deal with recurring design issues in a given domain when modelling new business processes and variants thereof. The specialization of abstract process activities remains a key issue in process pattern reuse. Depending on the intended purpose of process pattern reuse, the specialization of abstract process activities typically ranges from the substitution of abstract process activities with sub-processes to the substitution of activity labels with specialized labels. The specialization of abstract process activities through label specialization has been hardly investigated so far in the business process community. The approach presented in this paper achieves consistent specialization of abstract process activities by ensuring consistent specialization of activity labels through exploitation of semantic activity labels as introduced in previous work. Semantic activity labels encode the linguistic meaning of process activities and thereby facilitate the establishment of consistency criteria based on the implicit semantics captured by activity labels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Basten, T.: Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theor. Comput. Sci. 270(1-2), 125–203 (2002)
Becker, J., Delfmann, P., Knackstedt, R.: Adaptive reference modeling: Integrating configurative and generic adaptation techniques for information models. In: Becker, J., Delfmann, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling, pp. 27–58. Physica-Verlag HD (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1966-3_2
Bögl, A., Karlinger, M., Schrefl, M., Pomberger, G.: EPCs annotated with lexical and semantic labels to bridge the gap between human understandability and machine interpretability. In: Smolnik, S., F.T, Thomas, O. (eds.) Semantic Technologies for Business and Information Systems Engineering, pp. 214–241. IGI Global (2012), NOTE: The published version of this book chapter unfortunately contains numerous typesetting errors caused by the publisher. An error-free version is available at the authors’ website http://www.dke.jku.at/research/publications
Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 498–516 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2010.09.006
Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: Roddick, J.F., Hinze, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2007). CRPIT, vol. 67, pp. 71–80 (2007)
Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L., Saccá, D.: An ontology-driven process modeling framework. In: Galindo, F., Takizawa, M., Traunmüller, R. (eds.) DEXA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3180, pp. 13–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeßketten (EPK). Tech. Rep. 89, Universität des Saarlandes, Germany, Saarbrücken, Germany (January 1992)
Koschmider, A., Blanchard, E.: User assistance for business process model decomposition. In: First IEEE International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science, pp. 445–454 (2007)
Lausen, G.: Modeling and analysis of the behavior of information systems. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 14(11), 1610–1620 (1988)
Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On labeling quality in business process models. In: Proceedings of the 8th GI-Workshop Geschftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten (EPK), Berlin, Germany (2009)
Lyons, J.: Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press (1995)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What makes process models understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 467–482 (2010)
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0, OMG Document Number: formal/2011-01-03, http://www.omg.org/spec/bpmn/2.0/ (last visited September 29, 2014)
Reinhartz-Berger, I., Soffer, P., Sturm, A.: Extending the adaptability of reference models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 40(5), 1045–1056 (2010)
Schrefl, M.: Behavior modelling by stepwise refining behavior diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Entity-Relationship Approach (ER 1990), pp. 113–128 (1990)
Schrefl, M., Stumptner, M.: Behavior-consistent specialization of object life cycles. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 11(1), 92–148 (2002)
Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Weske, M.: From fine-grained to abstract process models: A semantic approach. Inf. Syst. 37(8), 784–797 (2012)
Weidlich, M., Barros, A., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Vertical alignment of process models – how can we get there? In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 71–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The iCoP framework: Identification of correspondences between process models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: A foundational approach for managing process variability. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 267–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Structural and behavioural commonalities of process variants. In: Gierds, C., Sürmeli, J. (eds.) ZEUS 2010. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 563, pp. 41–48. CEUR-WS.org (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bögl, A., Karlinger, M., Schütz, C., Schrefl, M., Pomberger, G. (2015). Exploiting Semantic Activity Labels to Facilitate Consistent Specialization of Abstract Process Activities. In: Italiano, G.F., Margaria-Steffen, T., Pokorný, J., Quisquater, JJ., Wattenhofer, R. (eds) SOFSEM 2015: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8939. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46078-8_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46078-8_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46077-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46078-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)