Skip to main content

Negativity Bias Effect in Helpfulness Perception of Word-of-Mouths: the Influence of Concreteness and Emotion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research (MISNC 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 540))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Word-of-mouth (WOM) is a powerful information resource for consumers to judge a product or service. WOM has persuasive power when audiences regard it as helpful. There is a psychological phenomenon, called the negativity bias, in which negative WOMs are usually regarded as more helpful than positive ones. However, not all previous studies supported the existence of negativity bias. This paper examines the negativity bias effect of WOM and explores the moderating effect of length and emotional content on the helpfulness perception of WOM. This study adopted experimental designs of 2 (positive/negative WOMs) X 2 (long/short WOMs) X 2 (WOMs with strong emotion/weak emotion) of 139 subjects. The empirical survey results reveal that length and emotional content of WOMs are influential factors for helpfulness perception of WOMs. Moreover, both length content and emotional content of WOMs also moderate the negativity bias effect of helpfulness perception. The negativity bias effect appears when WOMs are concrete and emotional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Godes, D., Mayzlin, D.: Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Commun. Market. Sci. 23, 545–560 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R., Kim, J.: Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective. J. Consum. Behav., 454–462 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sen, S., Lerman, D.: Why Are You Telling Me This? An Examination into Negative Consumer Reviews on the Web. J. Interact. Market. 21, 76–94 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dichter, E.: How Word-of-Mouth Advertising Works. Harvard Bus. Rev. 44, 147–160 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harrison-Walker, L.J.: The Measurement of Word-of-Mouth Communication and an Investigation of Service Quality and Customer Commitment as Potential Antecedents. J. Serv. Res. 4, 60–75 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arndt, J.: Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. J. Market. Res., 291–295 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak, K.L., McGloin, R.: The Influence of Peer Reviews on Source Credibility and Purchase Intention. Soc. 4, 689–705 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung, C.M., Lee, M.K.: What Drives Consumers to Spread Electronic Word of Mouth in Online Consumer-Opinion Platforms. Decis. Support. Syst. 53, 218–225 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G., Gremler, D.D.: Electronic Word-of-Mouth Via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet? J. Interact. Market. 18, 38–52 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., Walsh, G.: Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Motives for and Consequences of Reading Customer Articulations on the Internet. Int. J. Electron. Com. 8, 51–74 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cui, G., Lui, H.-K., Guo, X.: The Effect of Online Consumer Reviews on New Product Sales. Int. J. Electron. Com. 17, 39–58 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu, F., Zhang, X.: Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics. J. Market. 74, 133–148 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Melián-González, S., Bulchand-Gidumal, J., López-Valcárcel, B.G.: Online Customer Reviews of Hotels as Participation Increases, Better Evaluation Is Obtained. Cornell. Hosp. Q. 54, 274–283 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, T.C., Wang, C.Y., Wu, L.W.: Moderators of the Negativity Effect: Commitment, Identification, and Consumer Sensitivity to Corporate Social Performance. Psychol. Market. 27, 54–70 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peeters, G.: The Positive-Negative Asymmetry: On Cognitive Consistency and Positivity Bias. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 1, 455–474 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rozin, P., Royzman, E.B.: Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 5, 296–320 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ito, T.A., Larsen, J.T., Smith, N.K., Cacioppo, J.T.: Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 887 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sridhar, S., Srinivasan, R.: Social Influence Effects in Online Product Ratings. J. Market. 76, 70–88 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin, D., Song, J.H., Biswas, A.: Electronic Word-of-Mouth (Ewom) Generation in New Media Platforms: The Role of Regulatory Focus and Collective Dissonance. Market. Lett. 25, 153–165 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qiu, L., Pang, J., Lim, K.H.: Effects of Conflicting Aggregated Rating on Ewom Review Credibility and Diagnosticity: The Moderating Role of Review Valence. Decis. Support. Syst. 54, 631–643 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bae, S., Lee, T.: Gender Differences in Consumers’ Perception of Online Consumer Reviews. Electron. Commer. Res. 11, 201–214 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu, P.F.: In Search of Negativity Bias: An Empirical Study of Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews. Psychol. Market. 30, 971–984 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schellekens, G.A., Verlegh, P.W., Smidts, A.: Language Abstraction in Word of Mouth. J. Consum. Behav. 37, 207–223 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Banerjee, S., Chua, A.Y.: Understanding the process of writing fake online reviews. In: 2014 Ninth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM), pp. 68–73. IEEE Press, Thailand (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parrott, W.G.: But Emotions Are Sometimes Irrational. Psychol. Inq. 6, 230–232 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., Vohs, K.D.: Bad Is Stronger Than Good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 323 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fiske, S.T.: Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38, 889 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mittal, V., Ross Jr., W.T., Baldasare, P.M.: The Asymmetric Impact of Negative and Positive Attribute-Level Performance on Overall Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions. J. Marketing, 33–47 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. Q. J. Econ., 1039–1061 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lane, V.R., Keaveney, S.M.: The Negative Effects of Expecting to Evaluate: Reexamination and Extension in the Context of Service Failure. Psychol. Market. 22, 857–885 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cameron, K.S., Caza, A.: Introduction Contributions to the Discipline of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Am. Behav. Sci. 47, 731–739 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lang, B.: How Word of Mouth Communication Varies across Service Encounters. Manag. Serv. Qual. 21, 583–598 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Davidow, M., Leigh, J.H.: The Effects of Organizational Complaint Responses on Consumer Satisfaction, Word of Mouth Activity and Repurchase Intentions. J. Consum. Satisf. Dissatif. Compaining Behav. 11, 91–102 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee, M., Youn, S.: Electronic Word of Mouth (Ewom) How Ewom Platforms Influence Consumer Product Judgement. Int. J. Advert. 28, 473–499 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Skowronski, J.J., Carlston, D.E.: Social Judgment and Social Memory: The Role of Cue Diagnosticity in Negativity, Positivity, and Extremity Biases. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 689 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Purnawirawan, N., Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P.: Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: The Wrap Effect. Int. J. Electron. Com. 17, 71–98 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, Z., Lurie, N.H.: Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth. J. Marketing Res. 50, 463–476 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, J.Q., Craciun, G., Shin, D.: When Does Electronic Word-of-Mouth Matter? A Study of Consumer Product Reviews. J. Bus. Res. 63, 1336–1341 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Daugherty, T., Hoffman, E.: Ewom and the Importance of Capturing Consumer Attention within Social Media. J. Marketing Commun. 20, 82–102 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Semin, G.R., Fiedler, K.: The Cognitive Functions of Linguistic Categories in Describing Persons: Social Cognition and Language. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 558 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schindler, R.M., Bickart, B.: Perceived Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews: The Role of Message Content and Style. J. Consum. Behav. 11, 234–243 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mudambi, S.M., Schuff, D.: What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon. Com. MIS Quart. 34, 185–200 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mattila, A.S., Ro, H.: Discrete Negative Emotions and Customer Dissatisfaction Responses in a Casual Restaurant Setting. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 32, 89–107 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeelenberg, M., Pieters, R.: Beyond Valence in Customer Dissatisfaction: A Review and New Findings on Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment in Failed Services. J. Bus. Res. 57, 445–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wetzer, I.M., Zeelenberg, M., Pieters, R.: “Never Eat in That Restaurant, I Did!”: Exploring Why People Engage in Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication. Psychol. Market. 24, 661–680 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yin, D., Bond, S., Zhang, H.: Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews. MIS Quart. 38, 539–560 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xia, L., Bechwati, N.N.: Word of Mouse: The Role of Cognitive Personalization in Online Consumer Reviews. J. Interac. Advert. 9, 3–13 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46, 69 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Chien Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, CC., Chou, FS., Chen, CC., Yang, YJ. (2015). Negativity Bias Effect in Helpfulness Perception of Word-of-Mouths: the Influence of Concreteness and Emotion. In: Wang, L., Uesugi, S., Ting, IH., Okuhara, K., Wang, K. (eds) Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research. MISNC 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 540. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48319-0_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48319-0_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48318-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48319-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics