Skip to main content

Formal a Priori Power Analysis of Elements of a Communication Graph

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9621))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2284 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents the idea of measuring the formal impact of elements of a communication graph structure consisting of nodes and arcs on its entirety or subparts. Arcs and nodes, depending on the context, can be assigned different interpretations. E.g. in game theory its nodes may represent the players, often referred to as policy makers and arcs symbolize the relationships between them. In another context, however, nodes and arcs of the graph represent elements of technical infrastructure, e.g. a computer. The graph representing the tested relationships is called the communication graph and the influence of the elements on the entire graph (or its subpart) is referred to as power of the element. Taking into account the power of nodes and connections creates so-called incidence-power matrix more completely than the one formerly describing the communication graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It could be for example: traditional mail, e-mail, phone calls, personal meeting, etc. In such a case connections' weights can be modified by adding for example different values for to differentiate connections (and different weights of nodes).

  2. 2.

    As we will see later, this condition is not necessary for games with graph representing communication between players.

  3. 3.

    In Turnovec et al. (2008) one can find introduction of power indices without games theory but based on concept of permutations and their probability.

  4. 4.

    We use the | . | operator to denote the cardinality of a finite set.

References

  • Alonso-Meijide, J.M., Alvares-Mozos, M., Fiestras-Janeiro, M.G.: Values of games with graph restricted communication and a priori unions. Math. Soc. Sci. 58, 202–213 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J., Dreze, J.: Cooperative games with coalitional structures. Int. J. Game Theory 3, 217–237 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banzhaf III, J.F.: Weighted voting doesn’t work: and mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Rev. 19, 317–343 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamiache, G.: A value with incomplete communication. Games Econ. Behav. 26, 59–78 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hamiache, G.: A matrix approach to TU games with coalition and communication structures. Soc. Choice Welfares 38, 85–100 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mercik, J.: On a priori evaluation of power of veto. In: Herrera-Viedma, E., García-Lapresta, J.L., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H., Zadrożny, S. (eds.) Consensual Processes. STUDFUZZ, vol. 267, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mercik, J.: Classification of committees with vetoes and conditions for the stability of power indices. Neurocomputing 149(Part C), 1143–1148 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R.B.: Graphs and cooperation in games. Math. Oper. Res. 2, 225–229 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G.: Values of games with a priori unions. In: Henn, R., Moeschlin, O. (eds.) Mathematical Economics and Game Theory. LNEMS, vol. 141, pp. 76–88. Springer, Heidelberg (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, E.C.: Communication and its costs in graph-restricted games. Soc. Netw. 10, 275–286 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S., Shubik, M.: A method of evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 48(3), 787–792 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S.: A value for n-person games. In: Kuhn, H.W., Tucker, A.W. (eds.) Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. II. Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 28, pp. 307–317 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovec, F., Mercik, J., Mazurkiewicz, M.: Power indices methodology: decisiveness, pivots, and swings. In: Braham, M., Steffen, F. (eds.) Power, Freedom, and Voting, pp. 23–37. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vasques-Brage, M., Garcia-Jurado, I., Carreras, F.: The Owen value applied to games with graph-restricted communication. Games Econ. Behav. 12, 42–53 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Mercik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mercik, J. (2016). Formal a Priori Power Analysis of Elements of a Communication Graph. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawiński, B., Fujita, H., Hong, TP. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9621. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49381-6_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49381-6_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49380-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49381-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics