Abstract
As a part of smart-buildings, indoor localisation systems – alternative to Global Positioning System localisation – bring constantly improving results. Several localisation methods works with a horizontal localisation error less than few meters. However, for small suburban houses, horizontal localisation is not as important as detection of the current floor, which in is still a challenge in multi-storey buildings. This paper compares several approaches that can be used in fingerprinting-based floor detection systems. The tests include the following fingerprints: pressure measures, Wi-Fi signals, and two generations of cellular networks signals. The tests have been done in the suburban 3-storey building with underdeveloped Wi-Fi and cellular infrastructure. Notwithstanding, the floor detection based on Received Signal Strength from both infrastructures reached from 98 to 100 %. Additionally, we showed that differences in the number of measures and differences in the number of received signals were not a major factor that influenced on accuracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahriz, I., Oussar, Y., Denby, B., Dreyfus, G.: Carrier relevance study for indoor localization using GSM. In: 7th Workshop on Positioning Navigation and Communication (WPNC 2010), pp. 168–173, March 2010
Breiman, L.: Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32 (2001)
Brida, P., Cepel, P., Duha, J.: The accuracy of RSS based positioning in GSM networks. In: International Conference on Microwaves, Radar Wireless Communications, MIKON 2006, pp. 541–544, May 2006
Denby, B., Oussar, Y., Ahriz, I., Dreyfus, G.: High-performance indoor localization with full-band GSM fingerprints. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, ICC Workshops 2009, pp. 1–5, June 2009
Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 55(1), 119–139 (1997). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002200009791504X
Górak, R., Luckner, M.: Malfunction immune Wi–Fi localisation method. In: Núñez, M., Nguyen, N.T., Camacho, D., Trawinski, B. (eds.) ICCCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9329, pp. 328–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24069-5_31
Grzenda, M.: On the prediction of floor identification credibility in RSS-based positioning techniques. In: Ali, M., Bosse, T., Hindriks, K.V., Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7906, pp. 610–619. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38577-3_63
Grzenda, M.: Reduction of signal strength data for fingerprinting-based indoor positioning. In: Jackowski, K., Burduk, R., Walkowiak, K., Wozniak, M., Yin, H. (eds.) IDEAL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9375, pp. 387–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24834-9_45
He, N., Huo, J., Dong, Y., Li, Y., Yu, Y., Ren, Y.: Atmospheric pressure-aware seamless 3-d localization and navigation for mobile internet devices. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 17(2), 172–178 (2012)
Karwowski, J., Okulewicz, M., Legierski, J.: Application of particle swarm optimization algorithm to neural network training process in the localization of the mobile terminal. In: Iliadis, L., Papadopoulos, H., Jayne, C. (eds.) EANN 2013, Part I. CCIS, vol. 383, pp. 122–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41013-0_13
Korbel, P., Wawrzyniak, P., Grabowski, S., Krasinska, D.: Locfusion API - programming interface for accurate multi-source mobile terminal positioning. In: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 819–823, September 2013
Papapostolou, A., Chaouchi, H.: Scene analysis indoor positioning enhancements. Annales des Télécommunications 66, 519–533 (2011)
Roos, T., Myllymaki, P., Tirri, H., Misikangas, P., Sievanen, J.: A probabilistic approach to WLAN user location estimation. Int. J. Wireless Inf. Netw. 9(3), 155–164 (2002)
Tian, Y., Denby, B., Ahriz, I., Roussel, P., Dreyfus, G.: Hybrid indoor localization using GSM fingerprints, embedded sensors and a particle filter. In: 2014 11th International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS), pp. 542–547, August 2014
Varshavsky, A., LaMarca, A., Hightower, J., de Lara, E.: The skyloc floor localization system. In: Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, PerCom 2007, pp. 125–134, March 2007
Wang, J., Hu, A., Liu, C., Li, X.: A floor-map-aided wifi/pseudo-odometry integration algorithm for an indoor positioning system. Sensors 15(4), 7096 (2015). http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/15/4/7096
Xiang, Z., Song, S., Chen, J., Wang, H., Huang, J., Gao, X.G.: A wireless LAN-based indoor positioning technology. IBM J. Res. Dev. 48(5–6), 617–626 (2004)
Acknowledgment
The research is supported by the National Centre for Research and Development, grant No. PBS2/B3/24/2014, application No. 208921.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luckner, M., Górak, R. (2016). Comparison of Floor Detection Approaches for Suburban Area. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawiński, B., Fujita, H., Hong, TP. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9622. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49390-8_76
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49390-8_76
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49389-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49390-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)