Skip to main content

The Data Quality Framework for the Estonian Public Sector and Its Evaluation

Establishing a Systematic Process-Oriented Viewpoint on Cross-Organizational Data Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXXV

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TLDKS,volume 10680))

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a data quality framework for public sector organizations is proposed. It includes a data quality methodology for the public sector organizations (DQMP) and a complex of state-level activities for improving data quality in the public sector. The DQMP comprises a data quality model, a data quality maturity model, and a data quality management process. Based on this framework, two guidelines have been developed: a data quality handbook for public sector organizations and guidelines for improving data quality in the public sector. The results of the evaluation of the data quality handbook on three basic Estonian state registers highlight lessons learned and confirm the usefulness of the approach. The paper aims at researchers investigating data quality in various environments and practitioners involved in information systems management, development, and maintenance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AbouZahr, C., Boerma, T.: Health information systems - the foundations of public health. Bull. World Health Organ. 83(8), 578–583 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., Hameed, K.: Key dimensions for cloud data governance. In: Proceedings of FiCloud 2016 - the 4th International IEEE Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud. IEEE Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Ruithe, M., Benkhelifa, E., Hameed, K.: A conceptual framework for designing data governance for cloud computing. In: Shakshuki, E.M. (ed.) Proceedings of FNC 2016 - the 11th International Conference on Future Networks and Communications. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 94, pp. 160–167. Elsevier (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bank of England: Statistics and Regulatory Data Division. Data Quality Framework, March 2014. http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/statistics/Documents/about/dqf.pdf

  5. Barrett, K., Greene, R.: The causes, costs and consequences of bad government data. In: GOVERNING, 24 June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Audit Office of Estonia: Maintenance and Development of Information Systems in Area of Government of Ministry of the Environment. Tallinn (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bordbar, B., Draheim, D., Horn, M., Schulz, I., Weber, G.: Integrated model-based software development, data access, and data migration. In: Briand, L., Williams, C. (eds.) MODELS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3713, pp. 382–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11557432_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, L., Zhu, Y.: The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Sci. J. 14(2) (2015). http://datascience.codata.org/article/10.5334/dsj-2015-002/

  9. Cong, G., Fan, W., Geerts, F., Jia, X., Ma, S.: Improving data quality - consistency and accuracy. In: Proceedings of VLDB 2007 - the 33rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. VLDB Endowment, pp. 315–326 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curristine, T., Lonti, Z., Joumard, I.: Improving public sector efficiency - challenges and opportunities. OECD J. Budgeting 7(1), 1–41 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards Deming, W.: Out of the Crisis. MIT, Center for Advanced Educational Services (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Desouza, K., Smith, K.: Big Data for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Draheim, D.: The service-oriented metaphor deciphered. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 4, 253–275 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Draheim, D.: Smart business process management. In: 2011 BPM and Workflow Handbook, Digital Edition. Future Strategies, Workflow Management Coalition, pp. 207–223 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Draheim, D., Nathschläger, C.: A context-oriented synchronization approach. In: Electronic Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Personalized Access, Profile Management, and Context Awareness: Databases (PersDB 2008) in Conjunction with the 34th VLDB Conference, pp. 20–27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dun & Bradstreet: Transparent Government Demands Robust Data Quality (2009). http://www.dnb.com/content/dam/english/dnb-solutions/sales-and-marketing/transparent_government_demands_data_quality.pdf

  17. Estonian Information System Authority (RIA). Three-level IT Baseline Security System ISKE. https://www.ria.ee/en/iske-en.html

  18. Estonian Parliamant. Population Register Act. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/523032017001/consolide

  19. Estonian Parliamant: System of Address Details (In Estonian). https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/113102015002

  20. Estonian Parliament: Land Cadastre Act, Estonia (2016). https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/522062016005/consolide

  21. Estonian Parliament: Personal Data Protection Act. Estonia, 16 January 2016. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/507032016001/consolide

  22. Estonian Parliament: Population Register Act, Estonia, 01 February 2016. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/Riigikogu/act/504022016005/consolide

  23. Estonian State Information Management System Authority (RIHA). https://www.ria.ee/en/administration-system-of-the-state-information-system.html

  24. European Commission: EU eGovernment Action Plan 2016–2020 - Accelerating the digital transformation of government (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=15268

  25. EURIM: Improving the Evidence Base - The Quality of Information Status Report and Recommendations of the EURIM Sub-group on the Quality of Information (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. European Parliament: DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/1148 OF The European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2016 concerning measures for a high common level of security of network and information systems across the Union (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. European Parliament: Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, 24 October 1995

    Google Scholar 

  28. European Parliament: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC, 27 April 2016

    Google Scholar 

  29. Foresight University: Shewhart-Deming’s Learning and Quality Cycle. http://www.foresightguide.com/chapter-8/shewhart-and-deming/

  30. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. HarperCollins Publishers, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  31. IBM: The IBM Data Governance Council Maturity Model - Building a Roadmap for Effective Data Governance. IBM Corporation (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. International Monetary Fund: Data Quality Assessment Framework - Generic Framework (2012). http://dsbb.imf.org/images/pdfs/dqrs_Genframework.pdf

  33. International Organization for Standardization: International Standard ISO/IEC 38500:2015. Information technology - Governance of IT for the Organisation, ISO (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. International Organization for Standardization: International Standard ISO/IEC 25012:2008. Software Engineering - Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Data quality model, ISO/IEC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kayyali, B., Knott, D., Van Kuiken, S.: The Big-Data Revolution in US Health Care - Accelerating Value and Innovation, April 2013. http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/healthcare-systems-and-services/our-insights/the-big-data-revolution-in-us-health-care

  36. Khatri, V., Brown, C.V.: Designing data governance. Commun. ACM 53(1), 148–152 (2010). ACM Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Linros, J., Lauk, M., Tepandi, J., Kähari, V.: AS PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisors. Data Quality Study - Final Report (in Estonian). Information System Authority, 26 August 2016. https://www.ria.ee/public/publikatsioonid/Andmekvaliteedi_uuringu_lopparuanne.pdf

  38. Loshin, D.: The Practitioner’s Guide to Data Quality Improvement. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. National Audit Office of Estonia: Population Data in National Registers (in Estonian). Tallinn (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Otto, B.: Data governance. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 3, 241–244 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Piho, G., Tepandi, J.: Business domain modelling with business archetypes and archetype patterns. In: Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, XXIV (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Development, version 1.3. http://cmmiinstitute.com/cmmi-models

  44. Thomas, G.: The DGI Data Governance Framework. The Data Governance Institute (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. US Agency for International Development: Performance Monitoring & Evaluation Tips Conducting Data Quality Assessments, USAID (2010). http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadw118.pdf

  46. Tountopoulos, V., Felici, M., Pannetrat, A., Catteddu, D., Pearson, S.: Interoperability analysis of accountable data governance in the cloud. In: Cleary, F., Felici, M. (eds.) CSP 2014. CCIS, vol. 470, pp. 77–88. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12574-9_7

    Google Scholar 

  47. Weber, K., Otto, B., Osterle, H.: One size does not fit all - a contingency approach to data governance. ACM J. Data Inf. Q. 1(1), 4 (2009). ACM Press

    Google Scholar 

  48. Weill, P., Ross, J.W.: IT governance - How top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  49. World Wide Web Consortium: Data Quality Vocabulary - W3C First Public Working Draft 25 June 2015. https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-vocab-dqv-20150625/

  50. Xu, H.: Factor analysis of critical success factors for data quality. In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2013 - the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaak Tepandi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tepandi, J. et al. (2017). The Data Quality Framework for the Estonian Public Sector and Its Evaluation. In: Hameurlain, A., Küng, J., Wagner, R., Sakr, S., Razzak, I., Riyad, A. (eds) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXXV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10680. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56121-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56121-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56120-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56121-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics