Skip to main content

Remarks on Unrounded Degressively Proportional Allocation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXI

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TCCI,volume 11290))

Abstract

The Lisbon Treaty has legally endorsed degressiveness as a principle of distributing indivisible goods. Yet the principle has been implemented in executive acts with insufficient precision. As a result, it cannot be unambiguously applied in practice. Therefore many theoretical studies have been conducted aiming at a more precisely defined formulation of the principle so that resulting allocations could be explicitly derived from primary rules. This paper belongs to such research stream. It aims at submitting a formal definition of unrounded degressively proportional distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Detailed mathematical analysis of the allocation functions the reader will find in [9].

  2. 2.

    Haman argues that the value of parameter u can be then interpreted as a measure of degression of allocations. A smaller value of this parameter indicates more degression of the allocation. The smaller the value u, the more degressive allocation (closer to equal division). A given allocation is less degressive (closer to a proportional allocation), as u approaches unity. Haman continues the research into degressive proportionality in a weak case (UDP) and in a strong case (RDP) [11].

References

  1. Treaty of Lisbon. Official J. Eur. Union. C 306, 50 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lamassoure, A., Severin, A.: Report on the composition of the European Parliament. Committee on Constitutional Affairs, A6-0351 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maciuk, A.: Przykłady podziałów mandatów do Parlamentu Europejskiego spełniających warunki Traktatu Lizbońskiego [Examples of the divisions of seats to the European Parliament that meet the conditions of the Treaty of Lisbon]. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonometria 33(198), 85–96 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Florek, J.: A numerical method to determine a degressive proportional distribution of seats in the European Parliament. Math. Soc. Sci. 63(2), 121–129 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Łyko, J., Rudek, R.: A fast exact algorithm for the allocation of seats for the EU Parliament. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 5284–5291 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grimmett, G.R.: European apportionment via the Cambridge Compromise. Math. Soc. Sci. 63(2), 68–73 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pukelsheim, F.: A parliament of degressive representativeness? Institut für Mathematik, Universität Augsburg, Preprint Nr 015/2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pukelsheim, F.: Putting citizens first: representation and power in the European Union. In: Cichocki, M., Życzkowski, K. (eds.) Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union, pp. 235–253. Ashgate, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Słomczyński, W., Życzkowski, K.: Mathematical aspects of degressive proportionality. Math. Soc. Sci. 63(2), 94–101 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Haman, J.: Degresywnie proporcjonalny podział mandatów w Parlamencie Europejskim [Degressively proportional division of seats in the European Parliament]. Decyzje 8, 53–78 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haman, J.: The concept of degressive and progressive proportionality and its normative and descriptive applications. Studies of Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0019. (in print)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gualtieri, R., Trzaskowski, R.: Report on the composition of the European Parliament with a view to the 2014 elections. A7-0041/2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Report on the composition of the European Parliament (28 January 2018) (2017/2054(INL) – 2017/0900(NLE)). http://www.europarl.europa.eu

  14. Pukelsheim, F.: Proportional Representation. Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkadiusz Maciuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cegiełka, K., Dniestrzański, P., Łyko, J., Maciuk, A. (2018). Remarks on Unrounded Degressively Proportional Allocation. In: Nguyen, N., Kowalczyk, R., Mercik, J., Motylska-Kuźma, A. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11290. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58464-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58464-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58463-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58464-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics