Skip to main content

A Comparison of Techniques for Evaluating Centered Forms

  • Chapter
Perspectives on Enclosure Methods
  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

Second-order enc10sures for a function’s range can be computed with centered forms, which involve a so-called slope vector. In this paper we discuss several techniques for determining such vectors and compare them with respect to tightness of the resulting enc1osure. We advocate that a two-stage slope vector computation with symbolic preprocessing is optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Alefeld and J. Herzberger. Introduetion to Interval Gomputations. Academic Press, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Bischof, A. Carle, P. Hovland, P. Khademi, and A. Mauer. ADIFOR 2.0 user’s guide. Technical Memorandum ANL/MCS-TM-192, Argonne National Laboratory, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, 1995. Revised June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Bliek. Fast evaluation of partial derivatives and interval slopes. Reliable Comput., 3:259–268, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G. F. Corliss and L. B. Rall. Adaptive, self-validating quadrature. SIAM J. Sei. Stat. Comput., 8(5):831–847, 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Griewank. Evaluating Derivatives: Prineiples and Teehniques of Algorithmie Differentiation. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. B. Kearfott. Rigorous Global Seareh: Continuous Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Neumaier. Interval Methods for Systems of Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. J. B. Oliveira. New slope methods for sharper interval functions and a note on Fischer’s acceleration method. Reliable Comput., 2(3):299–320, 1996.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L. B. Rall. Automatie Differentiation: Teehniques and Applieations. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 120. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Ratz. Automatie Slope Computation and its Applieation in Nonsmooth Global Optimization. Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany, 1998. Habilitationsschrift.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lang, B. (2001). A Comparison of Techniques for Evaluating Centered Forms. In: Kulisch, U., Lohner, R., Facius, A. (eds) Perspectives on Enclosure Methods. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6282-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6282-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83590-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6282-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics