Skip to main content

Contrasting Models for Visualisation (Seeing the wood through the trees)

  • Conference paper
Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems ’99

Part of the book series: Eurographics ((EUROGRAPH))

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

It is widely recognised that design quality is influenced by the perspective adopted by developers. In the case of formal methods such perspectives are frequently offered by identifying and/or developing appropriate models, from which requirements and systems can be expressed and even verified. In addition, to this there is a growing recognition that selecting and employing a model is an activity which is less dependent upon formal adequacy and more dependent upon ease of use. In this paper we examine and assess factors relevant to design quality that are apparent in comparing two alternative modelling approaches. The specific case study used is that of a system for visualising and manipulating a logical tree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Austin and G I Parkin. Formal methods: a survey. Technical report, 1993. National Physical Laboratory, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jonathan P. Bowen and M. Hinchey. Ten commandments of formal methods. IEEE Computer, April 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Britton, S. Jones, and W. Lam. Separating the system interface from its internal state: an alternate structure for Z specifications. In Siddiqi [15], pages 87 — 102. ISBN 0 86339 7948.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Cohen. A rejustification of the need for formal notations. IEEE Software Engineering Journal, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Craigen, S. Gerhart, and T. Ralston. An international survey of industrial application of formal methods. Technical report, 1993. NISTGCR 93 626.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. M. Dearden and M. D. Harrison. Abstract models for HCI. The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, (46): 151–177, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Dix. Formal Methods for Interactive Systems. Academic Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Duke, G. Faconti, M. Harrison, and Paterno F. Unifying views of interactors. In Advanced Visual Interfaces ’84, pages 143–152. ACM Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. J. Duke and M. D. Harrison. Mapping user requirements to implementations. Software Engineering Jounal, 10 (1): 13–20, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kotze. A generic modeling framework for interactive authoring support environments. In Siddiqi [15], pages 14 — 31. ISBN 0 86339 7948.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. G. Leveson. Intent specification: An approach to building human-centered specification. In ICRE’98, pages 204–213. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Markopoulos. Comparing non deterministic models of tasks and devices. In Siddiqi [15], pages 70 — 85. ISBN 0 86339 7948.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. F. Monk, M. B. Curry, and P. C. Wright. Why industry doesn’t use the wonderful notations we researchers have given them to reason about their design. In D. J. Gilmore, R.L. Winder, and F. Detienne, editors, User-centred requirements for software engineering, pages 185–188. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. R. Roast and J. I. Siddiqi. Using the template model to analyse directory visualisation. Interacting with Computers, 9 (2): 155–172, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. I. Siddiqi, editor. BCS-FRCS Workshop on Formal Aspects of the Human Computer Interface, Sheffield Hallam University, 1998. SHU Press, 1998. ISBN 0 86339 7948.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. I. Siddiqi and C. R. Roast. Formally assessing visual and textual notations for supporting program modification. Technical report, Sheffield Hallam University, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Sufrin and J. He. Specification, refinement and analysis of interactive processes. In M. D. Harrison and H. W. Thimbleby, editors, Formal Methods in Human Computer Interaction, pages 153–200. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. W. Thimbleby. Delaying commitment. Technical Report YCS 90, University of York, Computer Science Dept., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.M. Wing. A specifier’s introduction to formal methods. IEEE Computer, pages 8–22, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Roast, C., Siddiqi, J. (1999). Contrasting Models for Visualisation (Seeing the wood through the trees). In: Duke, D., Puerta, A. (eds) Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems ’99. Eurographics. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6815-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6815-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83405-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6815-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics