Skip to main content

A Model of Group Choice for Artificial Society

  • Conference paper
Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 2
  • 297 Accesses

Abstract

We investigate a model for determining a group choice in an artificial society where each agent determines its own opinion or attitude by communicating with other agents in the neighbor. In the model, (in contrast to Majority Network where agent decide its own opinion by majority in the neighbor) agent does not change opinion, but rather change its attitude (active/inactive) to the opinions depending upon whether or not the opinion conflict with that of majority in the neighbor. In the model, active state affects positively(negatively) through positive(negative) arcs. Active state of an agent means that the agent expresses the opinion in public or acts up to the opinion. If the net effect to an agent from active agents in the neighbor is positive, the agent becomes active; hence active state propagate through the network. We discuss the well-known paradox of voting as an illustrative example for the model. We also conducted simulations on the model to make clear how some parameters can drastically affect the system level behavior of the model. Some implications to the real human society as well as artificial society will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Casti, Would-Be Worlds, John Wiley Sons, to appear 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Epstein, and R. Axtell, Growing Societies, MIT Press, to appear 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Wooldridge and N.R. Jennings Eds., Intelligent Agents, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Steels Eds., The Biology and Technology of Intelligent Autonomous Agents, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Durret, Lecture Notes on Particle Systems and Percolation, Wadsworth, INc., California, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Pljak and M. Sura, “On Periodical Behaviour in Societies with Symmetric Influence, ” Combinatorica, No. 3, pp. 119–121, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Coles and M. Tchuente, “Iterative Behaviour of Generalized Majority Functions,” Mathematical Social Sciences, No. 4, pp. 197–204, 1983.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Pljak, “Neural Networks Via Linear Programming and Convexity,” RUTCOR Research Report, RRR # 69–90, December, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Wolfram, Cellular Automata and Complexity, Collected Papers, Addison-Wesley, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. A. Kauffman, The Origin of Order, Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Agur, “Fixed Points of Majority Rule Cellular Automata with Application to Plasticity and Precision of the Immune Syste” Complex Systems, 2, pp. 351–357, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Ishida, “Note on Immune Network and Majority Network,” NAIST Technical Report, NAIST-IS-TR 95031, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. K. Jerne, “The Immune System” Sci. Am. Vol. 229, No. 1, pp. 52–60, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. H. Richter, “Complexity and Regulation of the Immune System: The Network Approach,” in Proc. Working Conf. on System Theory in Immunology, pp. 219–227, Rome, Italy, May 1978 ( Springer-Verlag, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Ishida, “ Fully Distributed Diagnosis by PDP Learning Algorithm: Towards Immune Network PDP Model,” Proc. of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 90, San Diego, pp. 777–782, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Ishida and F. Mizessyn, “Learning Algorithms on Immune Network Model: Application to Sensor Diagnosis,” Proc. of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 92, pp. 33–38, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Ishida, An Immune Network Model and Its Applications to Process Diagnosis, Systems and Computers in Japan, vol. 24,no. 6, pp 38–46, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Ishida and Y. Tokimasa, “Data Reconcilliation Combined with Data Evaluation by Sensor Networks with Immune Net Metaphor,” Proc. of the 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 96, to appear 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. G. Mirkin, Group Choice, John Wiley Sons, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ishida, Y. (1996). A Model of Group Choice for Artificial Society. In: Asama, H., Fukuda, T., Arai, T., Endo, I. (eds) Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems 2. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66942-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66942-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66944-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66942-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics