Skip to main content

Learning and Belief Dissemination Through Co-action

  • Chapter
Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress

Abstract

The paper presents results of simulations on belief dissemination in an universe where agents are situated on an environment. Contrary to most papers on belief dissemination, we propose that the environment has an impact on the interaction of agents and on their learning. We compare two main ways of learning: when agents can and cannot perceive their environment to change their beliefs. We also consider that agents are heterogeneous in their tendency to follow the beliefs of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Axelrod R (1997) The dissemination of culture — A model with local convergence and global polarization. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 203–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P, Redner S (2005) Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. Physical Review E 71:, art. no.-036101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deffuant G Amblard, F, Weisbuch G, Faure T (2002) How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model. J Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 5: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html. URL

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato, S, Stauffer D (2005). Computer Simulations of Opinions and Their Reactions to Extreme Events [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Galam S (1997). Rational group decision making: A random field Ising model at T=O. PhysicaA. 238:66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002), Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation. J Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 5: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.Uk/5/3/2.html. URL

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living, Kluwer Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscivic S (1976) Social influence and social change. Academic Press, London New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D (2005) Sociophysics Simulations II: Opinion Dynamics [online].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sznajd-Weron K, Sznajd J (2000) Opinion evolution in closed community. International Journal of Modern Physics C 11: 1157–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rouchier, J., Shiina, H. (2007). Learning and Belief Dissemination Through Co-action. In: Takahashi, S., Sallach, D., Rouchier, J. (eds) Advancing Social Simulation: The First World Congress. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73167-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-73167-2_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-73150-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-73167-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics