Abstract
For years, computer scientists have been dreaming of innovating Internet in terms of performance, reliability, energy efficiency, security, and so on. However, it is nearly impossible to carry out practical large-scale experiments and verification, since new software and programs are hardly evaluated on the current Internet environment where routers and switches are totally closed. In this context, Software Defined Networking (SDN) concept has been introduced to deploy software-oriented and open programmable network coupled tightly with traditional Internet (non-SDN) environment. This tight integration results in easy and efficient deployment of SDN domains into non-SDN infrastructure, but it is also required that integrated management methods for SDN and non-SDN be developed. This paper proposes how SDN and non-SDN can be managed in an integrated manner in terms of two aspects: (1) non-SDN driven management approach and (2) SDN oriented management approach, in order to achieve reliable Future Internet environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Clark D (1988) The design philosophy of the DARPA internet protocols. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 18(4):106–114
McKeown N, Anderson T, Balakrishnan H, Parulkar G, Peterson L, Rexford J, Shenker S, Turner S (2008) OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 38(2):69–74
Levin D, Wundsam A, Heller B, Handigol N, Feldmann A (2012) Logically centralized? State distribution trade-offs in software defined networks. In: 1st workshop on hot topics in software defined networks, pp 1–6
Kim D (2008) User oriented virtual network management based on dvNOC environment. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 8(10):59–65
SATW Initiative. http://groups.geni.net/geni/ticket/913
K-GENI Initiative. http://groups.geni.net/geni/wiki/K-GENI
IEEE 802.1ag Standard. http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1ag-2007.pdf
Pol R (2012) Ethernet OAM integration in OpenFlow. In: 27th NORDUnet conference
Song S, Hong S, Guan X, Choi B-Y, Choi C (2013) NEOD: network embedded on-line disaster management framework for software defined networking. In: IFIP/IEEE international symposium on integrated network management. Accepted for publication
Ham J, Dijkstra F, Grosso P, Pol R, Toonk A, Laat C (2008) A distributed topology information system for optical networks based on the semantic Web. Opt Switch Networking 5(2–3):85–93
OpenFlow Reference. http://www.openflow.org/wp/tag/reference-implementation/
NOX Controller. http://www.noxrepo.org/
Beacon Controller. https://openflow.stanford.edu/display/Beacon/Home
MAESTRO Platform. http://code.google.com/p/maestro-platform/
Trema Controller. http://trema.github.com/trema/
RouteFlow Controller. https://sites.google.com/site/routeflow/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht(Outside the USA)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, D., Gil, JM., Wang, G., Kim, SH. (2013). Integrated SDN and Non-SDN Network Management Approaches for Future Internet Environment. In: Park, J., Ng, JY., Jeong, HY., Waluyo, B. (eds) Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 240. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6738-6_64
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6738-6_64
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6737-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6738-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)