Skip to main content

Product Information Retrieval on the Web: An Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the consumers’ perception of on-line product search using a questionnaire-based survey. We identify that the information retrieval activity of the purchase process can be performed with three Web applications: a search engine, a price comparison service, and a Web shop. The study underlines the need for linked product data as proposed by the Semantic Web. We argue that linked data will result in easier product search on the Web for the consumer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alba J, Lynch J, Weitz B, Janiszewski C, Lutz R, Sawyer A, Wood S (1997) Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J Mark 61(3):38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beatty SE, Smith SM (1987) External search effort: an investigation across several product categories. J Consum Res 14(1):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data - the story so far. Int J Semantic Web Inf Syst 5(3):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloch PH, Sherrell DL, Ridgway NM (1986) Consumer search: an extended framework. J Consum Res 13(1):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davies J, Studer R, Warren P (eds) (2006) Semantic web technologies: trends and research in ontology-based systems. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis I (2012) Productdb. http://productdb.org/. Accessed 24 Feb 2012

  7. Detlor B, Sproule S, Gupta C (2003) Pre-purchase online information seeking: search versus browse. J Electron Commer Res 4(2):72–84

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flavián-Blanco C, Gurrea-Sarasa R, Orús-Sanclemente C (2011) Analyzing the emotional outcomes of the online search behavior with search engines. Comput Hum Behav 27(1):540–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Google: doubleclick ad planner by google (2011). http://www.google.com/adplanner/static/top1000/. Accessed 12 Feb 2012

  10. Häubl G, Dellaert BGC, Donkers B (2010) Tunnel vision: local behavioral influences on consumer decisions in product search. Mark Sci 29(3):438–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hepp M (2011) Goodrelations— the most powerful web vocabulary for e-commerce. http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/. Accessed 16 Feb 2012

  12. Huang P, Lurie NH, Mitra S (2009) Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. J Mark 73(2):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koufaris M, Kambil A, LaBarbera PA (2001) Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: an empirical study. Int. J. Electron. Commerce 6(2):115–138

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li B, Ghose A, Ipeirotis PG (2011) Towards a theory model for product search. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on world wide web WWW 2011, ACM, New York, pp. 327–336

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int J Electron Commerce 7(3):101–134

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rangaswamy A, Giles CL, Seres S (2009) A strategic perspective on search engines: thought candies for practitioners and researchers. J Interact Mark 23(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vandic D, Dam J V, Frasincar F (2012) Faceted product search powered by the semantic web. Decision Support Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.02.010

  18. Wikipedia: comparison shopping agent— wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2012). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_shopping_agent. Accessed 24 Feb 2012

  19. Wikipedia: price comparison service— wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2012). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_comparison_service. Accessed 12 Feb 2012

  20. Yee PL, Hsieh-Yee I, Pierce GR, Grome R, Schantz L (2004) Self-evaluative intrusive thoughts impede successful searching on the internet. Comput Hum Behav 20(1):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabri Bouzidi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Questionnaire

The table below contains the questions from the survey. For questions 1−6, for each product group the subjects indicate whether they agree with the statement on a five-point Likert-scale, with 1 being `strongly disagree’, 3 being `neutral’, and 5 represents `strongly agree’. The questions 1−3 refer to the ease-of-search, while questions of 4−6 relate to the use of the information retrieval tools. Questions 7−9 are intended for the identification of characteristics of the respondents.

Questions

Variable

1.

When i dont know exactly what to buy, i find it easy to locate the relvant product information when searching for:

Clothing(locate product information, low need specificity)

Smart –phone(locate product information, low need specificity)

Vacations(locate product information, low need specificity)

2.

When i do know what product to buy,i find it easy to locate the relevant product information when searching for:

Clothing(locate product information, low need specificity)

Smart –phone(locate product information, low need specificity)

Vacations(locate product information, low need specificity)

3.

When i do know what product to buy,i find it easy to locate the shops that sell it when searching for:

Clothing(locate shops)

Smart-phones(locate shops)

Vacations(locate shops)

4.

I use a search engine(e.g., Google)when searching for:

Clothing(Search engine)

Smart-phone(Search engine)

Vacations(Search engine)

5.

I use a price comparison service(e.g.,Google shopping)when searching for:

Clothing(price comparison service)

Smart-phone(price comparison service)

Vacations(price comparison service)

6.

I use a specific web store that i know of when searching for

Clothing (Web shop)

Smart-phone(Web shop)

Vacations(Web shop)

7.

Your gender

Gender

8.

Your age

Age

9.

Your education level

Education

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bouzidi, S., Vandic, D., Frasincar, F., Kaymak, U. (2014). Product Information Retrieval on the Web: An Empirical Study. In: Uden, L., Wang, L., Corchado Rodríguez, J., Yang, HC., Ting, IH. (eds) The 8th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7287-8_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7287-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics