Skip to main content

Six Roles of Documents in Professionals’ Work

  • Chapter
ECSCW ’99

Abstract

Documents are used extensively by professionals in their execution of their own work and to share information with others. Professionals use and manage their documents in ways that are woven into their work activities and leave most of the context unsaid because the documents are understood as belonging to a certain ongoing activity. Contrary to this, organisations have a strong interest in storing information in less persondependent ways than simply relying on their employees’ memory and personal files. To support document management effectively we need to balance the individual professionals’ focus on their current activities against the long-term interests of the organisation, and we need a fuller understanding of the affordances and constraints of documents. This study identifies six roles documents play in professionals’ work, namely that documents serve: (1) as personal work files, (2) as reminders of things to do, (3) to share information with some yet withhold it from others, (4) to convey meaning, (5) to generate new meaning, and (6) to mediate contacts among people. Painstakingly standardised and very time-consuming methods are required for documents to convey meaning but such efforts are rarely considered worthwhile compared to relying on other document roles or rework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, M. S. (1996): ‘Definitional and contextual issues in organizational and group memories’, Information Technology & People, 9,1, pp. 10–24.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981): The dialogic imagination: four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (edited by M. Holquist), University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986): Speech genres and other late essays (edited by C. Emerson and M. Holquist), University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. and Bødker, S. (1997): ‘Constructing common information spaces’, in J. Hughes, T. Rodden, W. Prinz and K. Schmidt (eds.): ECSCW’97: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on CSCW, Kluver, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L. and Schmidt, K. (1989): ‘CSCW: four characters in search of a context’, in: EC-CSCW’89: Proceedings of the First European Conference on CSCW. Reprinted in J. M. Bowers and S. D. Benford (eds.): Studies in Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Theory, Practice and Design, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991, pp. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreau, D. K. (1995): ‘Context as a factor in personal information management systems’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46,5, pp. 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreau, D. and Nardi, B. A. (1995): ‘Finding and reminding’, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 27,3, pp. 39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, L. M., Jeffries, R., O’Day, V. L., Paepcke, A. and Wharton, C. (1993): ‘Where did you put it? Issues in the design and use of a group memory’, in: Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP INTERCHI’93 Conference, ACM Press, New York, pp. 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikson, T. K. and Frinking, E. J. (1993): Preserving the present: Toward viable electronic records, Sdu Publishers, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. C. (1996): ‘STAIRS redux: Thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47,1, pp. 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, J., Suchman, L. and Trigg, R. H. (1996): ‘Reflections on a work-oriented design project’, Human-Computer Interaction, 11, pp. 237–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S. and Duguid, P. (1996): ‘The social life of documents’, First Monday, 1,1, http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issuel/documents/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945): ‘As we may think’, Atlantic Monthly, 176,1, pp. 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, P. H. (1997): ‘Towards information exploration support for engineering designers’, in S. Ganesan (ed.): Advances in Concurrent Engineering — CE97, Technomic, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, pp. 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, D. O. (1991): ‘Conceptual organization and retrieval of text by historians: The role of memory and metaphor’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42,9, pp. 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, A. and Wagner, I. (1995): ‘Fragmented exchange: Disarticulation and the need for regionalized communication spaces’, in H. Marmolin, Y. Sundblad and K. Schmidt (eds.): ECSCW’95: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on CSCW, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, I. (1982): ‘Human aspects of office filing: Implications for the electronic office’, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting, Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, pp. 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fertig, S., Freeman, E. and Gelernter, D. (1996): ‘“Finding and reminding” reconsidered’, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 28,1, pp. 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967): ‘“Good” organizational reasons for “bad” clinic records’, in H. Garfinkel: Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 186–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. D. (1997): ‘It’s 10 a.m. Do you know where your documents are? The nature and scope of information retrieval problems in business’, Information Processing & Management, 33,1, pp. 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. and Sellen, A. (1995): ‘Collaborative tools and the practicalities of professional work at the International Monetary Fund’, in: Proceedings of the ACM CHI’95 Conference. ACM Press, New York, pp. 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzum, M. (1993): ‘Information retrieval in a work setting: A case study of the documentation part of chemists’ work’, in J. P. Bansler, K. Bødker, F. Kensing, J. Nørbjerg and J. Pries-Heje (eds.): Proceedings of the 16th IRIS. Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, DIKU report 93/16, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, pp. 786–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzum, M. (1995): ‘Computer support for document management in the Danish central government’, Information Infrastructure and Policy, 4,2, pp. 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, G., Hutchins, R. D. and Galford, R. R. (1966): ‘Characteristics and use of personal indexes maintained by scientists and engineers in one university’, American Documentation, 17,2, pp. 71–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. and Goldberg, A. (1977): ‘Personal dynamic media’, IEEE Computer, 10,3, pp. 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, A. (1994): ‘The marks are on the knowledge worker’, in: Proceedings of the ACM CHI’94 Conference, ACM Press, New York, pp. 186–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwasnik, B. H. (1991): ‘The importance of factors that are not document attributes in the organisation of personal documents’, Journal of Documentation, 47,4, pp. 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansdale, M. and Edmonds, E. (1992): ‘Using memory for events in the design of personal filing systems’, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, pp. 97–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986): ‘Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands’, Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6, pp. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. M. (1993): ‘Document reuse and document systems’, Electronic Publishing, 6,4, pp. 339–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. M. (1994): ‘Fixed or fluid? Document stability and new media’, in: ECHT’94: Proceedings of the European Conference on Hypertext, ACM Press, New York, pp. 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1983): ‘How do people organize their desks? Implications for the design of office information systems’, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1,1, pp. 99–112.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1975): ‘The manager’s job: Folklore and fact’, Harvard Business Review, 53,4, pp. 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B. A. and Barreau, D. (1997): ‘“Finding and reminding” revisited: Appropriate metaphors for file organization at the desktop’, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 29,1, pp. 76–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naur, P. (1985): ‘Programming as theory building’, Microprocessing & Microprogramming, 15,5, pp. 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perby, M.-L. (1987): ‘Computerization and the skill in local weather forecasting’, in G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn and M. Kyng (eds.): Computers and Democracy, Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinelli, T. E., Bishop, A. P., Barclay, R. O. and Kennedy, J. M. (1993): ‘The information-seeking behavior of engineers’, in A. Kent and C. M. Hall (eds.): Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, vol. 52,supplement 15, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 167–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaisant, C., Milash, B., Rose, A., Widoff, S. and Shneiderman, B. (1996): ‘Lifelines: Visualizing personal histories’, in: Proceedings of the ACM CHI’96 Conference, ACM Press, New York, pp. 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repo, A. J. (1987): ‘Economics of information’, in M. E. Williams (ed.): Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 22, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992): ‘Taking CSCW seriously — Supporting articulation work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1, pp. 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. and Simone, C. (1996): ‘Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW system design’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 5, pp. 155–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellen, A. and Harper, R. (1997): ‘Paper as an analytic resource for the design of new technologies’, in: Proceedings of the ACM CHI’97 Conference, ACM Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989): ‘Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science, 19, pp. 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, P. M. H. and Nagelhout, H. (1995): ‘Revolution in records: A strategy for information resources management and records management’, American Archivist, 58,1, pp. 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1993): Voices of the mind, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hertzum, M. (1999). Six Roles of Documents in Professionals’ Work. In: Bødker, S., Kyng, M., Schmidt, K. (eds) ECSCW ’99. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4441-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4441-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-5948-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-4441-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics