Skip to main content

Representation of Embedded Engineering Knowledge for Design

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98
  • 309 Accesses

Abstract

The selection of symbols and their accompanying environment are a central feature of a system for automated reasoning. If these symbols and relationships are part of a defined and proven mathematical system, then the properties of each relationship and of the system of interrelated relationships are known. If such a mathematical system is isomorphic to the engineering system, it constitutes a good representation for reasoning about the engineering system.

This paper presents some results of a ten-year study of such representations for artificial intelligence methods in engineering. The project as a whole explored graph theory, matroid theory and discrete linear programming. This paper demonstrates the viability of using systems of proven mathematical properties, which map closely to an engineering system, by showing the use of graph theory for a limited set of two systems only - truss structures and planetary gear systems.

By representing an engineering system as a graph, the knowledge for many engineering domains transforms to implicit properties embedded in the graph syntax. Reasoning with this knowledge is then achieved by applying proven algorithms of known properties to the graph. Reasoning about the engineering system with these algorithms will then give mathematically proven solutions.

The paper is written assuming that the reader is familiar with fundamental graph theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balabanian, N. and Bickart, T. A.: 1969, Electrical Network Theory, John Wiley, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. and Putnam, H.: 1960, A computing procedure for quantification theory, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 7(3), 201–221.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Erdman, A. G. (ed.): 1993, Modern Kinematics- Developments in the Last Forty Years, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenves, S. J. and Branin, F. H.: 1963, Network topological formulation of structural analysis, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 89(ST4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenstein, F.: 1971, An application of boolean algebra to the motion of epicyclic drives, ASME Journal Engineering for Industry,93, 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. S.: 1991, Preface, in J. S. Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘81, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laman, G.: 1970, On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 4, 331–340.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lovasz, L. and Yemini, Y.: 1982, On generic rigidity in the plane, SIAM Journal of Algebraic and Discrete Methods, 3(1), 91–98.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moisa, R., Preiss, K. and Shai, 0.: 1996, Truss analysis by graph theory,The 26th Israel Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Haifa, Israel, pp. 621–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash-Williams, C. St. J. A.: 1961, Edge-disjoint spanning trees of finite graphs, Journal London Mathematics Society, 36, 445–450.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. J.: 1971, Problem-Solving Methods in Artificial Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnas D. L.: 1985, Software aspects of strategic defense studies, Communications of the ACM, 28(12), 1326–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polomodov, B. and Gershon, T.: 1995, Matriculation Project: Checking the validity and analysis of planetary gear system, High School Ort Rehovot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiss, K. and Shai, O.: 1994, Deep artificial intelligence knowledge for truss analysis, The 25th Israel Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Haifa, Israel, pp. 207–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recski, A.: 1989, Matroid Theory and its Applications in Electric Network Theory and in Statics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A.: 1965, A machine oriented logic based on the resolution principle, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 12(1), 23–41.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shai, O.: 1997, Representation of Embedded Engineering Knowledge for Artificial Intelligence Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1981, The Sciences of the Artificial, 2nd edn, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, M. N. and Thulasiraman, K.: 1981, Graphs: Networks and Algorithms, John Wiley, NY.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shai, O., Preiss, K. (1998). Representation of Embedded Engineering Knowledge for Design. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5121-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics