Skip to main content

Comparing Mammogram Pairs for the Detection of Lesions

  • Chapter
Digital Mammography

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 13))

Abstract

We present an approach to detecting masses in temporal and bilateral (left-right) pairs of mammograms. Masses typically appear in a mammogram as well-defined, relatively bright regions. The converse is not true; by no means all relatively bright, circumscribed regions correspond to masses. Common to our approach to matching temporal and bilateral mammogram pairs is a representation of the nested structure of “salient” bright regions in a mammogram. The representation is described in Sections 2 and 3. In the case of temporal pairs, “salient” regions are extracted independently in two mammograms of the same breast, nominally the same view at two different times. Those that either appear in the later mammogram but not in the earlier one, or which have changed significantly between the two mammograms we seek to highlight. Similarly, in the case of matching bilateral pairs, salient regions that appear in only one of same-view left and right breast mammograms of the same patient, taken at approximately the same time we seek to highlight. A fuller version of this article appears as Chapter 13 of [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Bookstein. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. and Mach. Intell., 11:567–585, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. J. Cerneaz and J. M. Brady. Finding curvilinear structures in mammograms. In N. Ayache, editor, First International conference on computer vision, virtual reality and robotics in medicine, CVRMed’95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 372–382, Nice, France, April 1995 1995. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Guissin and J. M. Brady. Iso-intensity contours for edge detection. Technical Report OUEL 1935/92, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford, 0X1 3PJ, UK, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. P. Highnam and J. M. Brady. Mammographic image processing (In Preparation). Kluwer International, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. P. Highnam, B. J. Shepstone, and J. M. Brady. Mammograms at different compressions for the detection of breast cancer. In Symposium Mammographicum, Imperial College, London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Kimme, B. O’Loughlin, and J. Sklansky. Automatic detection of suspicious abnormalities in breast radiographs. In T. L. Kunii A. Klinger, K. S. Fu, editor, Data Structures, Computer Graphics and Pattern Recognition, pages 427–447. Academic Press, New York, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Lindeberg. Detecting salient blob-like image structures and their scales with a scale-space primal sketch. Int. Journal of Computer Vision, 11:283–318, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Miller and S. Astley. Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. Int. J. of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 7:1461–1476, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Novak. Transformation of the female breast during compression at mammography with special reference to the importance for localization of a lesion. PhD thesis, Department of Diagnostic Radiology at Lakarhuset and Karolinska Sjukhuset, Sweden, 1989. Acta Radiologica Supplement 371.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Vujovic, P. Bakic, and D. Bzrakovic. Detection of potentially cancerous signs by mammogram follow up. In K. Doi, M. L. Giger, R. M. Nishikawa, and R. A. Schmidt, editors, Digital Mammography 96, Chicago, June 1996. Elsevier Science B.V.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kok-Wiles, SL., Brady, M., Highnam, R. (1998). Comparing Mammogram Pairs for the Detection of Lesions. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics