Skip to main content

The Need to Standardize and Calibrate Databases of Digitized Mammograms

  • Chapter
Digital Mammography

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 13))

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

Different image processing algorithms, developed for the same purpose by different researchers, may now be compared by testing them on identical images from any of several annotated public domain databases of digitized mammograms. This paper considers the allied problem of variation in the performance of a specific algorithm on images from two different public domain databases: MIAS [1] and UCSF/LLNL [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J Suckling, J Parker, D R Dance, S Astley, I Hutt, C R M Boggis, I Ricketts, E Stamatakis, N Cerneaz, Siew-Li Kok, P Taylor, D Betal, and J Savage. The Mammographic Image Analysis Society Digital Mammogram Database. In Alastair G Gale, Sue M Astley, David R Dance, and Alistair Y Cairns, editors, Digital Mammography: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Digital Mammography, York, England, 10–12 July 1994, volume 1069 of Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, pages 375–378, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994. Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  2. University of California, San Francisco and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, (UCSF/LLNL). UCSF/LLNL High Resolution Digital Mammogram Library. Available from Ms Christine Skillern, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P. O. Box 808, L-452, Livermore, CA 94551, USA; e-mail: <mammo-db-help@llnl.gov>, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ramachandran Chandrasekhar and Yianni Attikiouzel. A Simple Method for Automatically Locating the Nipple on Mammograms. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 16(5):483–494, October 1997.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laura N Mascio. Private communication. Biomedical Image Processing, Engineering Research Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramachandran Chandrasekhar. Systematic Segmentation of Mammograms. PhD Thesis, Centre for Intelligent Information Processing Systems, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia, October 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chandrasekhar, R., Attikiouzel, Y. (1998). The Need to Standardize and Calibrate Databases of Digitized Mammograms. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_92

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics