Skip to main content

Grounding in Electronic Discussions: Standard (Threaded) Versus Anchored Discussion

  • Chapter
Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments

Part of the book series: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning ((CULS,volume 2))

Abstract

This paper identifies ‘grounding’ as an important process in asynchronous electronic meaning oriented discussions and tries to enhance and measure grounding activities, mutual understanding and the relevancy of messages. In this study, 190 first year students collaborated electronically with the goal of processing their literature together. Using a posttest only experimental design students were divided into a group that used a standard discussion board and one that used an annotation or ‘anchored discussion’ system. The used research instruments were: dialogue analysis, questionnaires and focus group interviews. Results will be analyzed and discussed in the light of the difference between the 2 conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andriessen, J., & Sandberg, J. (1999). Where is education heading and how about AI. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourgh (Ed.), Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31–63). Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier sience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim Brush, A. J., Bargeron, D., Grudin, J., Borning, A., & Gupta, A. (2002). Supporting interaction outside of class: Anchored discussion vs. discussion boards. Paper presented at the CSCL2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borovoy, R., Martin, F., & Resnick, R. (1999). Revealing common ground: Augmentation on the edges of interpretive communities. Paper presented at the CSCL, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., Traum, D. R., & Schneider, D. (1996). Grounding in multi-modal task-oriented collaboration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G., Sturgill, A., & Martin, W. (1999). Document centered peer collaborations. JCMC, 4 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the developement of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of educational computing research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (2000). Communication within on-line forums: the opportunities, the constraints and the value of a communicative approach. Computers & Education, 35(4), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. A. (1996). Affordances and constraints of electronic discussions. Paper presented at the Inkshed Working Conference, Hecla Island, Manitoba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makitalo, K., Hakkinen, P., Salo, P., & Jarvala, S. (2001). Analysing a mechanism of the common ground in web based interaction. Paper presented at the EARLI2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pol, v. d. (2001). Aansluiting in asynchrone elektronische discussies. Utrecht: dept. of educational science, Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonenboom, J. (2002). A template for discussing large texts on the web: the Pragglejaz site. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sringam, C., & Geer, R. (2000). An Investigation of an Instrument for Analysis of Student-Led Electronic Discussions. Paper presented at the ASCILITE2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, A. L. (2000). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning through Argumentation., Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, D., & Johnson, P. M. (1994). Experiences with Clare: A Computer Supported Collaborative Environment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., Simons, RJ. (2003). Grounding in Electronic Discussions: Standard (Threaded) Versus Anchored Discussion. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., Hoppe, U. (eds) Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0195-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics