Abstract
In this contribution, we focus on how to integrate goals of use and goals of understanding within learning environment research. We do this in taking existing methodologies as our starting point. The central questions are: What methodologies do we have to examine complex phenomena within learning environments? How can the field meet the dual challenge of contributing to theory and practice? And to what extent and in what ways do existing methodologies reflect principles of scientific research? In pursuing these questions, we outline the principles of scientific research proposed by the National Research Council (2001). Then we apply these principles in an analysis of two prototypical methodologies that respond to the challenge of examining complex phenomena related to learning environments in situated practice. These methodologies are design research and the integrative research paradigm. These methodologies converge along some lines while differ on others. The focus of our comparative analysis is to articulate the underlying assumptions of these methodologies, to reconsider currently depicted dichotomies, and to develop a common language of principles for use-inspired basic research. As conclusions, three tasks are defined for future research practice: (1) becoming more explicit on method in scientific contributions, (2) specifying scientific standards for the field of complex learning environment research, and (3) developing complementary practical impact standards.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bouillion, L., & Gomez, L. (2001). Collaborative design research as a window into the cultural entailments of university and school communities of practice. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2:141–178.
Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context, In S.M. Carver and D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 455–478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Edelson, D.C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (1), 105–121
Gibbons, M., Limogenes, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gomez, L. M., and Gordin, D.N. (1996). Establishing project-enhanced classrooms through design, In D. Jonassen and G. McCalla (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education, Charlottesville, VA: AACE.
Gomez, L.M., Fishman, B.J. & Pea, R.D. (1998). The CoVis project: Building a large-scale science education testbed, Interactive Learning Environments, 6 (1–2), pp. 59–92.
Greeno, J. G. & The Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5–26.
Kelly, A.E. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher (Theme Issue: The role of design in educational research) Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 3–4.
National Research Council (2001). Scientific inquiry in education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Salomon, G. (July, 1994). Not just the individual: A new conception for the future of educational psychology. Presidential address of the division of educational, instructional and school psychology presented at the International congress of applied psychology. Madrid, Spain.
Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993). (Eds.). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stark, R. & Mandl, H. (2000). Training in empirical research methods: analysis of problems and intervention from a motivational perspective. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational Psychology of Human Development (S. 165–183). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
Stark, R. & Mandl, H. (2001). Entwicklung, Implementation und Evaluation eines beispielbasierten Instruktionsansatzes zur Förderung von Handlungskompetenz im Bereich empirischer Forschungsmethoden (Research Report No. 141). München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie.
Stark, R. (1999). Lernen mit Lösungsbeispielen. Einfluss unvollständiger Lösungsbeispiele auf Beispielelaboration, Lernerfolg und Motivation. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fischer, F., Bouillion, L., Mandl, H., Gomez, L. (2003). Scientific Principles in Pasteur’s Quadrant: Integrating Goals of Understanding and Use in Learning Environment Research. In: Wasson, B., Ludvigsen, S., Hoppe, U. (eds) Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_59
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_59
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6321-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0195-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive