Abstract
The work described in this paper deals with conceptual understanding of design products. A working hypothesis is that the comprehension of something by someone is strongly related to the capability of the subject to build and use multiple representations of the thing under consideration and to explicitly consider their characteristics and their reciprocal dependencies in explanation and problem solving. A cognitive tool called MMforTED has been developed to foster the acquisition of several conceptualisations (ontologies) that can be used to represent and inquiry about artefacts from different perspectives. The system exploits an instructional environment implemented by an electronic hypertext, that enables users to browse through a network of models of several devices. Browsing through the network of models is accompanied by a simultaneous change of perspective. Because of the particular organisation of domain knowledge we have adopted, this amounts to exercising a well defined knowledge transmutation (e.g. conceptual abstraction, generalisation, reduction, approximation and aggregation or their inverses). The ability to explore a situation from different conceptual perspectives is considered fundamental for problem setting and design development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andriessen, J and Sandberg, J: 1999, Where is education heading and how about Al?, IJAIED 10: 130–150.
Ball, N, Matthews, P and Wallace, K: 1998, Managing conceptual design objects, in JS Gero and F Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘88, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 67–86.
Chittaro, L, Guida, G, Tasso, C and Toppano, E: 1993, Functional and teleological knowledge in the multimodelling approach for reasoning about physical systems: a case study in diagnosis, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23 (6): 1718–1751.
Chittaro,L, Tasso, C and Toppano, E: 1994, Putting functional knowledge on firmer ground, Applied Artificial Intelligence 8 (2): 239–258.
Coyne, RD, Rosenman, MA, Radford, AD, Balachandran, M and Gero, JS: 1990, Knowledge-Based Design Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Falkenberg, ED, et al: 1998, FRISCO - A Framework of Information System Concepts - The FRISCO Report IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO, Web version: ftp://ftp.leidenuniv.nl/pub/rul/fri-full.zip.
Fujii, H and Gero, JS: 2000, A situated design agent to assist in the explanation of situatedness in designing, Poster Abstract, Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘00, pp. 18–20.
Gadamer, H: 1976, Philosophical Hermeneutics, University of California Press, Berkley, CA.
Gilbert, JE, Hubscher, R and Puntambekar S (eds): 2001, AIED 2001 Workshop Papers: Assessment Methods in Web-Based Learning Environments and Adaptive Hypermedia, San Antonio, Texas.
Gruber, TR: 1993, A translation approach to portable ontology specification, Knowledge Acquisition 5 (2): 199–220.
Haymaker, J, Ackermann, E and Fischer, M: 2000, Meaning mediating mechanism, in JS Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘00, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 691–715.
Heylighen, A and Verstijnen, IM: 2000, Exposure to examples, in JS Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘00, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 413–432.
Hieb, MR and Michalski, RS: 1993, Multitype inference in multistrategy task-adaptive learning: dynamic Interlaced Hierarchies, in RS Michalski and G Tecuci (eds), Proceedings of the 2“ d International Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, pp. 3–17.
lacucci, C and Pain, H: 2001, Making sense of open representations through a constructive hypertext: how to evaluate learning?, in JE Gilbert, R Hubscher and S Puntambekar (eds), AIED-2001 Workshop Papers: Assessment Methods in Web-Based Learning Environment and Adaptive Hypermedia, pp. 14–20.
Laurillard, D: 1993, Rethinking University Teaching, Routledge, London.
Mackellar BK and Peckham, J: 1998, Multiple perspectives of design objects, in JS Gero and F Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘88, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 87–106.
Marijomaa, E: 1997, Aspects of relevance in information modelling. methodological principles and conceptual problems, Filosofisia Tutkimuksia Tampereen Yliopistosta 63.
MQandD Group: 1995, Qualitative reasoning: a survey of techniques and applications, AICOM 8 (3/4): 3–17.
Noy, NF and Hafner, CD: 1997, The state of the art in ontology design: a survey and comparative review, AI Magazine 18 (3): 53–74.
Ohlsson, S: 1993, Learning to do and learning to understand: a lesson and a challenge for cognitive modelling, in P Reimann and H Spada (eds), Learning in Humans and Machines, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 37–62.
Penussel, L, Chanel, RI and Rothenburger, B: 1997, A formalism for inter-perspective relationships checking, in H Kangassalo, JF Nilsson, H Jaakkola and S Ohsuga (eds), Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases VIII, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 1–10.
Protzen, J, Harris, D and Cavallin, H: 2000, Limited computation, unlimited design, in JS Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘00, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 43–52.
Rosenman, MA and Gero, JS: 1996, Modelling multiple views of design objects in a collaborative CAD environment, INCIT’96 Proceedings, pp. 49–61.
Sim, SK and Duffy, AHB: 1998, A foundation for machine learning in design, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 12: 193–209.
Simoff, Si and Maher, ML: 1998, Designing with the activity/space ontology, in JS Gero and F Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘88, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 23–43.
Spiro, R: 1997, Knowledge acquisition for application-cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains, in BK Britton and SM Glynn (eds), Executive Control Processes in Reading, Erlbaum Assoc, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 177–199.
Toppano, E: 1999, Using graph transformations to support multilevel reasoning in engineering design, Machine Graphics and Vision 8 (3): 395–425.
Toppano, E.: 1997, Multistrategy modelling: a case study in design, in H Kangassalo, JF Nilsson, H Jaakkola and S Ohsuga (eds), Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases ViII, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 31–46.
Toppano, E: 1996, Rational model selection in large engineering knowledge bases, Applied Artificial Intelligence 10 (3): 191–224.
Uschold, M: 1998, Knowledge level modelling: concepts and terminology, The Knowledge Engineering Review 13: 5–29.
van Joolingen, W: 1999, Cognitive tools for discovery learning, IJAIED 10: 385–397.
Varejao, FM, Garcia, AC. et al.: 2000, Towards an ontological framework for knowledgebased design systems, in JS Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘00, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 55–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toppano, E. (2002). MMforTED: A Cognitive Tool Fostering the Acquisition of Conceptual Knowledge about Design Products. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6059-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0795-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive