Skip to main content

From Concept to Embodiment: Challenge and Strategy

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02

Abstract

Facing with the difficulty in information propagation and synthesizing from conceptual to embodiment design, this paper introduces a function-oriented, axiom based conceptual modeling scheme. Default logic reasoning is exploited for recognition and reconstitution of conceptual product geometric and topological information. The proposed product modeling system and reasoning approach testify a methodology of “structural variation design”, which is verified in the implementation of a GPAL (Green Product All Life-cycle) CAD system. The GPAL system includes major enhancement modules of a mechanism layout sketching method based on fuzzy logic, a knowledge-based function-to-form mapping mechanism and conceptual form reconstitution paradigm based on default geometric reasoning. A mechanical hand design example shows a more than 20 times increase in design efficacy with these enhancement modules in the GPAL system on a general 3D CAD platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldefeld, B: 1988, Variation of geometry based on a geometric-reasoning method, Computer Aided Design 20(3): 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hakim, L, Kusiak, A and Mathew, J: 2000, A graph-theoretic approach to conceptual design with functional perspectives, Computer Aided Design 32 (14): 867–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, W, Fudos, I, Hoffman, C, Cai, J and Paige, R: 1995, Geometric constraint solver’, Computer-Aided Design 27: 487–501

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, G and Golob, B: 2000, A feature-based approach towards an integrated product model including conceptual design information, Computer Aided Design 32(14): 877887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y-M, Britton, GA and Tor, SB: 2000, Constraint-based functional design verification for conceptual design, Computer Aided Design 32 (14): 889–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driling, P, et al: 1996, A unified approach to free-form and regular feature modeling, Annals of the CIRP 45 (1): 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, CX: 2001, Fuzzy mapping of requirements onto functions in detail design, Computer Aided Design 33 (6): 425–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S and Dixon, JR: 1989, A review of research in mechanical engineering design, Part 1: descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based model, model of design process, Research in Engineering Design 1: 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harutunian, V, et al: 1996, Decision making and software tools for product development based on axiomatic design theory, Annals of the CIRP 45 (1): 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablokow, AG, Vicker Jr, JJ, and Turcic, DA: 1996, Topological and geometric consistency in boundary representations of solid models of mechanical component, Journal of Mechanical Design 115: 762–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, FL: 1995, Conceptual modeling for industrial design, Annals of CIRP 44(1): 123128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamure, H and Michelucci, D: 1996, Solving geometric constraints by homotopy, IEEE Transaction on Visualization and Computer Graphics 2: 22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K and Gossard, DC: 1985, A hierarchical data structure for representing assemblies: Part1, Computer Aided Design 17 (1): 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, JY: 1996, Geometric reasoning for knowledge-based parametric design using graph representation, Computer-Aided Design 28: 831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, R and Gossard, D: 1982, Modification of geometric models through variational geometry, Computer Aided Design 14 (4): 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, H and Shpitalni, M: 1995, A new interface for conceptual design based on object reconstruction from a single free hand sketch, Annals of the CIRP 44 (1): 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, KJ, Duffy, A and Green, S: 1993, An intelligent concept assistant, in H Yoshikawa and EA Warman (eds), Design Theory for CAD,North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L: 1984, The logic of design, in N Cross (ed.), Developments In Design Methodology, John Wily, London, pp. 265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, H: 1993, Topological operators and Boolean operations for complex-BASED non-manifold geometric models, Computer Aided Design 25 (2): 119–129.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, A, de Pennington, A and Baxter, J: 2001, Requirements management: a representation scheme for product specifications, Computer Aided Design 33 (7): 511–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, JC: 1991, Algebraic solution for geometry from dimensional constraints, (eds) ACM Symposium Foundations of Solid Modeling, ACM SIGGRAPH, Austin, Texas, pp. 397407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qamhiyah, AZ, Venter, RD, et al: 1996, Geometric reasoning for the extraction of form features, Computer Aided Design 28 (11): 887–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, SF, Wright, DK and Jordanov, IN: 2000, From on-line sketching to 2D and 3D geometry: a system based on fuzzy knowledge, Computer Aided Design 32 (14): 851–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R: 1980, A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13: 81–132.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, U, Pramanik, N, Sudarsan, R, Sriram RD and Lyons KW: 2001, Function-to-form mapping: model, representation and applications in design synthesis, Computer Aided Design 33 (10): 699–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, M, et al.1993, Function features for design in mechanical engineering, Computer in Industry 23: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Screenivasa, R, et al: 1996, From symbol to form: a frame work for conceptual design, Computer Aided Design 28 (11): 853–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, D: 1991, Automatic dimensioning in design for manufacturing, Proceedings of Solid Modeling Foundations and CAD/CAM Applications ACM SIGGRAPH, Austin, Texas, pp. 371–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, S and Numao, M: 1996, Constraint-based design for 3D shapes, Artificial Intelligence 76: 194–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shum, SSP, Lau, WS, Yuen, MMF and Yu, KM: 2001, Solid reconstruction from orthographic views using 2-stage extrusion, Computer Aided Design 33 (1): 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, R and Turner, JU: 1994, Relative positioning of variation part models for design analysis, Computer Aided Design 26 (5): 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, NP: 1990, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, MX: 1995, Development of an integrated Al system for conceptual design support, in J Sharpe (ed.), Al System Support for Conceptual Design, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toimiyama, T, Umeda, Y and Yoshikawa, H: 1993, A CAD for functional design, Annals Of The CIRP 42 (1): 143–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaco, D and Kim, YS: 1994, Geometric reasoning for machining features using convex decomposition, Computer Aided Design 26 (6): 477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, ZG and Huang, KZ: 1999, Product net work model supporting conceptual design, Chinese Journal of Engineering Graphics 2: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, ZG, et al.: 1999, Green product design automation based on the theory of generalized mapping, Proceedings of Second International Conference on LAID&CD’99, International Academic Publishers, Bangkok, pp. 310–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, ZG, Frazer JH and Tang, MX: 2001, Development of product-oriented user-centered design tool, in P Yunhe, et al (eds), Fourth International Conference On Computer Aided Industrial Design And Conceptual Design, International Academic Publishers, Jinan, pp 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, H: 1989, Design philosophy: the state of the art, Annals Of The CIRP 38(2): 579–586

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xu, Z.G., Tang, M.X., Frazer, J.H. (2002). From Concept to Embodiment: Challenge and Strategy. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0795-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics