Skip to main content

Connectivity as a Key to Supporting Design

A state-action approach to planning

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02

Abstract

In the past, support for design has largely concentrated on specific design problems. The great challenge for many designers and design managers working on complex problems is to understand the connections between different aspects of design represented by different types of design models. Designs comprise connected components, and processes comprise linked tasks, but tasks are also connected to components. Each design project is embedded in the context of other projects. This paper discusses an on-going research project into design process improvement, which is centred on the use of process models and product models, designed to show important aspects of connectivity. These models are inevitably provisional due to the uncertain nature of design. The process model describes tasks and their linking parameters; the product model incorporates a probabilistic measure of the risk of change to one component spreading to others in terms of likelihood and impact. Planning and scheduling activities before the project begins can support the allocation of resources and indicate critical points in the process. Change prediction can aid change planning and decision making about possible design moves. Explicit models of connectivity enable designers to question each other’s assumptions and aid communication in design teams. However, the challenge lies in building sufficiently accurate models cost effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin, S, Baldwin, A, Li, B and Waskett, P: 1999, Analytical design planning technique: a model of the detailed building design process, Design Studies 20(3): 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichlmaier, C: 2000, Methoden zur flexiblen Gestaltung von integrierten Entwicklungsprozessen, Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, TR: in press, applying the design structure matrix system to decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blessing, LTM: 1994, A Process-Based Approach to Computer Supported Engineering Design, PhD thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccarelli, LL: 1994, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A and Bligh, TP: 1994, An approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanical conceptual design. Part 1: Introduction and Knowledge Representation, Research in Engineering Design 6: 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A and Bligh, TP: 1996, An approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanical conceptual design. Part II: Kind Synthesis, Research in Engineering Design 8: 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, SC: 2002, A model for user interaction in grammar-based design systems, Automation in Construction 11(2): 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, PJ, Simons, C and Eckert, C: 2001, Predicting change propagation in complex design, Proceedings of the ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 13th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, PJ, Melo, AF and Connor, A: 2000, Signposting for design process improvement, in JS Gero (ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design’00, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 333–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, PJ and Hamilton, JR: 2000, Signposting: a parameter-driven task-based model of the design process, Research in Engineering Design 12: 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N: 1989, Engineering Design Methods, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym, CL: 1994 Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, CM: 2001, The communication bottleneck in knitwear design: analysis and computing solutions, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10: 29–74.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, CM, Clarkson, PJ and Stacey, MK: 2001, Information flow in engineering companies: Problems and their causes, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Management — Process and Information Issues, Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, CM and Stacey, MK: 2001, Dimensions of communication in design, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Management — Process and Information Issues, Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, CM, Kelly, I and Stacey, MK: 1999, Interactive generative systems for conceptual design: an empirical perspective, AIEDAM 13 (4): 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, CM, Zanker, W and Clarkson, PI: 2001, Aspects of a better understanding of changes, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Applications in Industry and Education, Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlenspiel, K: 1995, Integrierte Produktenwicklung, Carl Hauser Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, SD, Whitney, DE, Smith, RP and Gebala, DA: 1994, A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development, Research in Engineering Design 6: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppinger, SD and Salminen, VK: 2001, Patterns of product development interactions, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Research — Theories, Methodologies and Product Modelling Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Frizelle, G and Woodcock, E: 1995, Measuring complexity as an aid to developing operational strategy, International Journal of Operations and Production Management 15 (5): 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, S, Eynard, B and Magnon, L. 2001, A multi-site design experience using a computer supported collaborative work tool, Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Applications in Industry and Education, Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 379–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, M with Slater, C: 1995, SSADM Version 4: A Practical Approach, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K: 1999, On Line and on Paper, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, JP and Clarkson, PJ. 2001, Improving the product by accelerating the process, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Research — Theories, Methodologies and Product Modelling Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J: 1995, The multidimensional networks of complex systems, in J Casti, R Thord and D.Batten (eds), Networks in Action, Springer, Berlin, pp. 49–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, L: 1976, The logic of design and the question of value, in L March (ed.), Architecture of Form, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo, AF and Clarkson, PJ: 2001, Design process planning using a state-action model, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Management — Process and Information Issues, Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minneman, SL: 1991, The Social Construction of a Technical Reality: Empirical Studies of Group Engineering Design Practice, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, K: 2001, A process for modularizing product families, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Engineering Design: Design Methods for Performance and Sustainability, Professional Engineering Publishers, Glasgow, pp. 523–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G and Beitz, W: 1996, Engineering Design, 2nd ed., translated by K.M. Wallace, L.T.M. Blessing and F. Bauert, Springer, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman, M: 1996, The generation of form using an evolutionary approach, in JS Gero and F Sudweeks (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Design’96, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 643–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, ATh, Wielinga, BJ and Breuker, JA: 1993, KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development, Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, ATh, Akkermans, H, Anjewierden, A,de Hoog, R, Shadbolt, N, van der Velde,, and Wielinga, R: 1999, Knowledge Engineering and Management, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, K and Cagan, J: 1999, The design of novel roof trusses with shape annealing: assessing the ability of a computational method in aiding structural designers with varying design intent, Design Studies 20: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigley, JE and Mischke, CR: 1989, Mechanical Engineering Design, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivaloganathan, S and Shahin, TMM (eds.): 1998, Design Reuse, Professional Engineering Publishing, Edmonds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H: 1996, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, MK, Clarkson, PJ and Eckert, CM: 2000, Signposting: an AI approach to supporting human decision making in design, Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences: 20th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, MK and Eckert, CM: in press, Against ambiguityComputer Supported Cooperative Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiny, G: 1980 Introduction to shape and shape grammars, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 7: 343–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward, DV: 1981. The design structure matrix: a method for managing the design of complex systems, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM-28(3): 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, NP: 1990, Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, NP: 1999, A theory of complexity, periodicity and the design axioms, Research in Engineering Design 11: 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, DSF and Hayball, CC: 1993, Knowledge-Based Systems Analysis and Design, Prentice Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G: 2000, Cabin and system knowledge tools, Proceedings of Knowledge-Based Organizations 2000, http://www.kboworld.com/kboeurope2000.html.

  • Tribus, M: 1969, Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs, Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wielinga, BJ, Schreiber, ATh and Breuker, JA: 1992: KADS: A modelling approach to knowledge engineering, Knowledge Acquisition 4: 5–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eckert, C., Clarkson, P.J. (2002). Connectivity as a Key to Supporting Design. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0795-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics