Skip to main content

Applicability of Self-Organizing Maps in Content-Based Image Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing

Abstract

Image databases are getting larger and diverse with the coming up of new imaging devices and advancements in technology. Content-based image classification (CBIC) is a method to classify images from large databases into different categories, on the basis of image content. An efficient image representation is an important component of a CBIC system. In this paper, we demonstrate that Self-Organizing Maps (SOM)-based clustering can be used to form an efficient representation of an image for a CBIC system. The proposed method first extracts Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) features from images. Then it uses SOM for clustering of descriptors and forming a Bag of Features (BOF) or Vector of Locally Aggregated Descriptors (VLAD) representation of image. The performance of proposed method has been compared with systems using k-means clustering for forming VLAD or BOF representations of an image. The classification performance of proposed method is found to be better in terms of F-measure (FM) value and execution time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. W. Smeulders, M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. “Content-Based Image Retrieval at the End of the Early Years.” IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 22(12), pp. 1349–1380, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.P. Singh and R.D. Garg. “Classification of high resolution satellite image using spatial constraints based fuzzy clustering.” Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 8(1), pp. 083526 (1–16), 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.P. Singh and R.D. Garg. “Land Use And Land Cover Classification Using Satellite Imagery: A Hybrid Classifier And Neural Network Approach.” Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Modeling, Optimization and Computing, pp. 753–762, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Lowe. “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant key points.” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60(2), pp. 91–110, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Sivic and A. Zisserman. “Video google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos.” Proceedings of 9th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, pp. 1470–1477, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Csurka, C. Bray, C. Dance, and L. Fan. “Visual categorization with bags of keypoints.” Workshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–22, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. J´egou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. “Packing bag-of features.” Proceedings of 12th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2357 – 2364, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. J´egou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. “Improving bag-of features for large scale image search.” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 87, pp. 316–336, February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Fei-Fei, R. Fergus and P. Perona. “Learning generative visual models from few training examples: an incremental Bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories.” IEEE, CVPR 2004, Workshop on Generative-Model Based Vision, pp. 178–178, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. Chum, J. Philbin, M. Isard, and A. Zisserman. “Scalable near identical image and shot detection.” Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, pp. 549–556, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Chum, J. Philbin, and A. Zisserman. “Near duplicate image detection: min-Hash and tf-idf weighting.” Proceedings of 19th British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 50.1–50.10, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xin Chen, Xiaohua Hu and Xiajiong Shen. “Spatial Weighting for Bag-of-Visual-Words Representation and Its Application in Content-Based Image Retrieval.” Proceedings of the 13th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD’09), pp. 867–874, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. “Lost in quantization: Improving particular object retrieval in large scale image databases.” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Chum, A. Mikulik, M. Perdoch, and J. Matas. “Total recall II: Query expansion revisited.” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 889 – 896, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Arandjelovi ́c and A. Zisserman. “Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval.” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2911 – 2918, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Perronnin and C. R. Dance. “Fisher kernels on visual vocabularies for image categorization.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Jegou, M. Douze, C. Schmid, and P. Perez. “Aggregating local descriptors into a compact image representation.” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3304 – 3311, June 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Jegou, F. Perronnin, M. Douze, J. Sanchez, P. Perez, and C. Schmid. “Aggregating local image descriptors into compact codes.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 1704 – 1716, September 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Arandjelovi ́c and A. Zisserman. “All about VLAD.” Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1578–1585, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Teuvo Kohonen. “Self-Organizing Maps.” Springer Series in Information Sciences, vol. 30, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T.K. Kohonen. “Essentials of the Self-Organizing Map.” Neural Networks, vol. 37, pp. 52–65, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Piotr Plonski and Krzysztof Zaremba. “Improving Performance of Self-Organising Maps with Distance Metric Learning Method.” Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, vol. 7267, pp. 169–177, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. E. C. Vargas, R. Francelin Romero and K. Obermayer. “Speeding up algorithms for SOM family for large and high dimensional databases.” Proceedings of the Workshop on Self Organizing Maps, pp. 167–172, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T. Kohonen. “Comparison of SOM Point Densities Based on Different Criteria.” Neural Computation, vol. 11, pp. 2081–2095, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumar Rohit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rohit, K., Sai Subrahmanyam Gorthi, R.K., Mishra, D. (2017). Applicability of Self-Organizing Maps in Content-Based Image Classification. In: Raman, B., Kumar, S., Roy, P., Sen, D. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Image Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 459. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2104-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2104-6_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2103-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2104-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics