Skip to main content

A Comparison of Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm Based on Multi-objective Approach for Optimal Composite Nonlinear Feedback Control of Vehicle Stability System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theory, Methodology, Tools and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems (AsiaSim 2016, SCS AutumnSim 2016)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 643))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1764 Accesses

Abstract

This paper proposes an intelligent tuning methods of linear and nonlinear parameters for composite nonlinear feedback (CNF) control using multi objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA). The main advantage of the methods lies in its efficient fitness/objective evaluation approach of the algorithms such that it can be computed rapidly to obtain an optimal CNF with good system response. In order to yield an efficient technique for fitness evaluation, it is achieved by utilizing a multi objective approach, thus avoiding the use of single objective approach to evaluate the fitness. MATLAB simulations are used to test the effectiveness of the proposed techniques. Nonlinear vehicle model is constructed to validate the controller performance. The model is also simplified to a linear model for designing the CNF. The superiority of the proposed methods over the manual tuning method are improved with 98 percent reduction in error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lin, Z., Pachter, M., Banda, S.: Toward improvement of tracking performance nonlinear feedback for linear systems. Int. J. Control 70, 1–11 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma, D., Cao, Y., Fan, D.: Design and implementation of an electro-optical tracking servo system via composite nonlinear control approach. In: Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), pp. 1139–1142 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, B.M., Weiyao, L.: On improving transient performance in tracking control for a class of nonlinear discrete-time systems with input saturation. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 52, 1307–1313 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Yingjie, H., Chen, B.M., Chao, W.: Composite nonlinear control with state and measurement feedback for general multivariable systems with input saturation. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4469–4474 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, B.M., Lee, T.H., Kemao, P., Venkataramanan, V.: Composite nonlinear feedback control for linear systems with input saturation: theory and an application. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 48, 427–439 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiyao, L., Thum, C.K., Chen, B.M.: A hard-disk-drive servo system design using composite nonlinear-feedback control with optimal nonlinear gain tuning methods. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. 57, 1735–1745 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiencke, U., Nielsen, L.: Automotive Control Systems for Engine, Driveline and Vehicle. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baṣlamiṣli, S.Ç., Köse, İ.E., Anlaç, G.: Handling stability improvement through robust active front steering and active differential control. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 49, 657–683 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pacejka, H.B.: Tyre and Vehicle Dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jazar, R.N.: Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application. Springer, New York (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramli, L., Sam, Y.M., Mohamed, Z., Khairi Aripin, M., Fahezal Ismail, M.: Composite nonlinear feedback control with multi-objective particle swarm optimization for active front steering system. Jurnal Teknologi 72, 13–20 (2015). Scopus

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirzaei, M.: A new strategy for minimum usage of external yaw moment in vehicle dynamic control system. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 18, 213–224 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiyao, L., Chen, B.M.: On selection of nonlinear gain in composite nonlinear feedback control for a class of linear systems. In: IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 1198–1203 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ismail, F.S.: Self organizing genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. He, J.: Integrated vehicle dynamics control using active steering, driveline and braking. University of Leeds (United Kingdom), Ann Arbor (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liyana Ramli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ramli, L., Sam, Y.M., Mohamed, Z. (2016). A Comparison of Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm Based on Multi-objective Approach for Optimal Composite Nonlinear Feedback Control of Vehicle Stability System. In: Zhang, L., Song, X., Wu, Y. (eds) Theory, Methodology, Tools and Applications for Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems. AsiaSim SCS AutumnSim 2016 2016. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 643. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2663-8_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2663-8_67

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-2662-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-2663-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics