Skip to main content

An Experimental Perspective for Computation-Efficient Neural Networks Training

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Computer Architecture (ACA 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 908))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays, as the tremendous requirements of computation-efficient neural networks to deploy deep learning models on inexpensive and broadly-used devices, many lightweight networks have been presented, such as MobileNet series, ShuffleNet, etc. The computation-efficient models are specifically designed for very limited computational budget, e.g., 10–150 MFLOPs, and can run efficiently on ARM-based devices. These models have smaller CMR than the large networks, such as VGG, ResNet, Inception, etc.

However, it is quite efficient for inference on ARM, how about inference or training on GPU? Unfortunately, compact models usually cannot make full utilization of GPU, though it is fast for its small size. In this paper, we will present a series of extensive experiments on the training of compact models, including training on single host, with GPU and CPU, and distributed environment. Then we give some analysis and suggestions on the training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is Chipset Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821, CPU Quad-core (4\(\,\times \,\)2.15/2.16 GHz Kryo).

  2. 2.

    Unlike the original papers, the computational complexity and the memory accesses also include the pooling, lateral and activation layers.

References

  1. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., et al.: Going deeper with convolutions, pp. 1–9 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., et al.: Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. AAAI, vol. 4, p. 12 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chollet, F.: Xception: deep learning with depth wise separable convolutions. arXiv preprint (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., et al.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Weinberger, K.Q., et al.: Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 3 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, J., Rathod, V., Sun, C., et al.: Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors. In: IEEE CVPR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A.: Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Computer Science (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton, G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105. Curran Associates Inc. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., et al.: Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 580–587. IEEE Computer Society (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R.: Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39(6), 1137–1149 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Long, J., Shelhamer, E., Darrell, T.: Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3431–3440. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard, A.G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., et al.: MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 (2017)

  13. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., et al.: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks: mobile networks for classification, detection and segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.04381 (2018)

  14. Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Lin, M., et al.: ShuffleNet: an extremely efficient convolutional neural network for mobile devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01083 (2017)

  15. Qin, Z., Zhang, Z., Chen, X., et al.: FD-MobileNet: improved MobileNet with a fast down sampling strategy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03750 (2018)

  16. Russakovsky, O., et al.: Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 115(3), 211–252 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Goyal, P., Dollár, P., Girshick, R., et al.: Accurate, large minibatch SGD: training ImageNet in 1 hour. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677 (2017)

  18. You, Y., Zhang, Z., Hsieh, C.J., et al.: 100-epoch ImageNet training with AlexNet in 24 minutes. ArXiv e-prints (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gysel, P., Motamedi, M., Ghiasi, S.: Hardware-oriented approximation of convolutional neural networks (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mathew, M., Desappan, K., Swami, P.K., et al.: Sparse, quantized, full frame CNN for low power embedded devices. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 328–336. IEEE Computer Society (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, M.: Scaling distributed machine learning with the parameter server, p. 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, T., Li, M., Li, Y., et al.: MXNet: a flexible and efficient machine learning library for heterogeneous distributed systems. Statistics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. InfiniBand Trade Association: InfiniBand Architecture Specification: Release 1.0 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Padovano, M.: System and method for accessing a storage area network as network attached storage: WO, US6606690[P] (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kågström, B., Ling, P., van Loan, C.: GEMM-based level 3 BLAS: high-performance model implementations and performance evaluation benchmark. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. (TOMS) 24(3), 268–302 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Williams, S., Patterson, D., Oliker, L., et al.: The roofline model: a pedagogical tool for auto-tuning kernels on multicore architectures. In: Hot Chips, vol. 20, pp. 24–26 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sifre, L.: Rigid-motion scattering for image classification. Ph.D. thesis (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaoning Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yin, L., Chen, X., Qin, Z., Zhang, Z., Feng, J., Li, D. (2018). An Experimental Perspective for Computation-Efficient Neural Networks Training. In: Li, C., Wu, J. (eds) Advanced Computer Architecture. ACA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 908. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2423-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2423-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-2422-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-2423-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics