Skip to main content

Soil Property Surface Modeling Based on Ensemble Learning for Complex Landforms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 980))

Abstract

It is difficult to simulate soil property with a single global interpolation model. For the characteristics of spatial discontinuity, limited precision of global interpolation model and poor adaptability, a high accuracy surface modeling for soil property based on ensemble learning and fusion geographical environment variables was proposed (HASMSP-EL). The simulation accuracy of different interpolation methods was evaluated by using Mean Error (ME), Mean Relative Error (MRE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Accuracy (AC). The results showed that: (1) In the interpolation method of fusion geographical environment variables, the estimation deviation of HASMSP-EL was lower. Compared with other interpolation methods, ME, MRE, RMSE and AC of HASMSP-EL were better. HASMSP-EL had more advantages in describing spatial variation and local detail information of soil potassium content, and its accuracy was 6.42%, 7.28%, 11.56% and 9.38% higher than that of Regression Kriging (RK), Bayesian Kriging (BK), Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Ordinary Kriging (OK), respectively. (2) The HASMSP-EL can provide more details in the geographical boundary, which made the simulation results consistent with the real auxiliary variables. HASMSP-EL not only considered the nonlinear relationship between geographical environmental variables and soil property, but also combined the adaptive advantages of multiple models. It is a new method to simulate soil property in complex geomorphological regions with higher precision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li, J., Heap, A.D., Potter, A., Daniell, J.J.: Application of machine learning methods to spatial interpolation of environmental variables. Environ. Model. Softw. 26, 1647–1659 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao, Q.G.: Strategic thinking of soil science in China. Soils 41, 681–688 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yi, X.S., Li, G.S., Yin, Y.Y., Peng, J.T.: Comparison on soil depth prediction among different spatial interpolation methods: a case study in the three-river headwaters region of Qinghai Province. Geogr. Res. 31, 1793–1805 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, J.F., Ge, Y., Li, L.F., Meng, B., Wu, J.L., Bai, Y.C.: Spatiotemporal data analysis in geography. Acta Geogr. Sin. 69, 1326–1345 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yue, T.X., Wang, S.H.: Adjustment computation of HASM: a high-accuracy and high-speed method. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 24, 1725–1743 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi, W., Liu, J., Du, Z., Yue, T.: Development of a surface modeling method for mapping soil properties. J. Geogr. Sci. 22, 752–760 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, C., Wu, J., Luo, Y., Zhang, L., DeGloria, S.D.: Spatial estimation of soil total nitrogen using cokriging with predicted soil organic matter content. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 73, 1676–1681 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bashir, B., Fouli, H.: Studying the spatial distribution of maximum monthly rainfall in selected regions of Saudi Arabia using geographic information systems. Arab. J. Geosci. 8, 1–15 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kravchenko, A.: Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67, 1564–1571 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Q., Dehler, S.A.: Inverse spatial principal component analysis for geophysical survey data interpolation. J. Appl. Geophys. 115, 79–91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Panagopoulos, T., Jesus, J., Antunes, M., Beltrao, J.: Analysis of spatial interpolation for optimising management of a salinized field cultivated with lettuce. Eur. J. Agron. 24, 1–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gotway, C.A., Ferguson, R.B., Hergert, G.W., Peterson, T.A.: Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 1237–1247 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Montealegre, A., Lamelas, M., Riva, J.: Interpolation routines assessment in ALS-derived digital elevation models for forestry applications. Remote Sens. 7, 8631–8654 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xie, Y.F., Chen, T.B., Lei, M., Zheng, G.D., Song, B., Li, X.Y.: Impact of spatial interpolation methods on the estimation of regional soil cd. Acta Sci. Circum. 30, 847–854 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Triantafilis, J., Odeh, I., McBratney, A.: Five geostatistical models to predict soil salinity from electromagnetic induction data across irrigated cotton. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 65, 869–878 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, W., Zhang, H.R., Yan, D.P., Wang, S.L.: Adaptive surface modeling of soil properties in complex landforms. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 6, 178 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, H., Lu, L., Liu, Y., Liu, W.: Spatial sampling strategies for the effect of interpolation accuracy. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 4, 2742–2768 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, W., Du, P.J., Wang, D.C.: Ensemble learning for spatial interpolation of soil potassium content based on environmental information. Plos One 10, e0124383 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi, W.J., Liu, J.Y., Du, Z.P., Yue, T.X.: High accuracy surface modeling of soil properties based on geographic information. Acta Geogr. Sin. 66, 1574–1581 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Collins, F.C., Bolstad, P.V.: A comparison of spatial interpolation techniques in temperature estimation (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Asli, M., Marcotte, D.: Comparison of approaches to spatial estimation in a bivariate context. Math. Geol. 27, 641–658 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Odeh, I.O., McBratney, A., Chittleborough, D.: Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regression-kriging. Geoderma 67, 215–226 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41601405). We are grateful to the Qinghai Environmental Monitoring Center for providing topsoil sampling approval. Thanks to the China Soil Investigation Office and the Bureau of Geological Exploration & Development of Qinghai Province for providing secondary datasets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, W., Liu, Y., Yang, M., Xie, M. (2019). Soil Property Surface Modeling Based on Ensemble Learning for Complex Landforms. In: Xie, Y., Zhang, A., Liu, H., Feng, L. (eds) Geo-informatics in Sustainable Ecosystem and Society. GSES 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 980. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7025-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7025-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7024-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7025-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics