Skip to main content

The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces 2.0

Three Experiments in Computational Urban Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer-Aided Architectural Design. "Hello, Culture" (CAAD Futures 2019)

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel framework for urban analysis that leverages computational techniques, along with established urban research methods, to study how people use urban public space. Through three case studies in different urban locations in Europe and the US, it demonstrates how recent machine learning and computer vision techniques may assist us in producing unprecedently detailed portraits of the relative influence of urban and environmental variables on people’s use of public space. The paper further discusses the potential of this framework to enable empirically-enriched forms of urban and social analysis with applications in urban planning, design, research, and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arnheim, R.: Art and Visual Perception. University of California Press, Berkeley (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babbie, E.R.: The Practice of Social Research. Wadsworth Cengage, Belmont (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Derix, C.: The Space of People in Computation. Archit. Des. 84, 14–23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., Bedford, M.: Space syntax. Environ. Plan. B 3, 147–185 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Janofske, E.: Architektur-Räume: Idee und Gestalt bei Hans Scharoun (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, X., Hijazi, I., Koenig, R., et al.: Assessing essential qualities of urban space with emotional and visual data based on gis technique. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 5, 218 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi5110218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parker, S.P. (ed.): McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. McGraw-Hill, New York City (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B.: La représentation de l’espace chez l’enfant. [Representation of space by the child.]. Presses Universitaires de France, 75006 Paris, France (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Whyte, W.H.: The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Municipal Art Society of New York, USA (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs, J.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books – Random House, New York (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McMahon Catherine in Dutta, A., Tuerk, S., Kubo, M., et al.: A Second Modernism: MIT, Architecture, and the “Techno-Cultural” Moment. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bettencourt, L.M.A.: The Kind of Problem a City is. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe NM, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adler, J.: Life in the City is Essentially One Giant Math Problem. Smithsonian mag. (http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/life-in-the-city-is-essentially-one-giant-math-problem-37759041/) (2013)

  14. Sisson, P.: Your City is Watching You. Curbed (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearson, K.: Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. 58, 240–242 (1895)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of association between two thing. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72 (1904). https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kendall, M.G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30, 81 (1938). https://doi.org/10.2307/2332226

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ratti, C.: Space syntax: some inconsistences. Environ. Plan. B: Plan. Des. 31, 487–499 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1069/b3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J.: CMU Codelab: Github repository for understanding public space use in market square. In: Github (2018). https://github.com/c0deLab/UDE_MarketSq

  20. Mattern, S.: A city is not a computer. Places J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.22269/170207

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been possible thanks to the Fulbright Foundation that supported my stay in the United States at the MS in Computational Design at CMU; to R. Delso, I. Romero and A. Gómez as partners for developing the whole computer vision algorithm; and to Metro 21 Institute for Smart Cities at CMU, Heinz Endowments, Pittsburgh Downtown Partnership and Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center for supporting the Market Square implementation in Pittsburgh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo or Daniel Cardoso Llach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J., Cardoso Llach, D. (2019). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces 2.0. In: Lee, JH. (eds) Computer-Aided Architectural Design. "Hello, Culture". CAAD Futures 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1028. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8410-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8410-3_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8409-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8410-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics