Skip to main content

Architectural Design-Based Compliance Verification for IoT-Enabled Secure Advanced Metering Infrastructure in Smart Grid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Computing and Systems for Security

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 996))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Smart Grid is built on an already existing and functioning power grid system, while adding various components to collect data as well as monitor, analyze and control the grid.  In order to ensure the proper execution of the grid functionalities, it is important to verify the compliance issues before integrating a component in the system. In this paper, we propose a two tier compliance verification model, to verify the architectural compliance for each component as well as the whole system. Besides, this model monitors the data flow between several components in the system to record new compliance rules and take actions accordingly. Thus, this model can provide a certain level of security in the system while maintaining the architectural compliance. In order to justify this model, we have used Event-B to design an example and showed that if we use this model to select primitive components, then the architectural design will comply with the main system, as well as, certain security problems are also avoided using this framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IEEE Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems. IEEE Std 1471-2000, pp. i–23 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2000.91944

  2. Abrial, J.R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering, vol. 1st. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Herold, S.: Checking architectural compliance in component-based systems. In: ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lohmann, N.: Compliance by design for artifact-centric business processes. In: 9th International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 99–115 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kharbili, M.E., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Stein, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business process compliance checking: current state and future challenges. MobIS 141, 107–113 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sackmann, S., Kahmer, M., Gilliot, M., Lowis, L.: A classification model for automating compliance. In: 10th IEEE Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the Fifth IEEE Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services, pp. 79–86 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/CECandEEE.2008.99

  7. Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z.: Compliance checking between business processes and business contracts. In: IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC’06), pp. 221–232 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghose, A.K., Koliadis, G.: Auditing business process compliance. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC-2007). Volume 4749 of Lecture Notes in Computing Science, pp. 169–180 (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y., Muller, S., Xu, A.K.: Static compliance checking framework for business process models. IBM Syst. J. 46(2), 335–361 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inf. Syst. 33(1), 64–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crnkovic, I.: Component-based software engineering—new challenges in software development. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 3, 151–161 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Darimont, R., Lamsweerde, A.V.: Formal refinement patterns for goal-driven requirements elaboration. In: Proceedings 4th ACM Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE4), San Francisco, pp. 179–190, Oct 1996

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abrial, J.R., Butler, M., Hallerstede, S., Hoang, T.S., Mehta, F., Voisin, L.: Rodin: an open toolset for modelling and reasoning in Event-B. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. (STTT) Spec. Sect. VSTTE 12(6), 447–466 (2010) (Springer, Berlin)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, and the project “ADditive Manufacturing & Industry 4.0 as innovation Driver (ADMIN 4D)”, for providing the support required for carrying out the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalini Chakraborty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chakraborty, M., Chakraborty, S., Chaki, N. (2020). Architectural Design-Based Compliance Verification for IoT-Enabled Secure Advanced Metering Infrastructure in Smart Grid. In: Chaki, R., Cortesi, A., Saeed, K., Chaki, N. (eds) Advanced Computing and Systems for Security. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 996. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8969-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics