Abstract
This study developed a occupational risk assessment indicators system of power grid enterprise, including 5 first-level indicators, a total of 24 secondary indicators. 5 first-level indicators are as the list: Dust Factors, Physical Factors, Chemical Factors, Behavior Factors and Protective Measures Factors. After two rounds of experts’ consultation, the positive coefficient of experts were 95% and 100% respectively. The authority of experts coefficient was 0.90 on average. All experts coordination coefficient of two dimensions (significance and operability) range from 0.1379 to 0.8118, which is in statistically significance (P < 0.05). It indicated that there were well performance and high coordination on the evaluation for the indicators system. Afterwards, calculating the relative weight of each secondary indicators by AHP, according to the combined weights of the secondary indicators, the sequence of the first level indicators is as follows: Behavioral Factors, Dust Factors, Chemical Factors, Protective Factors, Physical Factors; The sequence of the Dust Factors, Physical Factors, Chemical Factors Behavioral Factors, and Protective measures factor were ranked.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lu, J. etc. 2011. Research of electric power enterprise knowledge workers’ incentive based on fuzzy model. Procedia Engineering 16: 695–701.
Päivinen, M. 2006. Electricians’ perception of work-related risks in cold climate when working on high places. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 36 (7): 661–670.
Fung, I.W. etc. 2010. Developing a risk assessment model for construction safety. International Journal of Project Management 28 (6): 593–600.
Mitropoulos, P. etc. 2010. New method for measuring the safety risk of construction activities: Task demand assessment, pp. 30–38.
Hallowell, M.R., etc. 2009. Construction safety risk mitigation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135 (12): 1316–1323.
Saaty, R.W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9 (3): 161–176.
Freivalds, A. 1987. Comparison of United States (NIOSH lifting guidelines) and European (ECSC force limits) recommendations for manual work limits. The American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 48 (8): 698–702.
Padma, T. etc. 2007. Analytic hierarchy process to assess occupational risk for shoulder and neck pain. Applied Mathematics and Computation 193 (2): 321–324.
Fera, M. etc. 2009. Proposal of a quali-quantitative assessment model for the SMEs health and safety. Safety and Security Engineering 3: 117–126.
Saaty, Thomas L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (1): 9–26.
Saaty, T.L. 1972. Operations research: Some Contributions to Mathematics Applied mathematics gets a new surge of life from techniques of operations research. Science 178 (4065): 1061–1070.
Saaty, T.L. etc. 1983. Projecting average family size in rural India by the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 9 (3): 181–209.
Hodgson, D.L. etc. 2011. Increasing electrical safety by reducing the risk of arc flash hazards. In Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference (PCIC), 2011 Record of Conference Papers Industry Applications Society 58th Annual IEEE: IEEE.
Karjalainen, A. etc. 2002. Incidence of asthma among Finnish construction workers. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 44 (8): 752–757.
Byung, Y.J. 1998. Occupational deaths and injuries in the construction industry. Applied Ergonomics 29 (5): 355–360.
Lindgren, T. etc. 2000. Cabin environment and perception of cabin air quality among commercial aircrew. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 71 (8): 774–782.
Talbott, E. etc. 1985. Occupational noise exposure, noise-induced hearing loss, and the epidemiology of high blood pressure. American Journal of Epidemiology 121 (4): 501–514.
Zweers, T. etc. 1992. Health and indoor climate complaints of 7043 office workers in 61 buildings in the Netherlands. Indoor Air Journal 2 (3): 127–136.
Svedberg, U.R. etc. 2004. Emission of hexanal and carbon monoxide from storage of wood pellets, a potential occupational and domestic health hazard. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 48 (4): 339–349.
Malik, N. etc. 2010. Role of hazard control measures in occupational health and safety in the textile industry of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 47 (1): 72–76.
Salvendy, G. 2012. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. New York: Wiley.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported financially by the China Southern Power Grind (Grant No. GDKJXM20180673 and GDKJXM20185761).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, H. et al. (2020). A Framework for Occupational Risk Assessment in Power Grid Using AHP Method. In: Huang, C., Chan, YW., Yen, N. (eds) Data Processing Techniques and Applications for Cyber-Physical Systems (DPTA 2019). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1088. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1468-5_98
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1468-5_98
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1467-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1468-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)