Skip to main content

Can Reinforcement Learning Enhance Social Capital?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE 2020)

Abstract

Social capital captures the positional advantage gained by an individual by being in a social network. A well-known dichotomy defines two types of social capital: bonding capital, which refers to welfare such as trust and norms, and bridging capital, which refers to benefits in terms of influence and power. We present a framework where these notions are mathematically conceptualized. Through the framework, we discuss the process when an individual gains social capital through building new edges. We explore two questions: (1) How would an individual optimally form new relations? (2) What are the impacts of the network structure on the individual’s social capital? For these questions, we adopt a paradigm where the individual is a utility-driven agent who acquires knowledge about the network through repeated trial-and-error. In this paradigm, we propose two reinforcement learning algorithms: one guarantees the convergence to optimal values in theory, while the other is efficient in practice. We conduct experiments over both synthetic and real-world networks. Experimental results indicate that a centralized structure can enhance the performance of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In experiments, we set the restart probability \(\beta =0.15\).

  2. 2.

    All three real-world network datasets are from the public Koblenz Network Collection. http://konect.uni-koblenz.de/networks/.

References

  1. Alaa, A.M., Ahuja, K., van der Schaar, M.: A micro-foundation of social capital in evolving social networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 5(1), 14–31 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bourdieu, P.: The forms of capital. In: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brânzei, S., Larson, K.: Social distance games. In: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 3, pp. 1281–1282. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110(2), 349–399 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai, Y., Zheng, H., Liu, J., Yan, B., Su, H., Liu, Y.: Balancing the pain and gain of hobnobbing: utility-based network building over attributed social networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 193–201 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erdos, P., Rényi, A.: On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci 5(1), 17–60 (1960)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.: Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. In: Social Networks, pp. 347–367. Elsevier (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson, M.O.: A survey of network formation models: stability and efficiency. In: Group Formation in Economics: Networks, Clubs, and Coalitions, vol. 664, pp. 11–49 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, N.: Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, vol. 19. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moskvina, A., Liu, J.: How to build your network? A structural analysis. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2016), pp. 2597–2603 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Myers, D.: Relationship rewards. In: Social Psychology, pp. 392–439 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Technical report, Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam, R.D.: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi, R.A., Ahmed, N.K.: The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Skyrms, B., Pemantle, R.: A dynamic model of social network formation. In: Gross, T., Sayama, H. (eds.) Adaptive Networks. UCS, pp. 231–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01284-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Tong, H., Faloutsos, C., Pan, J.Y.: Fast random walk with restart and its applications. In: Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2006), pp. 613–622. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 279–292 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan, B., Chen, Y., Liu, J.: Dynamic relationship building: exploitation versus exploration on a social network (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yan, B., Liu, Y., Liu, J., Cai, Y., Su, H., Zheng, H.: From the periphery to the core: information brokerage in an evolving network. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-2018), pp. 3912–3918 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, H., Su, H., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Yan, B., Zheng, H. (2020). Can Reinforcement Learning Enhance Social Capital?. In: U, L., Yang, J., Cai, Y., Karlapalem, K., Liu, A., Huang, X. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering. WISE 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1155. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3281-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3281-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3280-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3281-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics