Skip to main content

Denoising Images with Varying Noises Using Autoencoders

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Vision and Image Processing (CVIP 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1148))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Image processing techniques are readily used in the field of sciences and computer vision for the enhancement of images and extraction of useful information from them. A key step used in image processing involves the removal of different kinds of noises from the images. Noises can arise in an image during the process of storing, transmitting or acquiring the images. A model qualifies as a satisfactory de-noising model if it satisfies image preservation along with noise removal. There can be various kind of noises in an image such as Gaussian, salt and pepper, Speckle etc. A model which can denoise a different kind of noises is considered to be superior to others. In this paper, we have designed a model using autoencoder which can remove several kinds of noises from images. We have performed a comparative study between the accuracy of each kind using PSNR, SSIM and RMSE values. An increase in the PSNR and SSIM values was seen from the original and noisy image to the original and reconstructed image while a decrease was seen in the value of RMSE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shih, F.Y.: Image Processing and Mathematical Morphology: Fundamentals and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Katiyar, A., Katiyar, G.: Denoising of images using neural network: a review. In: Advances in System Optimization and Control, pp. 223–227. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0665-5_20

  3. Boyat, A.K., Joshi, B.K.: A review paper: noise models in digital image processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.03489 (2015)

  4. Kamble, V.M., Bhurchandi, K.: Noise estimation and quality assessment of Gaussian noise corrupted images. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. vol. 331, no. 1. IOP Publishing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, V., et al.: Adaptive type-2 fuzzy approach for filtering salt and pepper noise in grayscale images. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(5), 3170–3176 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maity, A., et al.: A comparative study on approaches to speckle noise reduction in images. In: 2015 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Networks. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Le, Q.V.: A tutorial on deep learning part 2: autoencoders, convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks. Google Brain 1–20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bojanowski, P., et al.: Optimizing the latent space of generative networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05776 (2017)

  9. Holden, D., et al.: Learning motion manifolds with convolutional autoencoders. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Technical Briefs. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bengio, Y.: Learning deep architectures for AI. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2(1), 1–127 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinton, G.E., Osindero, S., Teh, Y.W.: A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural comput. 18(7), 1527–1554 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Vincent, P., et al.: Stacked denoising autoencoders: learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11(Dec), 3371–3408 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Erhan, D., Bengio, Y., Courville, A.C., Manzagol, P., Vincent, P., Bengio, S.: Why does unsupervised pre-training help deep learning? J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 625–660 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Doersch, C., Gupta, A., Efros, A.A.: Unsupervised visual representation learning by context prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, X., Gupta, A.: Unsupervised learning of visual representations using videos. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2794–2802 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pathak, D., et al.: Context encoders: feature learning by inpainting. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016). Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gatys, L.A., Ecker, A.S., Bethge, M.: Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noh, H., Hong, S., Han, B.: Learning deconvolution network for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Recht, B., et al.: Do CIFAR-10 classifiers generalize to CIFAR-10?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.00451 (2018)

  20. Creswell, A., Arulkumaran, K., Bharath, A.A.: On denoising autoencoders trained to minimise binary cross-entropy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.08487 (2017)

  21. Zhang, Z.: Improved adam optimizer for deep neural networks. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS). IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cecotti, H., Gardiner, B.: Classification of images using semi-supervised learning and structural similarity measure. In: Irish Machine Vision and Image Processing Conference. Irish Pattern Recognition and Classification Society (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanabe, Y., Ishida, T.: Quantification of the accuracy limits of image registration using peak signal-to-noise ratio. Radiol. Phys. Technol. 10(1), 91–94 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Brassington, G.: Mean absolute error and root mean square error: which is the better metric for assessing model performance? In: EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, vol. 19 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dong, L.-F., et al.: Learning deep representations using convolutional auto-encoders with symmetric skip connections. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), p. 2018. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gondara, L.: Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoders. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maroti Deshmukh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Agarwal, S., Agarwal, A., Deshmukh, M. (2020). Denoising Images with Varying Noises Using Autoencoders. In: Nain, N., Vipparthi, S., Raman, B. (eds) Computer Vision and Image Processing. CVIP 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1148. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4018-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4018-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4017-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4018-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics