Abstract
The resource description framework is a method which help us to interchange and reuse of metadata. Early metadata gives a simple method for performing and reporting Data checks. Checks are indicated in an intuitive way to find at which extend we find the relevant data. Moreover, to create vocabularies to handle metadata of larger data sets and to capture the correct relation between the objects we needed some framework that results us reliable. Resource description framework is XML application which follow organize rules to give clear method of explaining semantics. RDF is a data model. It is simple model which have different statement about resources. Resource can be any object. RDF gave metadata of web data and gave structural information. UML data can also be explained in form of RDF that is quite a fruitful in field of RDF. Transformation from UML to RDF, XML help eminently. Metadata of class diagram acquire through XML then Parsing of XML pledge metadata and retinue the RDF rules to change metadata into RDF Triples. Triple include subject, predicate and object. Which transmits a sense of a sentence. Further we store triples in RDF system. This technique helps to keep data useful for many generations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Purvis, M., Cranefield, S.: UML as an ontology modelling language (1999)
Margaritopoulos, M., et al.: Automatic metadata generation by utilising preexisting metadata of related resources. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 3(4), 292–304 (2008)
Albassuny, B.M.: Automatic metadata generation applications: a survey study. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 3(4), 260–282 (2008)
Jenkins, C., et al.: Automatic RDF metadata generation for resource discovery. Comput. Netw. 31(11-14), 1305–1320 (1999)
Stevens, P.: Small-scale XMI programming: a revolution in UML tool use? Autom. Softw. Eng. 10(1), 7–21 (2003)
Kovse, J., Härder, T.: Generic XMI-based UML model transformations. In: Bellahsène, Z., Patel, D., Rolland, C. (eds.) OOIS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2425, pp. 192–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46102-7_24
Tong, Q., Zhang, F., Cheng, J.: Construction of RDF (S) from UML class diagrams. J. Comput. Inf. Technol. 22(4), 237–250 (2014)
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web: a new form of web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities [electronic resource]. Sci. Am. 284, 34–43 (2001)
Erdmann, M., Studer, R.: How to structure and access XML documents with ontologies. Data Knowl. Eng. 36(3), 317–335 (2001)
Berners-Lee, T.: Semantic Web–A Guide to the Future XML Web Services and Knowledge Management. Weaving the Web. Harper San Francisco, San Francisco (1999)
Melnik, S.: Bridging the Gap between RDF and XML. 17 (1999). Accessed 26 Feb 2006
Scholl, B., Amann, I., Fundulaki, M., Beeri, C., Vercoustre, A.M.: Mapping XML fragments to community web ontologies (2001)
Klein, M.: Interpreting XML documents via an RDF schema ontology. In: 2002 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Proceedings. IEEE (2002)
Thuy, P.T.T., et al.: Transforming valid XML documents into RDF via RDF schema. In: 2007 Third International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices, NWeSP 2007. IEEE (2007)
Candan, K.S., Liu, H., Suvarna, R.: Resource description framework: metadata and its applications. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newslett. 3(1), 6–19 (2001)
Forsberg, K., Dannstedt, L.: Extensible use of RDF in a business context. Comput. Netw. 33(1-6), 347–364 (2000)
Dhingra, V., Bhatia, K.K.: Metadata: towards machine-enabled intelligence. Int. J. Web Semant. Technol. 3(3), 121 (2012)
Greenberg, J.: Metadata extraction and harvesting: a comparison of two automatic metadata generation applications. J. Internet Cataloging 6(4), 59–82 (2004)
Noufal, P.P.: Metadata: automatic generation and extraction (2005)
Wang, F., Li, J., Homayounfar, H.: A space efficient XML DOM parser. Data Knowl. Eng. 60(1), 185–207 (2007)
Aghaei, S., Nematbakhsh, M.A., Farsani, H.K.: Evolution of the world wide web: from WEB 1.0 TO WEB 4.0. Int. J. Web Semant. Technol. 3(1), 1 (2012)
Lu, W., Chiu, K., Pan, Y.: A parallel approach to XML parsing. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing. IEEE Computer Society (2006)
Decker, S., et al.: The semantic web: the roles of XML and RDF. IEEE Internet Comput. 4(5), 63–73 (2000)
Cranefield, S.: UML and the semantic web (2001)
Jain, A., Farkas, C.: Secure resource description framework: an access control model. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies. ACM (2006)
Corby, O., Dieng, R., Hébert, C.: A conceptual graph model for W3C resource description framework. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS-ConceptStruct 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1867, pp. 468–482. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/10722280_32
Klein, M.: XML, RDF, and relatives. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2), 26–28 (2001)
Miller, E.: An introduction to the resource description framework. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 25(1), 15–19 (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Riaz, A., Bajwa, I.S., Ali, M. (2020). Automatic RDF, Metadata Generation from Legacy Software Models. In: Bajwa, I., Sibalija, T., Jawawi, D. (eds) Intelligent Technologies and Applications. INTAP 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1198. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5232-8_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5232-8_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5231-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5232-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)