Skip to main content

Container Cluster Scheduling Strategy Based on Delay Decision Under Multidimensional Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science (ICPCSEE 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1257))

  • 1211 Accesses

Abstract

With the rise of online applications such as machine learning, stream processing, and interactive data-intensive applications in shared clusters, container cluster scheduling in data centers is facing new challenges. In order to solve the problem that application performance and economic cost cannot be balanced in a container cluster deploying a hybrid application, this paper proposes a container cluster scheduling strategy based on delay decision under multi-dimensional constraints. Formal language-based application placement constraints were introduced, and a task reorder model was established based on delayed decision-making. The experiments show that this strategy improves application performance and cluster utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vavilapalli, V.K., Murthy, A.C., Douglas, C.: Apache Hadoop YARN: yet another resource negotiator. In: Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 1–16. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Martín, A.: TensorFlow: learning functions at scale. In: ACM Sigplan International Conference on Functional Programming, p. 1. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verma, A., Pedrosa, L., Korupolu, M.: Large-scale cluster management at Google with Borg. In: Tenth European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 1–17. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xingcan, C., Xiaohui, Y., Yang, L.: Overview of distributed stream processing technology. Comput. Res. Develop. 52(2), 318–332 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J.: TensorFlow: a system for large-scale machine learning. In: Usenix Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 265–283. USENIX Association (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zaharia, M., Chowdhury, M., Franklin, M.J.: Spark: cluster computing with working sets. In: Usenix Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, p. 10. USENIX Association (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Apache HBase[EB/OL] (2018). http://hbase.apache.org

  8. Jyothi, S.A., Curino, C., Menache, I.: Morpheus: towards automated SLOs for enterprise clusters. In: Usenix Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 117–134. USENIX Association (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rajan, K., Kakadia, D., Curino, C.: PerfOrator: eloquent performance models for Resource Optimization. In: ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 415–427. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, G., Xu, C.-Z.: Prometheus: online estimation of optimal memory demands for workers in in-memory distributed computation. In: ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 655–667. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alibaba trace [DB/OL] (2018). https://github.com/alibaba/clusterdata

  12. Nathuji, R., Kansal, A., Ghaffarkhah, A.: Q-clouds: managing performance interference effects for QoS-aware clouds. In: European Conference on Computer Systems, Proceedings of the, European Conference on Computer Systems, EUROSYS 2010, Paris, France, April, pp. 237–250. DBLP (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Avadi, B., Abawajy, J., Buyya, R.: Failure-aware resource provisioning for hybrid Cloud infrastructure. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 72(10), 1318–1331 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tumanov, A., Zhu, T., Park, J.W.: TetriSched: global rescheduling with adaptive plan-ahead in dynamic heterogeneous clusters. In: Eleventh European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 35–36. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hindman, B., Konwinski, A., Zaharia, M.: Mesos: a platform for fine-grained resource sharing in the data center. In: Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 429–483. USENIX Association (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karanasos, K., Suresh, A., Douglas, C.: Advancements in YARN resource manager 43(3), 51–60 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verma, A., Pedrosa, L., Korupolu, M.: Large-scale cluster management at Google with Borg. In: Tenth European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 1–17. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ananthanarayanan, G., Kandula, S., Greenberg, A.: Reining in the outliers in map-reduce clusters using Mantri. In: Usenix Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 265–278. USENIX Association (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ferguson, A.D., Bodik, P., Kandula, S.: Jockey: guaranteed job latency in data parallel clusters. In: European Conference on Computer Systems, EUROSYS, pp. 99–112 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zaharia, M., Konwinski, A., Joseph, A.D.: Improving MapReduce performance in heterogeneous environments. In: Usenix Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 29–42. USENIX Association (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boutin, E., Ekanayake, J., Lin, W.: Apollo: scalable and coordinated scheduling for cloud-scale computing. In: Usenix Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 285–300. USENIX Association (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ousterhout, K., Wendell, P., Zaharia, M.: Sparrow: distributed, low latency scheduling. In: Twenty-Fourth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, pp. 69–84 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ghodsi, A., Zaharia, M., Shenker, S.: Choosy: max-min fair sharing for datacenter jobs with constraints. In: ACM European Conference on Computer Systems, pp. 365–378 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Isard, M., Prabhakaran, V., Currey, J.: Quincy: fair scheduling for distributed computing clusters. In: IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Systems, pp. 261–276 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61762008), the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Project (No. 2017GXNSFAA198141), and the National Key Research and Development Project of China (No. 2018YFB1404404).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ningjiang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xue, Y., Chen, N., Xie, Y. (2020). Container Cluster Scheduling Strategy Based on Delay Decision Under Multidimensional Constraints. In: Zeng, J., Jing, W., Song, X., Lu, Z. (eds) Data Science. ICPCSEE 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1257. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7981-3_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7981-3_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7980-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7981-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics