Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Type-2 Fuzzy Set Aggregation and Health Status Mining from Condition-Monitoring Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 216))

  • 1079 Accesses

Abstract

The study focuses on health monitoring applications performing Fault Identification (FI) and Maintenance Indication (MI). In industry, third-party algorithms based on artificial intelligence could be supplied in closed-source. For this reason, they may lack of customization, or retraining, that leads to a possible poor performance. The work proposes a system called Fuzzy Set Aggregator (FSA) receiving in input unstable classifier predictions over time and provides a stable MI signal with a reasonable degree of anticipation. Uncertainty quantification and management are embedded in the aggregation process by using the type-2 fuzzy set theory. Four system variants are tested through simulation with data extracted from a real-case study. Two FSA variants were able to anticipate the expected reference values, providing valuable signals to plan maintenance at a reduced cost, and showing a performance improvement when the uncertainty due to expert opinion is greater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zonta T, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R, de Lima MJ, da Trindade ES, Li GP (2020) Comput Ind Eng 150:106889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889

  2. Baur M, Albertelli P, Monno M (2020) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107(5):2843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05202-3

  3. Peng Y, Dong M, Zuo MJ (2010) Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50(1):297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2482-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodo R, Bertocco M, Bianchi A (2020) 2020 IEEE international workshop on metrology for industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0&IoT) (2020 IEEE MetroInd40&IoT) (Rome, Italy, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT48571.2020.9138294

  5. Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A (2018) Foundations of machine learning, 2nd edn. Adaptive computation and machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gao Z, Cecati C, Ding SX (2015) IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(6):3757. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2417501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cai B, Huang L, Xie M (2017) IEEE Trans Ind Inform 13(5):2227. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2695583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Verbert K, Babuška R, De Schutter B (2017) Eng Appl Artif Intell 60:136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittal K, Jain A, Vaisla KS, Castillo O, Kacprzyk J (2020) Eng Appl Artif Intell 95:103916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103916

  10. Mendel JM, John RIB (2002) IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):117. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.995115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zadeh L (1965) Inf Control 8(3):338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudec M (2016)Fuzziness in information systems. Springer International Publishing, p 198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42518-4

  13. Mo H, Wang FY, Zhou M, Li R, Xiao Z (2014) Inf Sci 272:96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadollah A (2018) Sadollah A (ed.) Fuzzy logic based in optimization methods and control systems and its applications. IntechOpen, Rijeka. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79552

  15. Mendel J (2007) Inf Sci 177:84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Torshizi AD, Zarandi MHF, Zakeri H (2015) Appl Soft Comput 27:614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.04.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakraverty S, Sahoo DM, Mahato NR (2019) Defuzzification. Springer, Singapore, pp 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7430-2_7

  18. Karnik N, Mendel J, Liang Q (2000) IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7:643. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.811231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Azadegan A, Porobic L, Ghazinoory S, Samouei P, Saman Kheirkhah A (2011) Int J Prod Econ 132(2):258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kabir S, Papadopoulos Y (2018) Int J Approx Reason 100:29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao Q, Samet A, Zanni-Merk C, De Bertrand F, de Beuvron C, Reich, (2019) Procedia Comput Sci 159:630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.218

  22. Decker L, Leite D, Giommi L, Bonacorsi D (2020) Real-time anomaly detection in data centers for log-based predictive maintenance using an evolving fuzzy-rule-based approach

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arnaldi I (2019) Design of sigma-delta converters in MATLAB®/Simulink®. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91539-5

  24. Hansun S (2013) 2013 conference on new media studies (CoNMedia), pp 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CoNMedia.2013.6708545

  25. Wynn HP (1985) J Forecast 4(3):315. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3980040310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Klinker F (2011) Math Semesterber 58(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00591-010-0080-8

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Neil S (2007) Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics, vol 1–3. SAGE Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, California. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87481-2_21

  28. Bodo R, Bertocco M, Bianchi A (2021) Submitted to: 2021 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC) (I2MTC 2021). Glasgow, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bedford T, Quigley J, Walls L (2006) Stat Sci 21(4):428. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27645780

  30. Hanratty TP, Hammell R (2019) 2019 IEEE 17th international conference on software engineering research, management and applications (SERA), pp 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA.2019.8886799

  31. Wohlin C, Runeson P, Hst M, Ohlsson MC, Regnell B, Wessln A (2012) Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2

  32. Anderson TW (2011) Anderson–darling tests of goodness-of-fit. Springer, Berlin, pp 52–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_118

  33. McKnight PE, Najab J (2010) Mann-whitney U test. American Cancer Society, p 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0524

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Carel Industries SpA for the domain-knowledge support associated to the aging of the monitored system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Engineering, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy

    Roberto Bodo & Matteo Bertocco

  2. Carel Industries Spa, Padova, Italy

    Alberto Bianchi

Authors
  1. Roberto Bodo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Bertocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alberto Bianchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Bodo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Middlesex University, London, UK

    Xin-She Yang

  2. The University of Reading, Reading, UK

    Simon Sherratt

  3. JIS University, Kolkata, India

    Nilanjan Dey

  4. Global Knowledge Research Foundation, Ahmedabad, India

    Amit Joshi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bodo, R., Bertocco, M., Bianchi, A. (2022). Type-2 Fuzzy Set Aggregation and Health Status Mining from Condition-Monitoring Applications. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 216. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1781-2_87

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation