Skip to main content

Implementation-Free Forensic Watermarking for Adaptive Streaming with A/B Watermarking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 235))

Abstract

Forensic watermarking enables the identification of digital pirates after they illegally re-distribute copyright-protected videos. For adaptive streaming, these methods are best combined with A/B watermarking, in which two watermarked versions are created for each video segment, and subsequently mixed in order to create a large number of uniquely watermarked videos. Although good video quality and low bitrate are key characteristics of a good watermarking system, existing methods objectively lower the compression efficiency. Additionally, they often require complex implementations. Therefore, this paper proposes an implementation-free, rate-distortion-preserving watermarking technique to be used with the scalable A/B watermarking concept. Even though the embedding is performed during compression, it does not change the existing video encoder implementation. Instead, it only changes the target bitrate parameter in order to create different compression artifacts. These artifacts represent the watermark but are not noticeable due to high-quality coding. As such, the rate-distortion performance is nearly equal to that of ordinary, unwatermarked compression (i.e., a BD-rate of 0.02% and \(-0.10\)% when applied with H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC encoders, respectively). Furthermore, the robustness is equal or better than state-of-the-art methods with comparable embedding complexities. More specifically, in case of recompression attacks, nonzero false negative rates are only reported when a watermarked video is initially compressed with a high quality and degraded to a very low quality. Consequently, the proposed scheme can be used in practice by adaptive-streaming platforms without a quality decrease, bitrate increase, or implementation overhead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jarnikov D, Hietbrink E, Arana M, Doumene JM (2014) A watermarking system for adaptive streaming. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on consumer electronics (ICCE), pp 375–377, Jan 2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mathew R, Cushing C (2020) Netflix to slash traffic across Europe to relieve virus strain on internet providers. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN21906P. Posted 22 Mar 2020, Accessed 17 Aug 2020

  3. Kim KS, Lee HY, Im DH, Lee HK (2008) Practical, real-time, and robust watermarking on the spatial domain for high-definition video contents. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E91-D(5):1359–1368

    Google Scholar 

  4. Piva A, Bianchi T, Rosa AD (2010) Secure client-side ST-DM watermark embedding. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 5(1):13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fautier T (2020) Ultra HD Forum guidelines, v2.2. Technical report, Ultra HD Forum

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu J, He X (2005) A review study on digital watermarking. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information communication technologies, ICICT 2005, pp 337–341

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asikuzzaman M, Pickering MR (2018) An overview of digital video watermarking. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 28(9):2131–2153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox IJ, Kilian J, Leighton FT, Shamoon T (1997) Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia. IEEE Trans Image Process 6(12):1673–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barni M, Bartolini F, Cappellini V, Piva A (1998) A DCT-domain system for robust image watermarking. Signal Process 66(3):357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Islam SMM, Debnath R, Hossain SKA (2007) DWT based digital watermarking technique and its robustness on image rotation, scaling, JPEG compression, cropping and multiple watermarking. Proceedings of the international conference on information communication technologies, ICICT 2007, pp 246–249

    Google Scholar 

  11. Asikuzzaman M, Alam MJ, Lambert AJ, Pickering MR (2014) Imperceptible and robust blind video watermarking using chrominance embedding: a set of approaches in the DT CWT domain. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 9(9):1502–1517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meerwald P, Uhl A (2011) Robust watermarking of H.264/SVC-encoded video: quality and resolution scalability. In: Proceedings of the international conference on digital watermarking, IWDW’10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 159–169

    Google Scholar 

  13. Aparna J, Ayyappan S(2015) Image watermarking using Diffie Hellman key exchange algorithm. Procedia Comput Sci 46:1684–1691. Proceedings of the international conference on information communication technologies, ICICT 2014

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buhari AM, Ling HC, Baskaran VM, Wong K (2016) Fast watermarking scheme for real-time spatial scalable video coding. Signal Process Image Commun 47:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coria LE, Pickering MR, Nasiopoulos P, Ward RK (2008) A video watermarking scheme based on the dual-tree complex wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 3(3):466–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen W, Shahid Z, Stütz T, Autrusseau F, Le Callet P (2014) Robust drift-free bit-rate preserving H.264 watermarking. Multimed Syst 20(2):179–193

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mareen H, Courteaux M, De Praeter J, Asikuzzaman M, Van Wallendael G, Lambert P (2020) Rate-distortion-preserving forensic watermarking using quantization parameter variation. IEEE Access 8:63700–63709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li B, Li H, Li L, Zhang J (2014) \(\lambda \) domain rate control algorithm for high efficiency video coding. IEEE Trans Image Process 23(9):3841–3854

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Zupancic I, Naccari M, Mrak M, Izquierdo E (2017) Two-pass rate control for improved quality of experience in UHDTV delivery. IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process 11(1):167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox I, Miller M, Bloom J, Fridrich J, Kalker T (2008) Digital watermarking and steganography, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mareen H, De Praeter J, Van Wallendael G, Lambert P (2019) Traitor tracing after visible watermark removal. In: Yoo CD, Shi YQ, Kim HJ, Piva A, Kim G (eds) Digital forensics and watermarking, IWDW’18. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 110–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Urvoy M, Autrusseau F (2014) Application of Grubbs’ test for outliers to the detection of watermarks. In: Proceedings of the ACM workshop on information hiding multimedia security (IH&MMSec). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 49–60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mareen H, De Praeter J, Van Wallendael G, Lambert P (2018) A novel video watermarking approach based on implicit distortions. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 64(3):250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalker T, Linnartz J, Depovere G, Maes M (1998) On the reliability of detecting electronic watermarks in digital images. In: Proceedings of the European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp 1–4, Sept 1998

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miller ML, Bloom JA (1999) Computing the probability of false watermark detection. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on information hiding, pp 146–158

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bossen F (2013) Common test conditions and software reference configurations. Technical report, JCTVC-L1100, ITU-T Joint Collaborative Team on Video Coding (JCT-VC), Jan 2013

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bjøntegaard G (2001) Calculation of average PSNR differences between RD-curves. Technical report, VCEG-M33, ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG), Apr 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) under Grant 1S55218N. Additionally, it was supported by IDLab (Ghent University—imec), Flanders Innovation & Entrepreneurship (VLAIO), and the European Union. Moreover, the computational resources (STEVIN Supercomputer Infrastructure) and services used for the evaluation of our watermarking approach were kindly provided by Ghent University, the Flemish Supercomputer Center (VSC), the Hercules Foundation, and the Flemish Government department EWI. Furthermore, we would like to thank Martijn Courteaux for his valuable input during brainstorming sessions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Mareen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mareen, H., Van Wallendael, G., Lambert, P. (2022). Implementation-Free Forensic Watermarking for Adaptive Streaming with A/B Watermarking. In: Yang, XS., Sherratt, S., Dey, N., Joshi, A. (eds) Proceedings of Sixth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 235. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2377-6_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics