Skip to main content

Equilibria Between Two Sets of Pairwise Comparisons as Solutions of Decision-Making with Orthogonal Criteria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 463 Accesses

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 238))

Abstract

This paper deals with a type of decision-making that pairwise comparisons specify which alternative is better concerning two criteria and that chosen alternative selects one of the criteria. Solutions to the decision-making are regarded as equilibria of a normal form game of two players. The equilibria are sought by drawing directed graphs that consist of nodes, arrows, and undirected edges. Each node of the graphs is a pair of a criterion and an alternative. An arrow represents which one prefers to another between two nodes. Weights, how better nodes are, can be put on arrows. An undirected edge connects indifferent two nodes. Throughout two examples of decision-making in this paper, how to seek the equilibria, pure and mixed, from the graphs are explained. In one of them, votes create weights on the arrows of the graphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nash, J.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 36(1), 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: Proposal of new AHP model in light of dominant relationship among alternatives. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn. 42(2), 180–197 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Kinoshita, E., Nakanishi, M.: A proposal of CCM as a processing technique for additional data in the dominant AHP. J. Infrastructure Planning Manage. IV-42-611, 13–19 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mizuno, T.: A diagram for finding nash equilibria in two-players strategic form games. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds.) Intelligent Decision Technologies, IDT 2020, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 193. Springer, Singapore (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takafumi Mizuno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mizuno, T. (2021). Equilibria Between Two Sets of Pairwise Comparisons as Solutions of Decision-Making with Orthogonal Criteria. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 238. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2765-1_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics