Skip to main content

The Visualization of Innovation Pathway Based on Patent Data—Comparison Between Japan and America

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2021

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 241))

Abstract

Innovation trends are a crucial factor in determining one country’s industrial development, and with the progress of modern machine learning technology, many are studying patent document analysis. People consider patents to contain important information for analyzing the innovation process, but patents contain much complicated jargon, and the methods for extracting information were limited. The authors applied the document analysis and visualization method newly proposed in the previous research and tried to compare the innovation process for patent documents as a whole within a certain period between Japan and the United States. As a result, we realized that in the 15 years, the topic vibration in Japan is more stable than in the US, and the contents in US patents are more concentrated than those in Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The following Sects. 22.2.4 and 22.2.5 refer to the research method of Miao et al. [4].

  2. 2.

    This analysis used R for visualization.

References

  1. Fujiwara, S., Matsumoto, Y., Suge, A., Takahashi, H.: Constructing a valuation system through patent document analysis. In: Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2020, pp. 321–330. Springer, Singapore (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matsumoto, Y., Suge, A., Takahashi, H.: Capturing corporate attributes in a new perspective through fuzzy clustering. In: JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 19–33. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matsumoto, Y., Suge A., Takahashi, H.: Analysis of the relationship between technological diversification and valuation of company. The 27th Annual Meeting Program of the Japan Finance Association (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miao, Z., Du, J., Dong, F., Liu, Y., Wang, X.: Identifying technology evolution pathways using topic variation detection based on patent data: a case study of 3D printing. Future 118 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mahnken, T., Moehrle, M.: Multi-cross-industry innovation patents in the USA—a combination of PATSTAT and Orbis search. World Patent Inf. 55, 52–60 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kurogi, Y., Akaike, S.: Extraction of R&D Areas through expert workshops on science and technology innovation think tanks. Science and Technology Policy Research Institute. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. https://www.nistep.go.jp/archives/45832. Last accessed 6 Oct 2020

  7. Kimura, H.: Changes in industrial structure and innovation from the perspective of patents. Policy Research Institute (2017). https://www.mof.go.jp/pri/research/conference/00report/inv2017/inv2017_report07.pdf

  8. Nishikawa, K., Ohashi, H.: Current status of innovation in Japan through international comparison. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoneyama, S., Watanabe, T., Yamauchi, I., Manabe, S., Iwata, S.: Comparative study of open innovation activities in Japanese, American and European companies. Gakushuin Univ. Econ. Rev. 54(1) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Policy Director, Economic and Fiscal Analysis: World Business Report for the first half of 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Namba, H., Fujii, A., Iwayama, M., Hashimoto, T.: Analysis of technological trends for treatises and patents. 7th and 8th NTCIR Workshops Patent Mining Tasks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kong, D., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Xue, L.: Using the data mining method to assess the innovation gap: a case of industrial robotics in a catching-up country. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 119(2017), 80–89 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mekala, D., Gupta, V., Paranjape, B., & Karnick, H.: SCDV: Sparse Composite Document Vectors using soft clustering over distributional representations. arXiv:1612.06778 (2016)

  14. Douglas, R.: Gaussian Mixture Models. Encyclopedia of Biometrics, pp. 827–832 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, P., Huang, M., Xu, P., Li, W., Usadi, A., Zhu, X.: Generating breakpoint-based timeline overview for new topic retrospection. In: 11th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiyan Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, Z., Matsumoto, Y., Suge, A., Takahashi, H. (2021). The Visualization of Innovation Pathway Based on Patent Data—Comparison Between Japan and America. In: Jezic, G., Chen-Burger, J., Kusek, M., Sperka, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agents and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications 2021. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 241. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2994-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics