Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Analysis of the Content in Social Networks During COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Networking, Intelligent Systems and Security

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 237))

  • 934 Accesses

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Internet and SN technologies are an effective resource for disease surveillance and a good way to communicate to prevent disease outbreaks. In December 2019, the frequency of the words COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, and pandemic was very low in online environment, being only few posts informing that, “the mysterious coronavirus in China could spread.” After March 1, 2020, there have been numerous research projects that analyze the flows of messages in social networks in order to perform real-time analyses, to follow the trends of the pandemic evolution, to identify new disease outbreaks, and to elaborate better predictions. In this context, this study analyzes the posts collected during [August–September 2020], on the Twitter network, that contain the word “COVID-19,” written both in Romanian and English. For the Romanian language posts, we obtained a dictionary of the words used, for which it was calculated their occurrence frequency in the multitude of tweets collected and pre-processed. The frequency of words for non-noisy messages was identified from the multitude of words in the obtained dictionary. For the equivalent of these words in English, we obtained the probability density of words in the extracted and pre-processed posts written in English on Twitter. This study also identifies the percentage of similarity between tweets that contain words with a high frequency of apparition. The similarity for the collected and pre-processed tweets that have “ro.” in the filed called Language has been computed making use of Levenshtein algorithm. These calculations are intended to quickly help find the relevant posts related to the situation generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is well known that the costs of analyzing data from social networks are very low compared to the costs involved in analyzing data from the centers of government agencies; therefore, the proposed method may be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avci, C., Tekinerdogan, B., Athanasiadis, I.N.: Software architectures for big data: a systematic literature review. Big Data Anal. 5(1), 1–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41044-020-00045-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo, H.D., Zhang, L., Zhu, L.W.: Earth observation big data for climate change research. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 6(2), 108–117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, P., Hu, H.: Geographical patterns of traffic congestion in growing megacities: big data analytics from Beijing. Cities 92, 164–174 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan, C., Sun, L., Liu, K.: Big data architecture for pervasive healthcare: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems, pp. 26–29. Münster, Germany (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fitzgerald, R.C.: Big data is crucial to the early detection of cancer. Nat. Med. 26(1), 19–20 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Moustafa, K.: Make good use of big data: a home for everyone, Elsevier public health emergency collection. Cities 107, (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kramer, A., Guillory, J., Hancock, J.: Experimental evidence of massive scale emotional contagion through social networks. PNAS 111(24), 8788–8790 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Banerjee, S., Jenamani, M., Pratihar, D.K.: A survey on influence maximization in a social network. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 62, 3417–3455 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yue, Y.: Scale adaptation of text sentiment analysis algorithm in big data environment: Twitter as data source. In: Atiquzzaman, M., Yen, N., Xu, Z. (eds.) Big Data Analytics for Cyber-Physical System in Smart City. BDCPS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1117, pp. 629–634. Springer, Singapore (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Badaoui, F., Amar, A., Ait Hassou, L., et al.: Dimensionality reduction and class prediction algorithm with application to microarray big data. J. Big Data 4, 32 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Teodorescu, H.N.L., Pirnau, M.: In: Muhammad Nazrul Islam (ed.) Cap 6: ICT for Early Assessing the Disaster Amplitude, for Relief Planning, and for Resilience Improvement (2020). e-ISBN: 9781785619977

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shan, S., Zhao, F.R., Wei, Y., Liu, M.: Disaster management 2.0: a real-time disaster damage assessment model based on mobile social media data—A case study of Weibo (Chinese Twitter). Saf. Sci. 115, 393–413 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Teodorescu, H.N.L.: Using analytics and social media for monitoring and mitigation of social disasters. Procedia Eng. 107C, 325–334 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pirnau, M.: Tool for monitoring web sites for emergency-related posts and post analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), pp. 1–6. Bucharest, Romania, 14–17 Oct (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, B., Zhuang, J.: Crisis information distribution on Twitter: a content analysis of tweets during hurricane sandy. Nat. Hazards 89(1), 161–181 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson, M., Olsson, E.K.: Facebook and Twitter in crisis communication: a comparative study of crisis communication professionals and citizens. J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 24(4), 198–208 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Laylavi, F., Rajabifard, A., Kalantari, M.: Event relatedness assessment of Twitter messages for emergency response. Inf. Process. Manage. 53(1), 266–280 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Banujan, K., Banage Kumara, T.G.S., Paik, I.: Twitter and online news analytics for enhancing post-natural disaster management activities. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST), pp. 302–307. Fukuoka (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Takahashi, B., Tandoc, E.C., Carmichael, C.: Communicating on Twitter during a disaster: an analysis of tweets during typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 392–398 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Teodorescu, H.N.L., Pirnau, M.: Analysis of requirements for SN monitoring applications in disasters—a case study. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 1–6. Ploiesti, Romania (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed, W., Bath, P.A., Sbaffi, L., Demartini, G.: Novel insights into views towards H1N1 during the 2009 pandemic: a thematic analysis of Twitter data. Health Inf. Libr. J. 36, 60–72 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Asadzadeh, A., Kötter, T., Salehi, P., Birkmann, J.: Operationalizing a concept: the systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduction 25, 147–162 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teodorescu, H.N.L., Saharia, N.: A semantic analyzer for detecting attitudes on SNs. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (COMM), pp. 47–50. Bucharest, Romania (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teodorescu, H.N.L.: On the responses of social networks’ to external events. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 13–18. Bucharest, Romania (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gottfried, J., Shearer, E.: News use across social media platforms 2016. White Paper, 26. Pew Research Center (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta, A., Lamba, H., Kumaraguru, P., Joshi, A.: Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on twitter during hurricane sandy. In WWW’13 Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 729–736 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–236 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lyu, H., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Luo, J.: Sense and sensibility: characterizing social media users regarding the use of controversial terms for COVID-19. IEEE Trans. Big Data (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Teodorescu, H.N.L., Bolea, S.C.: On the algorithmic role of synonyms and keywords in analytics for catastrophic events. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, ECAI, pp. 1–6. Ploiesti, Romania (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Teodorescu, H.N.L.: Emergency-related, social network time series: description and analysis. In: Rojas, I., Pomares, H. (eds.) Time Series Analysis and Forecasting. Contributions to Statistics, pp. 205–215. Springer, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bolea, S.C.: Vocabulary, synonyms and sentiments of hazard-related posts on social networks. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference Speech Technology and Human-Computer Dialogue (SpeD), pp. 1–6. Bucharest, Romania (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bolea, S.C.: Language processes and related statistics in the posts associated to disasters on social networks. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 11(5), 602–612 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Teodorescu, H.N.L.: Survey of IC&T in disaster mitigation and disaster situation management, Chapter 1. In: Teodorescu, H.-N., Kirschenbaum, A., Cojocaru, S., Bruderlein, C. (eds.), Improving Disaster Resilience and Mitigation—IT Means and Tools. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series—C, pp. 3–22. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kanis, J., Skorkovská, L.: Comparison of different lemmatization approaches through the means of information retrieval performance. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Text, Speech and Dialogue TSD'10, pp. 93–100 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ferrucci, D., Lally, A.: UIMA: an architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment. Nat. Lang. Eng. 10(3–4), 327–348 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobs, P.S.: Joining statistics with NLP for text categorization. In: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 178–185 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jivani, A.G.: A comparative study of stemming algorithms. Int. J Comp Tech. Appl 2, 1930–1938 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ingason, A.K., Helgadóttir, S., Loftsson, H., Rögnvaldsson, E.: A mixed method lemmatization algorithm using a hierarchy of linguistic identities (HOLI). In: Raante, A., Nordström, B. (eds.), Advances in Natural Language Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5221, pp. 205–216. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Krouska, A., Troussas, C., Virvou, M.: The effect of preprocessing techniques on Twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications, pp. 13–15. Chalkidiki, Greece (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Babanejad, N., Agrawal, A., An, A., Papagelis, M.: A comprehensive analysis of preprocessing for word representation learning in affective tasks. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5799–5810 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Camacho-Collados, J., Pilehvar, M.T.: On the role of text preprocessing in neural network architectures: an evaluation study on text categorization and sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pp. 40–46. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Davis, C.A., Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: BotOrNot: a system to evaluate social bots, a system to evaluate social bots. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 273–274 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ferrara, E.: COVID-19 on Twitter: Bots, Conspiracies, and Social Media Activism. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.09531 (2020)

  44. Metaxas, P., Finn, S.T.: The infamous#Pizzagate conspiracy theory: Insight from a Twitter Trails investigation. Wellesley College Faculty Research and Scholarship (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Teodorescu, H.N.L.: Social signals and the ENR index—noise of searches on SN with keyword-based logic conditions. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems. Iasi, Romania (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Aouragh, S.I.: Adaptating Levenshtein distance to contextual spelling correction. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. 12(1), 127–133 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Kobzdej, P.: Parallel application of Levenshtein’s distance to establish similarity between strings. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 12(4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rani, S.; Singh, J.: Enhancing Levenshtein’s edit distance algorithm for evaluating document similarity. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 72–80. Springer, Singapore (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Prof. H.N. Teodorescu for the suggestions on this research and for correcting several preliminary versions of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Informatics, Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania

    Mironela Pirnau

Authors
  1. Mironela Pirnau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mironela Pirnau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco

    Mohamed Ben Ahmed

  2. Technical University of Iasi, Iași, Romania

    Horia-Nicolai L. Teodorescu

  3. National School of Applied Sciences, Ibn Tofail University, Kénitra, Morocco

    Tomader Mazri

  4. Department of Computer Science, Avinashilingam University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Parthasarathy Subashini

  5. Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques of Tangier, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco

    Anouar Abdelhakim Boudhir

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pirnau, M. (2022). An Analysis of the Content in Social Networks During COVID-19 Pandemic. In: Ben Ahmed, M., Teodorescu, HN.L., Mazri, T., Subashini, P., Boudhir, A.A. (eds) Networking, Intelligent Systems and Security. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 237. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3637-0_62

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation