Skip to main content

Fostering Co-UXers in Later Age: Co-designing a UX Toolkit for the Senior Online Community MiOne

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education

Abstract

Over the past few years, an increasing dependence of the general population on information and communication technologies has been observed. As such, inclusive and age-friendly design has been of utmost importance to meet the context of every age cohort. Most of the software development projects tend to focus on the assumption relative to the users’ cognitive models, and when addressing senior citizens, these are very likely to have the risk of falling into stereotypes and non-used products. By contrast, involving senior citizens in the early stages of the design process tends to be crucial. The aim of this paper is to identify and validate a co-design process capable of influencing senior citizens’ experience in online communities. One of the elements of the co-design process that is described in the paper is a co-design toolkit to foster positive user experiences when interacting with online communities. The co-design process involved 36 adult learners from five Universities of the Third Age and 2 coordinators, organized into a set of 17 group sessions in the context of the miOne online community. Besides this co-design toolkit, a set of ‘best practices’ for involving the users in the co-design process and implications on the redesign of a Senior Online Community are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available at: http://www.seduce.pt/ (Date accessed: 20-05-2020).

  2. 2.

    Available at: https://www.mione.altice.pt/ (Date accessed: 20-05-2020).

References

  1. Mathis, E.F., Kim, H.L., Uysal, M., Sirgy, J.M., Prebensen, N.K.: The effect of co-creation experience on outcome variable. Ann. Tour. Res. 57, 62–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed, R., Toscos, T., Rohani Ghahari, R., Holden, R.J., Martin, E., Wagner, S., Daley, C., Coupe, A., Mirro, M.: Visualization of cardiac implantable electronic device data for older adults using participatory design. Appl. Clin. Inform. 10, 707–718 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1695794

  3. Maa, S., Buchmuller, S.: The crucial role of cultural probes in participatory design for and with older adults. I-Com 17, 119–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2018-0015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wikberg-Nilsson, Å., Normark, J., Björklund, C., Axelsson, S.W.: HealthCloud: promoting healthy living through co-design of user experiences in a digital service. Proc. Nord. Des. Era Digit. Nord. 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Veloso, A.I.: O que é o projeto SEDUCE? In: Veloso, A.I. (ed.) SEDUCE—utilização da comunicação e da informação em ecologias web pelo cidadão sénior. Edições Afrontamento/CETAC.MEDIA, Portugal (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P.: Product Experience. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045089-6.X5001-1 (2008)

  7. Kou, Y., Gray, C.M.: A practice-led account of the conceptual evolution of UX knowledge. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—Proceedings, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300279 (2019)

  8. Wiklund, S., Cecilia, A., Åsa, B., Nilsson, W., Normark, J.: Participatory design of user interfaces for senior people’s active aging (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ASLERD: TIMISOARA DECLARATION: Better Learning for a Better World Through People Centred Smart Learning Ecosystems, pp. 1–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kouprie, M., Visser, F.S.: A framework for empathy in design: stepping into and out of the user’s life. J. Eng. Des. 20, 437–448 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902875033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 5–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pejner, M.N., De Morais, W.O., Lundström, J., Laurell, H., Skärsäter, I.: A smart home system for information sharing, health assessments, and medication self-management for older people: protocol for a mixed-methods study. J. Med. Internet Res. 21, 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/12447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, M.J., Kuhn, S.: Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36, 24–28 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1145/153571.255960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reddy, A., Lester, C.A., Stone, J.A., Holden, R.J., Phelan, C.H., Chui, M.A.: Applying participatory design to a pharmacy system intervention. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 15, 1358–1367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns, K.E.A., Jacob, S.K., Aguirre, V., Gomes, J., Mehta, S., Rizvi, L.: Stakeholder engagement in trial design: survey of visitors to critically ill patients regarding preferences for outcomes and treatment options during weaning from mechanical ventilation. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-445OC

  16. Jagosh, J., MacAulay, A.C., Pluye, P., Salsberg, J., Bush, P.L., Henderson, J., Sirett, E., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Herbert, C.P., Seifer, S.D., Green, L.W., Greenhalgh, T.: Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: implications of a realist review for health research and practice (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00665.x

  17. King, A.P.: Co-designing mobile collection points with older persons to promote green attitudes and practices in Hong Kong. Des. J. 22, 1675–1686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Machado, S.: Co-designing a UX toolkit for senior online communities: the case of the online community miOne (2021). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19586.81602

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the research project SEDUCE 2.0—Use of Communication and Information in the miOne online community by senior citizens. This project is funded by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., COMPETE 2020, Portugal 2020 and European Union, under the European Regional Development Fund, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031696 SEDUCE 2.0. Last but not least, a special thanks to all the participants that volunteered for this study and contributed with their time, expectations, and knowledge.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Vale Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Machado, S., Costa, L.V., Mealha, Ó., Veloso, A., Santos, C. (2022). Fostering Co-UXers in Later Age: Co-designing a UX Toolkit for the Senior Online Community MiOne. In: Mealha, Ó., Dascalu, M., Di Mascio, T. (eds) Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 249. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3930-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics