Skip to main content

Knowledge Graph Based Question-Answering System for Effective Case Law Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolution in Computational Intelligence

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 267))

Abstract

Case Law Analysis is a critical step in legal research, as every lawyer has to acquire the skill set to read, understand and apply case laws to augment their arguments and pleadings. We found that the interpretations of case laws provided by existing prominent legal tools are not complete in terms of providing some of the essential details required for effective case law analysis. This paper overcomes the above-mentioned challenge by proposing a judicial knowledge graph based question-answer system. Representing the judicial data in the form of knowledge graph ultimately benefits the legal professionals in analyzing case laws. The proposed approach supports querying the judicial knowledge graph in natural language text and then returns the results directly in natural language. We model the task of answering input queries as a cypher query pattern selection problem. Experimental results are quite satisfying in terms of efficiency and effectiveness in comparison to existing knowledge graph based question answering systems. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work is the first to offer legal question answering based on knowledge graph.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.lexisnexis.com.

  2. 2.

    https://casetext.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.fastcase.com/.

  4. 4.

    https://rossintelligence.com/

  5. 5.

    https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/westlaw.

  6. 6.

    https://www.manupatrafast.com/.

  7. 7.

    http://www.olisindia.in/.

  8. 8.

    http://hphighcourt.nic.in

References

  1. Abujabal, A., Yahya, M., Riedewald, M., Weikum, G.: Automated template generation for question answering over knowledge graphs. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1191–1200 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anu, T., Sangeetha, S.: A legal case ontology for extracting domain-specific entity relationships from e-judgments. In: Sixth International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Processing & Computing, pp. 305–312 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dong, X., Gabrilovich, E., Heitz, G., Horn, W., Lao, N., Murphy, K., Strohmann, T., Sun, S., Zhang, W.: Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 601–610 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Filtz, E.: Building and processing a knowledge-graph for legal data. In: European Semantic Web Conference, pp. 184–194. Springer (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geist, A.: Using citation analysis techniques for computer-assisted legal research in continental jurisdictions. SSRN 1397674 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoffart, J., Suchanek, F.M., Berberich, K., Weikum, G.: Yago2: a spatially and temporally enhanced knowledge base from Wikipedia. Artif. Intell. 194, 28–61 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lamy, J.B.: Owlready: ontology-oriented programming in python with automatic classification and high level constructs for biomedical ontologies. Artif. Intell. Med. 80, 11–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., Jentzsch, A., Kontokostas, D., Mendes, P.N., Hellmann, S., Morsey, M., Van Kleef, P., Auer, S., et al.: Dbpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semant. Web 6(2), 167–195 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parmesan, S., Scaiella, U., Barbera, M., Tarasova, T.: Dandelion: from raw data to datagems for developers. In: Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Developers, vol. 1268, ISWC-DEV’14, p. 1-6. CEUR-WS.org, Aachen, DEU (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, A., Sangeetha, S.: An innovative hybrid approach for extracting named entities from unstructured text data. Comput. Intell. 35(4), 799–826 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, C., Ré, C., Cafarella, M., De Sa, C., Ratner, A., Shin, J., Wang, F., Wu, S.: Deepdive: declarative knowledge base construction. Commun. ACM 60(5), 93–102 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, W., Zou, L., Lian, X., Yu, J.X., Song, S., Zhao, D.: How to build templates for RDF question/answering: an uncertain graph similarity join approach. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1809–1824 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zou, L., Huang, R., Wang, H., Yu, J.X., He, W., Zhao, D.: Natural language question answering over RDF: a graph data driven approach. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 313–324 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anu Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thomas, A., Sangeetha, S. (2022). Knowledge Graph Based Question-Answering System for Effective Case Law Analysis. In: Bhateja, V., Tang, J., Satapathy, S.C., Peer, P., Das, R. (eds) Evolution in Computational Intelligence. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 267. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6616-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics