Skip to main content

Regularizing Deep Text Models by Encouraging Competition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Graph and Semantic Computing: Knowledge Graph Empowers the Digital Economy (CCKS 2022)

Abstract

The difficulty in acquiring a large amount of labelled training data and the demand of complex neural network models in text learning make developing effective regularization techniques an important research topic. In this paper, we present a novel regularization scheme for supervised text learning, Competitive Word Dropout, or CWD. Experiments on three different natural language learning tasks demonstrate that CWD outperforms significantly the standard regularization schemes such as weight decay and dropout. The CWD scheme has another unique advantage, namely that it can be interpreted semantically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Biggio, B., et al.: Evasion attacks against machine learning at test time. In: Blockeel, H., Kersting, K., Nijssen, S., Železný, F. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8190, pp. 387–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40994-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Gal, Y., Ghahramani, Z.: Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059. PMLR (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1412.6572 (2014)

  4. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1188–1196. PMLR (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., Vladu, A.: Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1706.06083 (2017)

  6. Marelli, M., Menini, S., Baroni, M., Bentivogli, L., Bernardi, R., Zamparelli, R.: A sick cure for the evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 216–223 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miyato, T., Dai, A.M., Goodfellow, I.: Adversarial training methods for semi-supervised text classification. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1605.07725 (2016)

  8. Nguyen, A., Yosinski, J., Clune, J.: Deep neural networks are easily fooled: high confidence predictions for unrecognizable images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 427–436 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nicosia, M., Moschitti, A.: Semantic linking in convolutional neural networks for answer sentence selection. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1070–1076 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sha, L., Zhang, X., Qian, F., Chang, B., Sui, Z.: A multi-view fusion neural network for answer selection. In: 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shen, T., Zhou, T., Long, G., Jiang, J., Pan, S., Zhang, C.: Disan: directional self-attention network for rnn/cnn-free language understanding. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Socher, R., et al.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1631–1642 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Tai, K.S., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1503.00075 (2015)

  16. Tang, S., Jin, H., Fang, C., Wang, Z., de Sa, V.R.: Speeding up context-based sentence representation learning with non-autoregressive convolutional decoding. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1710.10380 (2017)

  17. Tang, S., de Sa, V.R.: Multi-view sentence representation learning. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1805.07443 (2018)

  18. Tran, N.K., Niedereée, C.: Multihop attention networks for question answer matching. In: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 325–334 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsipras, D., Santurkar, S., Engstrom, L., Turner, A., Madry, A.: Robustness may be at odds with accuracy. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1805.12152 (2018)

  20. Yang, Y., Yih, W.t., Meek, C.: Wikiqa: a challenge dataset for open-domain question answering. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2013–2018 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yoon, D., Lee, D., Lee, S.: Dynamic self-attention: computing attention over words dynamically for sentence embedding. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1808.07383 (2018)

  22. Yuan, X., He, P., Zhu, Q., Li, X.: Adversarial examples: attacks and defenses for deep learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 30(9), 2805–2824 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Key R &D Program of China under Grant 2021ZD0110700, in part by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, in part by the State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiaran Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, J., Zhang, R., Tian, Y. (2022). Regularizing Deep Text Models by Encouraging Competition. In: Sun, M., et al. Knowledge Graph and Semantic Computing: Knowledge Graph Empowers the Digital Economy. CCKS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1669. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7596-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7596-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7595-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7596-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics