Skip to main content

A Reviewer Recommender System for Scientific Articles Using a New Similarity Threshold Discovery Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering

Abstract

Among the tons of articles that are published every year, a considerable number of substandard articles are also published. One of the primary reasons for publishing these substandard articles is due to applying ineffective and/or inefficient reviewer selection processes. To overcome this problem, several reviewer recommender systems are proposed that do not depend on the intelligence of the human selector. However, most of these existing systems do not take the reviewer feedback score or confidence score into consideration during the recommendation process. Therefore, a new reviewer recommender system is proposed in this paper that recommends a set of reviewers to a set of manuscripts with an objective of attaining a high average confidence score taking several constraints into consideration, including a fixed number of reviewers for a manuscript and a fixed number of manuscripts to a reviewer. The proposed system employs a new similarity threshold discovery technique for facilitating the reviewer recommendation process. Again, since there is hardly any dataset exists that satisfies the requirements of the proposed system, a new dataset is prepared by getting the data from various online sources. The proposed system is evaluated by incorporating several existing selection techniques. The experimental results demonstrate that despite employing various selection techniques, the proposed system can assign most of the articles to the prescribed number of reviewers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amir R, Nabizadeh H, Salim N, Aghdam AR, Fard KB (2013) Recommendation systems: a review. Int J Comput Eng Res 3(5):47–52

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roy D, Dutta M (2022) A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems. J Big Data 9(1):1–36

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Kong X, Mao M, Wang W, Liu J, Xu B (2018) Voprec: vector representation learning of papers with text information and structural identity for recommendation. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput 99:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bai X, Wang M, Lee I, Yang Z, Kong X, Xia Feng (2019) Scientific paper recommendation: a survey. IEEE Access 7:9324–9339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41(6):391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jin J, Geng Q, Zhao Q, Zhang L (2017) Integrating the trend of research interest for reviewer assignment. In: International conference on world wide web companion, Perth, pp 1233–1241

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karimzadehgan M, Zhai CX (2009) Constrained multi-aspect expertise matching for committee review assignment. In: ACM conference on information and knowledge management, Hong Kong, pp 1697–1700

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu O, Wang J, Ma J, Sun Y (2016) An intelligent decision support approach for reviewer assignment in R &D project selection. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Karimzadehgan M, Zhai CX, Belford G (2008) Multi-aspect expertise matching for review assignment. In: ACM conference on information and knowledge management, Napa Valley, pp 1113–1122

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mimno D, Mccallum A (2007) Expertise modeling for matching papers with reviewers. In: ACM SIGKDD International conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, San Jose, California, USA, pp 500–509

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peng H, Hu H, Wang K, Wang C (2017) Time-aware and topic-based reviewer assignment. In: 22nd international conference on the database systems for advanced applications, Suzhou, China

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X, Suel T, Memon N (2014) A robust model for paper reviewer assignment. In: Eighth ACM conference on recommender systems, RecSys ’14, Foster City, Silicon Valley, CA, USA, pp 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang J, Zhang J, Yao L, Li J, Zhang L, Su Z (2008) Arnetminer: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, LasVegas, Nevada, USA, pp 990–998

    Google Scholar 

  14. Charlin L, Zemel RS, Boutilier C (2011) A framework for optimizing paper matching. In: UAI, vol 11, pp 86–95

    Google Scholar 

  15. Conry D, Koren Y, Ramakrishnan N (2009) Recommender systems for the conference paper assignment problem. In: ACM conference on recommender systems, New York, pp 357–360

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deep K, Das KN (2008) Quadratic approximation based hybrid genetic algorithm for function optimization. Appl Math Comput 203(1):86–98

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolasa T, Król D (2010) Aco-ga approach to paper-reviewer assignment problem in cms. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolasa T, Krol D (2011) A survey of algorithms for paper-reviewer assignment problem. IETE Tech Rev 28(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu Y, Ma J, Sun Y, Hao G, Xu W, Zhao D (2010) A decision support approach for assigning reviewers to proposals. Expert Syst Appl 37(10):6948–6956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan ZP, Chen Y, Ma J, Zhu Y (2009) Decision support for proposal grouping: A hybrid approach using knowledge rule and genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1004–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun YH, Ma J, Fan ZP, Wang J (2008) A hybrid knowledge and model approach for reviewer assignment. Expert Syst Appl 34(2):817–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabby G, Azad S, Mahmud M, Zamli KZ, Rahman MM (2020) Teket: a tree-based unsupervised keyphrase extraction technique. Cognit Comput 12(4):811–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chung NC, Miasojedow B, Startek M, Gambin A (2019) Jaccard/tanimoto similarity test and estimation methods for biological presence-absence data. BMC Bioinf 20(Suppl 15):644. arXiv:1903.11372. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-019-3118-5. PMC 6929325. PMID 31874610

  24. Salton G, Buckley C (1988) Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf Process Manage 24(5):513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hans Peter Luhn (1957) A statistical approach to mechanized encoding and searching of literary information. IBM J Res Dev 1(4):309–317

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones KS (1972) A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. J Doc 28:1121, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.115.8343, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026526

  27. Reviewer recommendation dataset. Date last accessed 17 Sept 2022

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Rossum G, Drake FL (2009) Python 3 reference manual. Scotts Valley, CA CreateSpace

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saiful Azad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Azad, S. et al. (2023). A Reviewer Recommender System for Scientific Articles Using a New Similarity Threshold Discovery Technique. In: Kaiser, M.S., Waheed, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., Mahmud, M., Ray, K. (eds) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Trends in Computational and Cognitive Engineering. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 618. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9483-8_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics