Abstract
Many studies have been carried out worldwide to predict carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions using various methods. Most of the methods are not sufficiently able to provide good forecasting performances due to the problems with non-linearity of the data. Fuzzy inference system (FIS) and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) are two of the well-known methods with its ability to handle the problems of non-linearity. However, the performances of these two fuzzy based models in predicting CO2 emissions are not immediately known. This paper offers the performance comparison of the two fuzzy based models in prediction of CO2 emissions in Malaysia. The inputs for the models were simulated using the Malaysian data for the period of 1980–2009. The prediction performances were measured using root means square error, mean absolute error and mean absolute percentage error. The performances of the two models against the CO2 emission clearly show that the ANFIS outperforms the FIS model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change (IPCC). Synthesis Report, Geneva, Switzerland (2007).
Pokrovsky, O.M., Kwok, Roger H.F., Ng, C.N. : Fuzzy logic approach for description of meteorological impacts on urban air pollution species.. A Hong Kong case study. Computers & Geosciences, 28, 119–127 (2002).
Marino, D., Morabito, F. C., Ricca, B.:Management of uncertainty in environmental problems: an assessment of technical aspects and policies. Handbook of Uncertainty, J. Gil Aluja, Ed., Kluwer Academic Publisher (2001).
Pao, H.T., Fu, H.C., Tseng, C.L.: Forecasting of CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China using an improved grey model.Energy.40(1),400–409 (2012).
Pao, H.T., Tsai, C.M. : Modeling and forecasting the CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energy. 36(5), 2450–2458 (2011).
Lin, C.S., Liou, F.M.,Huang, C.P.: Grey forecasting model for CO2 emissions: A Taiwan study. Applied Energy. 88, 3816–3820 (2011).
Lu, I.J., Lewis, C., Lin, S.J.: The forecast of motor vehicle, energy demand and CO2 emission from Taiwan’s road transportation sector, Energy Policy 37(8), 2952–2961 (2009).
Radojević, D., Pocajt, V., Popović, I., Perić-Grujić, A., Ristić, M. Forecasting of Greenhouse Gas Emission in Serbia Using Artificial Neural Networks, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 35(8), 733–740 (2013).
Liu, P., Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Cheng, S. : Carbon Emissions Modeling of China Using Neural Network. Computational Sciences and Optimization (CSO), Fifth International Joint Conference, pp.679–682 (2012).
Yap, W.K, Karri, V. Emissions predictive modelling by investigating various neural network models.Expert Syst. Appl. 39(3), 2421–2426 (2012).
Li, S., Zhou, R., Ma, X. : The forecast of CO2 emissions in China based on RBF neural networks. Industrial and Information Systems (IIS), 2nd International Conference, pp.319–322 (2010).
Sözen, A., Gülseven, Z., Arcaklioğlu, E. : Forecasting based on sectoral energy consumption of GHGs in Turkey and mitigation policies. Energy Policy. 35(12), 6491–6505 (2007).
Feng, Y.Y., Chen, S.Q., Zhang, L.X. :System dynamics modeling for urban energy consumption and CO2 emissions: A case study of Beijing, China, Ecol. Model. 252,44–52 (2013).
Zhao, J., Zhang, J., Jia, S., Li, Q., Zhu, Y. A: MapReduce framework for on-road mobile fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission estimation.Geoinformatics, 19th International Conference, pp.1–4 (2011).
Mintz, R., Young, B. R.,Svrcek, W. Y.: Fuzzy logic modeling of surface ozone concentrations.Computers and Chemical Engineering.29, 2049–2059 (2005).
Peche, R., Rodríguez, E.: Environmental impact assessment procedure: A new approach based on fuzzy logic. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.29, 275–283 (2009).
Huang, Y., Chen, X., Li, Y. P., Huang, G.H., Liu, T. : A fuzzy-based simulation method for modelling hydrological processes under uncertainty.Hydrol.Process.24, 3718–3732 (2010).
Carbajal-Hernández, J. J., Sánchez-Fernández, L.P., Carrasco-Ochoa, J. A., & Martínez-Trinidad, J. F.: Assessment and prediction of air quality using fuzzy logic and autoregressive Models. Atmospheric Environment, 60, 37–50. (2012).
Yetilmezsoy, K., & Abdul-Wahab, S.A. : A prognostic approach based on fuzzy-logic methodology to forecast PM10 levels in Khaldiya residential area, Kuwait. Aerosol and Air Quality Research,12,1217–1236 (2012).
Antanasijević, D.Z., Pocajt, V.V., Povrenović, D.S., Ristić, M.Đ., Perić-Grujić, A.A., : PM10 emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization. Sci. Total Environ 443,511–519 (2012).
Yu, Z., Liangsheng, L.,& Changhai, S.: Evaluation of the Levels of Manufacturers Developing Low-Carbon on BP Neural Network.E-Product E-Service and E-Entertainment (ICEEE), 2010 International Conference,pp.1-4 (2010).
Lim, Y., Moon, Y.S.,& Kim, T.W. :Artificial neural network approach for prediction of ammonia emission from field-applied manure and relative significance assessment of ammonia emission factors.Europ. J. Agronomy. 26, 425–434 (2007).
Jain, S., & Khare.M.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy modeling for prediction of ambient CO concentration at urban intersections and roadways. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 3, 203–212 (2010).
Morabito, F.C., & Versaci, M.: Fuzzy Neural Identification and forecasting techniques to process experimental urban air pollution data., Neural Network.16, 493–506 (2003).
Noori, R., Hoshyaripour, G., Ashrafi, K., & Araabi, B.N.: Uncertainty analysis of developed ANN and ANFIS models in prediction of carbon monoxide daily concentration. Atmospheric Environment 44(4), 476–482 (2010).
Campbell, P. R J. : Comparison of fuzzy modelling techniques for load forecasting,. Fuzzy Systems Conference, 2007.FUZZ-IEEE 2007. IEEE International, pp.1,5. (2007).
Badri, A., Ameli, Z., & Birjandi, A. M.: Application of artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic methods for short term load forecasting, Energy Procedia, 1883–1888 (2012).
Lohani, A.K., Kumar, R., & Singh, R.D. :Hydrological time series modeling: A comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy, neural network and autoregressive techniques. Journal of Hydrology, 442–443, 23–35 (2012).
Chen, M.S., Ying, L.C., & Pan, M.C.: Forecasting tourist arrivals by using the adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system.Expert Systems with Applica-tions. 37, 1185–1191 (2010).
World Bank 2011. World Development Indicators [Online].http://data.worldbank.org/, (2011).
Palani, S.,Liong, S.Y., & Tkalich, P.: An ANN application for water quality forecasting. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 56, 1586–1597 (2008).
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education and University Malaysia Terengganu for financial support under the FRGS grant number 59243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pauzi, H.M., Abdullah, L. (2014). Performance Comparison of Two Fuzzy Based Models in Predicting Carbon Dioxide Emissions. In: Herawan, T., Deris, M., Abawajy, J. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advanced Data and Information Engineering (DaEng-2013). Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 285. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-18-7_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-18-7_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-4585-17-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-18-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)