Skip to main content

Multivariate Comparative Analysis of Statistical and Deep Learning Models for Prediction Hardware Failure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science and Emerging Technologies (DaSET 2023)

Abstract

The twenty-first century is witnessing a transformative shift toward digitalization, where various services are undergoing a paradigm change from traditional to digital platforms. This digital revolution, evident in the transition from commerce to e-commerce and agriculture to agrotech, necessitates the development of robust and sustainable systems to support these applications. While cloud providers like Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud offer Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) solutions, many organizations still prefer on-site hardware maintenance. The existing studies on system failure prediction have primarily focused on either machine learning techniques like random forest and Naive Bayes or deep learning neural networks like RNN, LSTM, and CNN. However, there has been no comprehensive comparison of prediction accuracy between statistical models and deep learning models. This research aims to identify the algorithm that yields the highest prediction accuracy while considering hardware resource utilization, including CPU, RAM, ROM, and network usage. The study utilizes multivariate time series analysis to predict system failures based on the “BitsBrain” dataset. The models evaluated include ARIMA, auto-regression, SARIMAX, exponential smoothing, LSTM, and Bi-LSTM. The results demonstrate that the Bi-LSTM model outperforms the other models, achieving the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and the highest R2 score. Conversely, the exponential smoothing model exhibits the poorest performance. Additionally, a comparison of actual versus predicted plots reveals that the Bi-LSTM model generates more accurate predictions. These findings suggest that the Bi-LSTM model can serve as a valuable tool for forecasting system failures and enhancing system reliability. Its superior prediction accuracy, coupled with relatively efficient resource utilization, makes it a compelling choice for organizations seeking to optimize their system performance and minimize downtime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yu G, Chen P, Chen H, Guan Z, Huang Z, Jing L, Weng T, Sun X, Li X (2021) Microrank: end-to-end latency issue localization with extended spectrum analysis in microservice environments. In: Proceedings of the web conference 2021, pp 3087–3098

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anon (2021) Mark Zuckerberg apologises for Facebook, WhatsApp disruption—The Economic Times [Online]. economictimes.indiatimes.com. Available from: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/mark-zuckerberg-apologises-for-facebook-whatsapp-disruption/articleshow/86772424.cms. Accessed 3 Nov 2022

  3. Abro JH, Li C, Shafiq M, Vishnukumar A, Mewada S, Malpani K, Osei-Owusu J (2022) Artificial intelligence enabled effective fault prediction techniques in cloud computing environment for improving resource optimization. Sci Program 2022:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Litoiu M, Watts I, Wigglesworth J (2021) The 13th CASCON workshop on cloud computing: engineering AIOps. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual international conference on computer science and software engineering, pp 280–281

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tehrani C, Beer R, Popp H et al (2017) Education 4.0—fostering student's performance with machine learning methods. In: 2017 IEEE 23rd international symposium for design and technology in electronic packaging (SIITME), pp 438–443. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chalermarrewong T, Achalakul T, See SCW (2012) Failure prediction of data centers using time series and fault tree analysis. In: 2012 IEEE 18th international conference on parallel and distributed systems, pp 794–799. IEE

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rawat A, Sushil R, Agarwal A, Sikander A (2021) A new approach for vm failure prediction using stochastic model in cloud. IETE J Res 67(2):165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi J, Du J, Ren Y, Li B, Zou J, Zhang A (2022) Convolution-LSTM-based mechanical hard disk failure prediction by sensoring SMART indicators. J Sens 2022:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bitbrains (n.d.) GWA-T-12 Bitbrains [Online]. Bitbrains. Available from: http://gwa.ewi.tudelft.nl/datasets/gwa-t-12-bitbrains. Accessed 3 Nov 2022

  10. Jain R, Chetty P (2020) Introduction to the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. [Online]. projectguru.in. Available from: https://www.projectguru.in/introduction-to-the-autoregressive-integrated-moving-average-arima-model/. Accessed: 27 Dec 2022

  11. Triebe O, Laptev N, Rajagopal R (2019) Ar-net: a simple auto-regressive neural network for time-series. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12436

  12. Zhang N, Zhang Y, Lu H (2011) Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average and support vector machine models: prediction of short-term traffic flow on freeways. Transp Res Rec 2215(1):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ostertagová E, Ostertag O (2011, September) The simple exponential smoothing model. In: The 4th international conference on modelling of mechanical and mechatronic systems, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic, proceedings of conference, pp 380–384

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu Y, Si X, Hu C, Zhang J (2019) A review of recurrent neural networks: LSTM cells and network architectures. Neural Comput 31(7):1235–1270

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun Q, Jankovic MV, Bally L, Mougiakakou SG (2018, November) Predicting blood glucose with an lstm and bi-lstm based deep neural network. In: 2018 14th symposium on neural networks and applications (NEUREL), pp 1–5. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saurabh Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gupta, S., Alshabandar, R., Loy, C.K., Mohammed, A.H. (2024). Multivariate Comparative Analysis of Statistical and Deep Learning Models for Prediction Hardware Failure. In: Bee Wah, Y., Al-Jumeily OBE, D., Berry, M.W. (eds) Data Science and Emerging Technologies. DaSET 2023. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 191. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0293-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics